Peculiarities of The Perception of The Phenomenon of The Armenian Genocide on Public Opinion

The research study was conducted in two stages, in 2015 and 2016 from March 15 to April 15 utilizing the method of formalized interview.  Each phase of the survey involved 560 Yerevan residents. As the results of the research come to prove, the mosaic of the public perception and the psychological...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hovhannes Hovhannisyan, Hasmik Hovhannisyan, Astghik Petrosyan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Armenian State Pedagogical University 2016-07-01
Series:Imastut'yun
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.wisdomperiodical.com/index.php/wisdom/article/view/66
Description
Summary:The research study was conducted in two stages, in 2015 and 2016 from March 15 to April 15 utilizing the method of formalized interview.  Each phase of the survey involved 560 Yerevan residents. As the results of the research come to prove, the mosaic of the public perception and the psychological reflection of the phenomenon of the Armenian Genocide is very sophisticated. The moods of regret, pain, depression, declining moods, complaint, wrath, revenge, hope and optimistic views for future are intertwined and bound together. These moods and feelings appear next to each other and quickly alternating. According to the results of both 2015 and 2016 surveys the moods of overcoming pain, faith and hope, optimistic attitude towards the future (91.4%) are dominant over complaint, anger, revenge, struggle for compensation (85.5%) and regret, pain, depression, declining moods (69.6 %). The indicators of the moods and feelings of the first and second groups are generally stable. In this connection both studies in 2015 and 2016 recorded similar results. However, the indicators of the following moods decreased from 76.2% to 69.6%: regret, pain, depression, declining moods, the manifestations of the complex of a victim. The indicator of more intense expression of such moods dropped from 47.2% to 35.6%. The authors explain such change by the influence of three internal and external political factor groups.
ISSN:1829-3824