Do Academic Health Care Systems Really Value Education? A Survey of Academic Plastic Surgeons

Background:. Although education is critical to the mission of academic medical centers in the United States, it is often not quantified and monetized as are their research and clinical missions. We undertook this survey to assess the perceived valuation of educational endeavors of plastic surgeon fa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Helen H. Sun, BS, Navid Pourtaheri, MD, PhD, Jeffrey E. Janis, MD, Devra B. Becker, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer 2018-10-01
Series:Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
Online Access:http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001948
id doaj-dfcc7b3f0f4742e584c494e88c9e0b38
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dfcc7b3f0f4742e584c494e88c9e0b382020-11-25T00:26:18ZengWolters KluwerPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open2169-75742018-10-01610e194810.1097/GOX.0000000000001948201810000-00018Do Academic Health Care Systems Really Value Education? A Survey of Academic Plastic SurgeonsHelen H. Sun, BS0Navid Pourtaheri, MD, PhD1Jeffrey E. Janis, MD2Devra B. Becker, MD3From the *Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland, Ohio†Department of Plastic Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio‡Department of Plastic Surgery, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OhioFrom the *Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Department of Plastic Surgery, Cleveland, OhioBackground:. Although education is critical to the mission of academic medical centers in the United States, it is often not quantified and monetized as are their research and clinical missions. We undertook this survey to assess the perceived valuation of educational endeavors of plastic surgeon faculty at the U.S. academic medical centers. Methods:. A survey using Qualtrics software (Qualtrics, Provo, UT) was distributed to faculty members of the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons by electronic mail in February 2015. A total of 16 questions included both demographic information and Likert-item questions of perception of valuation of educational activities. For analysis, responses were grouped according to an adapted Net Promoter Score including “unsupportive” (0–6), “neutral” (7–8), and “supportive” (9–10). Results:. Sixty-five surveys were completed out of a total of 406, with an overall response rate of 16%. Kruskal-Wallis statistical analysis demonstrated that region and rank were not significant in perception of hospital or departmental support for educational activities. Respondents rated their departments as more supportive than their institutions (P < 0.05), and average perceived value rating of institutions was “unsupportive.” Financial support was associated with higher ratings with respect to support of institutions and departments. Mid-career faculty displayed a trend toward lower ratings of perception of support. Conclusions:. The majority of respondents perceived their institutions and departments as unsupportive of educational effort. Direct compensation to physicians for teaching efforts may improve faculty retention in academia and reduce physician burnout.http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001948
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Helen H. Sun, BS
Navid Pourtaheri, MD, PhD
Jeffrey E. Janis, MD
Devra B. Becker, MD
spellingShingle Helen H. Sun, BS
Navid Pourtaheri, MD, PhD
Jeffrey E. Janis, MD
Devra B. Becker, MD
Do Academic Health Care Systems Really Value Education? A Survey of Academic Plastic Surgeons
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
author_facet Helen H. Sun, BS
Navid Pourtaheri, MD, PhD
Jeffrey E. Janis, MD
Devra B. Becker, MD
author_sort Helen H. Sun, BS
title Do Academic Health Care Systems Really Value Education? A Survey of Academic Plastic Surgeons
title_short Do Academic Health Care Systems Really Value Education? A Survey of Academic Plastic Surgeons
title_full Do Academic Health Care Systems Really Value Education? A Survey of Academic Plastic Surgeons
title_fullStr Do Academic Health Care Systems Really Value Education? A Survey of Academic Plastic Surgeons
title_full_unstemmed Do Academic Health Care Systems Really Value Education? A Survey of Academic Plastic Surgeons
title_sort do academic health care systems really value education? a survey of academic plastic surgeons
publisher Wolters Kluwer
series Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Global Open
issn 2169-7574
publishDate 2018-10-01
description Background:. Although education is critical to the mission of academic medical centers in the United States, it is often not quantified and monetized as are their research and clinical missions. We undertook this survey to assess the perceived valuation of educational endeavors of plastic surgeon faculty at the U.S. academic medical centers. Methods:. A survey using Qualtrics software (Qualtrics, Provo, UT) was distributed to faculty members of the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons by electronic mail in February 2015. A total of 16 questions included both demographic information and Likert-item questions of perception of valuation of educational activities. For analysis, responses were grouped according to an adapted Net Promoter Score including “unsupportive” (0–6), “neutral” (7–8), and “supportive” (9–10). Results:. Sixty-five surveys were completed out of a total of 406, with an overall response rate of 16%. Kruskal-Wallis statistical analysis demonstrated that region and rank were not significant in perception of hospital or departmental support for educational activities. Respondents rated their departments as more supportive than their institutions (P < 0.05), and average perceived value rating of institutions was “unsupportive.” Financial support was associated with higher ratings with respect to support of institutions and departments. Mid-career faculty displayed a trend toward lower ratings of perception of support. Conclusions:. The majority of respondents perceived their institutions and departments as unsupportive of educational effort. Direct compensation to physicians for teaching efforts may improve faculty retention in academia and reduce physician burnout.
url http://journals.lww.com/prsgo/fulltext/10.1097/GOX.0000000000001948
work_keys_str_mv AT helenhsunbs doacademichealthcaresystemsreallyvalueeducationasurveyofacademicplasticsurgeons
AT navidpourtaherimdphd doacademichealthcaresystemsreallyvalueeducationasurveyofacademicplasticsurgeons
AT jeffreyejanismd doacademichealthcaresystemsreallyvalueeducationasurveyofacademicplasticsurgeons
AT devrabbeckermd doacademichealthcaresystemsreallyvalueeducationasurveyofacademicplasticsurgeons
_version_ 1725344819963756544