Tilted Implants for Full-Arch Rehabilitations in Completely Edentulous Maxilla: A Retrospective Study

Purpose. The aims of this study were to assess the treatment outcome of immediately loaded full-arch fixed bridges anchored to both tilted and axially placed implants in the edentulous maxilla and to evaluate the incidence of biological and prosthetic complications. Materials and Methods. Thirty-fou...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicolò Cavalli, Bruno Barbaro, Davide Spasari, Francesco Azzola, Alberto Ciatti, Luca Francetti
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:International Journal of Dentistry
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/180379
id doaj-dfe355ba61ab4100a939a99a5a5a6a8f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dfe355ba61ab4100a939a99a5a5a6a8f2020-11-24T23:54:04ZengHindawi LimitedInternational Journal of Dentistry1687-87281687-87362012-01-01201210.1155/2012/180379180379Tilted Implants for Full-Arch Rehabilitations in Completely Edentulous Maxilla: A Retrospective StudyNicolò Cavalli0Bruno Barbaro1Davide Spasari2Francesco Azzola3Alberto Ciatti4Luca Francetti5Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Oral Implantology Research Center, Università degli Studi di Milano, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Oral Implantology Research Center, Università degli Studi di Milano, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Oral Implantology Research Center, Università degli Studi di Milano, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Oral Implantology Research Center, Università degli Studi di Milano, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Oral Implantology Research Center, Università degli Studi di Milano, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, ItalyDepartment of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences, Oral Implantology Research Center, Università degli Studi di Milano, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, 20161 Milan, ItalyPurpose. The aims of this study were to assess the treatment outcome of immediately loaded full-arch fixed bridges anchored to both tilted and axially placed implants in the edentulous maxilla and to evaluate the incidence of biological and prosthetic complications. Materials and Methods. Thirty-four patients (18 women and 16 men) were included in the study. Each patient received a maxillary full-arch fixed bridge supported by two axial implants and two distal tilted implants. A total of 136 implants were inserted. Loading was applied within 48 hours of surgery and definitive restorations were placed 4 to 6 months later. Patients were scheduled for followup at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months and annually up to 5 years. At each followup plaque level and bleeding scores were assessed and every complication was recorded. Results. The overall follow-up range was 12 to 73 months (mean 38.8 months). No implant failures were recorded to date, leading to a cumulative implant survival rate of 100%. Biological complications were recorded such as alveolar mucositis (11.8% patients), peri-implantitis (5.9% patients), and temporomandibular joint pain (5.9% patients). The most common prosthetic complications were the fracture or detachment of one or multiple acrylic teeth in both the temporary (20.6% patients) and definitive (17.7% patients) prosthesis and the minor acrylic fractures in the temporary (14.7% patients) and definitive (2.9% patients) prosthesis. Hygienic complications occurred in 38.2% patients. No patients’ dissatisfactions were recorded. Conclusions. The high cumulative implant survival rate indicates that this technique could be considered a viable treatment option. An effective recall program is important to early intercept and correct prosthetic and biologic complications in order to avoid implant and prosthetic failures.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/180379
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nicolò Cavalli
Bruno Barbaro
Davide Spasari
Francesco Azzola
Alberto Ciatti
Luca Francetti
spellingShingle Nicolò Cavalli
Bruno Barbaro
Davide Spasari
Francesco Azzola
Alberto Ciatti
Luca Francetti
Tilted Implants for Full-Arch Rehabilitations in Completely Edentulous Maxilla: A Retrospective Study
International Journal of Dentistry
author_facet Nicolò Cavalli
Bruno Barbaro
Davide Spasari
Francesco Azzola
Alberto Ciatti
Luca Francetti
author_sort Nicolò Cavalli
title Tilted Implants for Full-Arch Rehabilitations in Completely Edentulous Maxilla: A Retrospective Study
title_short Tilted Implants for Full-Arch Rehabilitations in Completely Edentulous Maxilla: A Retrospective Study
title_full Tilted Implants for Full-Arch Rehabilitations in Completely Edentulous Maxilla: A Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Tilted Implants for Full-Arch Rehabilitations in Completely Edentulous Maxilla: A Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Tilted Implants for Full-Arch Rehabilitations in Completely Edentulous Maxilla: A Retrospective Study
title_sort tilted implants for full-arch rehabilitations in completely edentulous maxilla: a retrospective study
publisher Hindawi Limited
series International Journal of Dentistry
issn 1687-8728
1687-8736
publishDate 2012-01-01
description Purpose. The aims of this study were to assess the treatment outcome of immediately loaded full-arch fixed bridges anchored to both tilted and axially placed implants in the edentulous maxilla and to evaluate the incidence of biological and prosthetic complications. Materials and Methods. Thirty-four patients (18 women and 16 men) were included in the study. Each patient received a maxillary full-arch fixed bridge supported by two axial implants and two distal tilted implants. A total of 136 implants were inserted. Loading was applied within 48 hours of surgery and definitive restorations were placed 4 to 6 months later. Patients were scheduled for followup at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months and annually up to 5 years. At each followup plaque level and bleeding scores were assessed and every complication was recorded. Results. The overall follow-up range was 12 to 73 months (mean 38.8 months). No implant failures were recorded to date, leading to a cumulative implant survival rate of 100%. Biological complications were recorded such as alveolar mucositis (11.8% patients), peri-implantitis (5.9% patients), and temporomandibular joint pain (5.9% patients). The most common prosthetic complications were the fracture or detachment of one or multiple acrylic teeth in both the temporary (20.6% patients) and definitive (17.7% patients) prosthesis and the minor acrylic fractures in the temporary (14.7% patients) and definitive (2.9% patients) prosthesis. Hygienic complications occurred in 38.2% patients. No patients’ dissatisfactions were recorded. Conclusions. The high cumulative implant survival rate indicates that this technique could be considered a viable treatment option. An effective recall program is important to early intercept and correct prosthetic and biologic complications in order to avoid implant and prosthetic failures.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/180379
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolocavalli tiltedimplantsforfullarchrehabilitationsincompletelyedentulousmaxillaaretrospectivestudy
AT brunobarbaro tiltedimplantsforfullarchrehabilitationsincompletelyedentulousmaxillaaretrospectivestudy
AT davidespasari tiltedimplantsforfullarchrehabilitationsincompletelyedentulousmaxillaaretrospectivestudy
AT francescoazzola tiltedimplantsforfullarchrehabilitationsincompletelyedentulousmaxillaaretrospectivestudy
AT albertociatti tiltedimplantsforfullarchrehabilitationsincompletelyedentulousmaxillaaretrospectivestudy
AT lucafrancetti tiltedimplantsforfullarchrehabilitationsincompletelyedentulousmaxillaaretrospectivestudy
_version_ 1725467481751945216