Réflexions à propos du patrimoine urbain en Asie du Sud-Est, sur le versant de l’« UNESCO-isation »

Far from occupying a prevailing position in the field of preservation of the ancient centres of active cities in South-East Asia, UNESCO is nevertheless gaining in influence through programmes open to the socio-economic and environmental aspects of urban heritage prot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Charles Goldblum
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Université de Provence 2020-11-01
Series:Moussons
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/moussons/6417
id doaj-dffe90f6e630482e97f7501370f8280c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-dffe90f6e630482e97f7501370f8280c2020-12-08T17:18:41ZengUniversité de ProvenceMoussons1620-32242262-83632020-11-0136355110.4000/moussons.6417Réflexions à propos du patrimoine urbain en Asie du Sud-Est, sur le versant de l’« UNESCO-isation »Charles GoldblumFar from occupying a prevailing position in the field of preservation of the ancient centres of active cities in South-East Asia, UNESCO is nevertheless gaining in influence through programmes open to the socio-economic and environmental aspects of urban heritage protection. Observing this trend and its implications for the internationalisation of the heritage field in South-East Asia, the present article addresses two themes: the entry of heritage interventions into the world of urban projects, and the internationalisation of the heritage vocabulary used to qualify spaces, with the translation issues raised by expressions such as « cultural landscape » and « creative city » ensuring their assignment to related intervention programmes. These reflections are based in particular on a critical reading of the contributions to the book UNESCO in Southeast Asia. World Heritage Sites in Comparative Perspective edited by Victor T. King (2016a)—an author from whom we borrow the term “UNESCO-isation”.http://journals.openedition.org/moussons/6417AngkorAskew MarcBangkokChiang MaiChinatowncity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Charles Goldblum
spellingShingle Charles Goldblum
Réflexions à propos du patrimoine urbain en Asie du Sud-Est, sur le versant de l’« UNESCO-isation »
Moussons
Angkor
Askew Marc
Bangkok
Chiang Mai
Chinatown
city
author_facet Charles Goldblum
author_sort Charles Goldblum
title Réflexions à propos du patrimoine urbain en Asie du Sud-Est, sur le versant de l’« UNESCO-isation »
title_short Réflexions à propos du patrimoine urbain en Asie du Sud-Est, sur le versant de l’« UNESCO-isation »
title_full Réflexions à propos du patrimoine urbain en Asie du Sud-Est, sur le versant de l’« UNESCO-isation »
title_fullStr Réflexions à propos du patrimoine urbain en Asie du Sud-Est, sur le versant de l’« UNESCO-isation »
title_full_unstemmed Réflexions à propos du patrimoine urbain en Asie du Sud-Est, sur le versant de l’« UNESCO-isation »
title_sort réflexions à propos du patrimoine urbain en asie du sud-est, sur le versant de l’« unesco-isation »
publisher Université de Provence
series Moussons
issn 1620-3224
2262-8363
publishDate 2020-11-01
description Far from occupying a prevailing position in the field of preservation of the ancient centres of active cities in South-East Asia, UNESCO is nevertheless gaining in influence through programmes open to the socio-economic and environmental aspects of urban heritage protection. Observing this trend and its implications for the internationalisation of the heritage field in South-East Asia, the present article addresses two themes: the entry of heritage interventions into the world of urban projects, and the internationalisation of the heritage vocabulary used to qualify spaces, with the translation issues raised by expressions such as « cultural landscape » and « creative city » ensuring their assignment to related intervention programmes. These reflections are based in particular on a critical reading of the contributions to the book UNESCO in Southeast Asia. World Heritage Sites in Comparative Perspective edited by Victor T. King (2016a)—an author from whom we borrow the term “UNESCO-isation”.
topic Angkor
Askew Marc
Bangkok
Chiang Mai
Chinatown
city
url http://journals.openedition.org/moussons/6417
work_keys_str_mv AT charlesgoldblum reflexionsaproposdupatrimoineurbainenasiedusudestsurleversantdelunescoisation
_version_ 1724389024050708480