Gene expression programming and ensemble methods for bushfire susceptibility mapping: a case study of Victoria, Australia

• Main Authors: Maryamsadat Hosseini, Samsung Lim
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2021-01-01
• Series: Geomatics, Natural Hazards & Risk
• Subjects: bushfire; gep; susceptibility map; natural hazard; gis
• Online Access: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2021.1964618

Bushfire susceptibility mapping helps the government authorities predict and provide the required disaster management plans to reduce the adverse impacts from bushfires. In this paper, we investigated Gene Expression Programming (GEP) and ensemble methods to create bushfire susceptibility maps for Victoria, Australia, as a case study. Bushfire susceptibility maps indicate that the eastern part of Victoria where forests are predominant has the highest probability of bushfire. Western part of Victoria which is covered by cropland, shrubland and grassland has the lowest bushfire probability. Two ensemble methods, namely an ensemble of GEP and Frequency Ratio (GEPFR) and an ensemble of Logistic Regression and Frequency Ratio (LRFR), were proposed and compared with stand-alone GEP and stand-alone Frequency Ratio (FR) methods. The proposed methods were evaluated by Area Under Curve (AUC). AUCs of GEPFR, LRFR, GEP and FR are 0.860, 0.852, 0.850, and 0.840, respectively. It can be concluded that GEPFR outperforms the other three methods, and the ensemble methods outperform the stand-alone methods. GEPFR, LRFR and GEP produced the bushfire probability with an accuracy in the range of 90.79%−92.27%, and therefore they are equally useful for policy makers and managers to have better natural hazard management plans.