The influence of maintenance quality of hemodialysis machines on hemodialysis efficiency

Several studies suggest that there is a correlation between dose of dialysis and machine maintenance. However, in spite of the current practice, there are conflicting reports regarding the relationship between dose of dialysis or patient outcome, and machine maintenance. In order to evaluate the imp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Azar Ahmad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2009-01-01
Series:Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sjkdt.org/article.asp?issn=1319-2442;year=2009;volume=20;issue=1;spage=49;epage=56;aulast=Azar
id doaj-e0397cff63794fd6a3dcc8f64dfeff00
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e0397cff63794fd6a3dcc8f64dfeff002020-11-25T00:20:22ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsSaudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation1319-24422009-01-012014956The influence of maintenance quality of hemodialysis machines on hemodialysis efficiencyAzar AhmadSeveral studies suggest that there is a correlation between dose of dialysis and machine maintenance. However, in spite of the current practice, there are conflicting reports regarding the relationship between dose of dialysis or patient outcome, and machine maintenance. In order to evaluate the impact of hemodialysis machine maintenance on dialysis adequacy Kt/V and session performance, data were processed on 134 patients on 3-times-per-week dialysis regimens by dividing the patients into four groups and also dividing the hemodialysis machines into four groups according to their year of installation. The equilibrated dialysis dose <sub> eq</sub> Kt/V, urea reduction ratio (URR) and the overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) were calculated in each group to show the effect hemodialysis machine efficiency on the overall session performance. The average working time per machine per month was 270 hours. The cumulative number of hours according to the year of installation was: 26,122 hours for machines installed in 1998; 21,596 hours for machines installed in 1999, 8362 hours for those installed in 2003 and 2486 hours for those installed in 2005. The mean time between failures (MTBF) was 1.8, 2.1, 4.2 and 6 months between failures for machines installed in 1999, 1998, 2003 and 2005, respectively. Statistical analysis demonstrated that the dialysis dose <sub> eq</sub> Kt/V and URR were increased as the overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) increases with regular maintenance procedures. Maintenance has become one of the most expedient approaches to guarantee high machine dependability. The efficiency of dialysis machine is relevant in assuring a proper dialysis adequacy.http://www.sjkdt.org/article.asp?issn=1319-2442;year=2009;volume=20;issue=1;spage=49;epage=56;aulast=AzarHemodialysisDialysis adequacyPreventive maintenanceOverall equipment effectiveness
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Azar Ahmad
spellingShingle Azar Ahmad
The influence of maintenance quality of hemodialysis machines on hemodialysis efficiency
Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation
Hemodialysis
Dialysis adequacy
Preventive maintenance
Overall equipment effectiveness
author_facet Azar Ahmad
author_sort Azar Ahmad
title The influence of maintenance quality of hemodialysis machines on hemodialysis efficiency
title_short The influence of maintenance quality of hemodialysis machines on hemodialysis efficiency
title_full The influence of maintenance quality of hemodialysis machines on hemodialysis efficiency
title_fullStr The influence of maintenance quality of hemodialysis machines on hemodialysis efficiency
title_full_unstemmed The influence of maintenance quality of hemodialysis machines on hemodialysis efficiency
title_sort influence of maintenance quality of hemodialysis machines on hemodialysis efficiency
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation
issn 1319-2442
publishDate 2009-01-01
description Several studies suggest that there is a correlation between dose of dialysis and machine maintenance. However, in spite of the current practice, there are conflicting reports regarding the relationship between dose of dialysis or patient outcome, and machine maintenance. In order to evaluate the impact of hemodialysis machine maintenance on dialysis adequacy Kt/V and session performance, data were processed on 134 patients on 3-times-per-week dialysis regimens by dividing the patients into four groups and also dividing the hemodialysis machines into four groups according to their year of installation. The equilibrated dialysis dose <sub> eq</sub> Kt/V, urea reduction ratio (URR) and the overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) were calculated in each group to show the effect hemodialysis machine efficiency on the overall session performance. The average working time per machine per month was 270 hours. The cumulative number of hours according to the year of installation was: 26,122 hours for machines installed in 1998; 21,596 hours for machines installed in 1999, 8362 hours for those installed in 2003 and 2486 hours for those installed in 2005. The mean time between failures (MTBF) was 1.8, 2.1, 4.2 and 6 months between failures for machines installed in 1999, 1998, 2003 and 2005, respectively. Statistical analysis demonstrated that the dialysis dose <sub> eq</sub> Kt/V and URR were increased as the overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) increases with regular maintenance procedures. Maintenance has become one of the most expedient approaches to guarantee high machine dependability. The efficiency of dialysis machine is relevant in assuring a proper dialysis adequacy.
topic Hemodialysis
Dialysis adequacy
Preventive maintenance
Overall equipment effectiveness
url http://www.sjkdt.org/article.asp?issn=1319-2442;year=2009;volume=20;issue=1;spage=49;epage=56;aulast=Azar
work_keys_str_mv AT azarahmad theinfluenceofmaintenancequalityofhemodialysismachinesonhemodialysisefficiency
AT azarahmad influenceofmaintenancequalityofhemodialysismachinesonhemodialysisefficiency
_version_ 1725368228410032128