Urban form and life-cycle energy consumption: Case studies at the city scale

By combining daily (operations) and embodied energy demands, this work estimates life-cycle energy demands for residents and workers in different city settings. Using life-cycle analyses (LCAs) of different neighborhood types in Austin, Texas, this analysis fabricates five different city types, refl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brice G. Nichols, Kara Kockelman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Minnesota 2015-05-01
Series:Journal of Transport and Land Use
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jtlu.org/index.php/jtlu/article/view/598
id doaj-e0488b15ed0449dc9db8e5e66877c184
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e0488b15ed0449dc9db8e5e66877c1842021-08-31T04:38:13ZengUniversity of MinnesotaJournal of Transport and Land Use1938-78492015-05-018310.5198/jtlu.2015.598Urban form and life-cycle energy consumption: Case studies at the city scaleBrice G. Nichols0Kara Kockelman1University of TexasUniversity of TexasBy combining daily (operations) and embodied energy demands, this work estimates life-cycle energy demands for residents and workers in different city settings. Using life-cycle analyses (LCAs) of different neighborhood types in Austin, Texas, this analysis fabricates five different city types, reflecting actual accessibility and resident and employment density profiles. Five residential and three commercial neighborhood types are distributed across 16-kilometer (10-mile) radius regions, with demographics held constant, for comparability. As expected, per-capita daily energy demands decrease with increased resident and employment density. Interestingly, embodied energy savings via increases in density are substantial. Though embodied energy makes up only 10-20 percent of total life-cycle energy, per-capita savings via density suggest it should be included in planning analyses. Overall, average life-cycle per-capita energy use ranges from 140 gigajoule (GJ)/ year/capita in the least dense Orlando-style setting to around 90 GJ/ year/capita in the maximum-density scenario, corresponding to a 35 percent reduction in per-capita energy demand. Energy reductions for Phoenix, Austin, and Seattle settings (relative to an Orlando-based de- sign) are 18, 22, and 24 percent per-capita, respectively. Results provide a rare view of how total annual energy demands in both residential and commercial sectors are affected by density.https://www.jtlu.org/index.php/jtlu/article/view/598TransportDevelopment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Brice G. Nichols
Kara Kockelman
spellingShingle Brice G. Nichols
Kara Kockelman
Urban form and life-cycle energy consumption: Case studies at the city scale
Journal of Transport and Land Use
Transport
Development
author_facet Brice G. Nichols
Kara Kockelman
author_sort Brice G. Nichols
title Urban form and life-cycle energy consumption: Case studies at the city scale
title_short Urban form and life-cycle energy consumption: Case studies at the city scale
title_full Urban form and life-cycle energy consumption: Case studies at the city scale
title_fullStr Urban form and life-cycle energy consumption: Case studies at the city scale
title_full_unstemmed Urban form and life-cycle energy consumption: Case studies at the city scale
title_sort urban form and life-cycle energy consumption: case studies at the city scale
publisher University of Minnesota
series Journal of Transport and Land Use
issn 1938-7849
publishDate 2015-05-01
description By combining daily (operations) and embodied energy demands, this work estimates life-cycle energy demands for residents and workers in different city settings. Using life-cycle analyses (LCAs) of different neighborhood types in Austin, Texas, this analysis fabricates five different city types, reflecting actual accessibility and resident and employment density profiles. Five residential and three commercial neighborhood types are distributed across 16-kilometer (10-mile) radius regions, with demographics held constant, for comparability. As expected, per-capita daily energy demands decrease with increased resident and employment density. Interestingly, embodied energy savings via increases in density are substantial. Though embodied energy makes up only 10-20 percent of total life-cycle energy, per-capita savings via density suggest it should be included in planning analyses. Overall, average life-cycle per-capita energy use ranges from 140 gigajoule (GJ)/ year/capita in the least dense Orlando-style setting to around 90 GJ/ year/capita in the maximum-density scenario, corresponding to a 35 percent reduction in per-capita energy demand. Energy reductions for Phoenix, Austin, and Seattle settings (relative to an Orlando-based de- sign) are 18, 22, and 24 percent per-capita, respectively. Results provide a rare view of how total annual energy demands in both residential and commercial sectors are affected by density.
topic Transport
Development
url https://www.jtlu.org/index.php/jtlu/article/view/598
work_keys_str_mv AT bricegnichols urbanformandlifecycleenergyconsumptioncasestudiesatthecityscale
AT karakockelman urbanformandlifecycleenergyconsumptioncasestudiesatthecityscale
_version_ 1721184469479587840