Alendronate-Associated Femoral Insufficiency Fractures and Femoral Stress Reactions

Purpose. To report characteristics and outcomes of 8 patients who underwent intramedullary nailing for alendronate-associated femoral insufficiency fractures. Methods. Records of 7 women and one man aged 54 to 91 (mean, 72) years who underwent intramedullary nailing for spontaneous or low-energy, al...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kemble Wang, Afshin Moaveni, Adam Dowrick, Susan Liew
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2011-04-01
Series:Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901101900121
id doaj-e07c1b56f6904736952c3948f775d742
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e07c1b56f6904736952c3948f775d7422020-11-25T03:21:38ZengSAGE PublishingJournal of Orthopaedic Surgery2309-49902011-04-011910.1177/230949901101900121Alendronate-Associated Femoral Insufficiency Fractures and Femoral Stress ReactionsKemble WangAfshin MoaveniAdam DowrickSusan LiewPurpose. To report characteristics and outcomes of 8 patients who underwent intramedullary nailing for alendronate-associated femoral insufficiency fractures. Methods. Records of 7 women and one man aged 54 to 91 (mean, 72) years who underwent intramedullary nailing for spontaneous or low-energy, alendronate-associated femoral insufficiency fractures were retrospectively reviewed. Contralateral femurs were assessed for stress reactions. Results. All patients had at least 4 (range, 4–10) years of alendronate use. Five patients had experienced prodromal pain lasting one day to 5 months. Five patients had received concurrent glucocorticoid therapy. At the 6-month follow-up, 6 patients had bony union, one had hypertrophic non-union and underwent dynamisation and nail exchange and eventually achieved union at month 16, and one had fixation loss and underwent nail exchange and bone grafting and eventually achieved union at month 9. In 3 patients, the contralateral femurs were painful, and cortical stress reactions were noted. They underwent prophylactic intramedullary nailing. Radiographs showed no evidence of new stress reactions or fractures. Conclusion. Contralateral involvement in patients with alendronate-associated femoral insufficiency fractures is not uncommon. Early prophylactic intramedullary nailing may provide effective pain relief and prevent progression to a fracture.https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901101900121
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kemble Wang
Afshin Moaveni
Adam Dowrick
Susan Liew
spellingShingle Kemble Wang
Afshin Moaveni
Adam Dowrick
Susan Liew
Alendronate-Associated Femoral Insufficiency Fractures and Femoral Stress Reactions
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
author_facet Kemble Wang
Afshin Moaveni
Adam Dowrick
Susan Liew
author_sort Kemble Wang
title Alendronate-Associated Femoral Insufficiency Fractures and Femoral Stress Reactions
title_short Alendronate-Associated Femoral Insufficiency Fractures and Femoral Stress Reactions
title_full Alendronate-Associated Femoral Insufficiency Fractures and Femoral Stress Reactions
title_fullStr Alendronate-Associated Femoral Insufficiency Fractures and Femoral Stress Reactions
title_full_unstemmed Alendronate-Associated Femoral Insufficiency Fractures and Femoral Stress Reactions
title_sort alendronate-associated femoral insufficiency fractures and femoral stress reactions
publisher SAGE Publishing
series Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery
issn 2309-4990
publishDate 2011-04-01
description Purpose. To report characteristics and outcomes of 8 patients who underwent intramedullary nailing for alendronate-associated femoral insufficiency fractures. Methods. Records of 7 women and one man aged 54 to 91 (mean, 72) years who underwent intramedullary nailing for spontaneous or low-energy, alendronate-associated femoral insufficiency fractures were retrospectively reviewed. Contralateral femurs were assessed for stress reactions. Results. All patients had at least 4 (range, 4–10) years of alendronate use. Five patients had experienced prodromal pain lasting one day to 5 months. Five patients had received concurrent glucocorticoid therapy. At the 6-month follow-up, 6 patients had bony union, one had hypertrophic non-union and underwent dynamisation and nail exchange and eventually achieved union at month 16, and one had fixation loss and underwent nail exchange and bone grafting and eventually achieved union at month 9. In 3 patients, the contralateral femurs were painful, and cortical stress reactions were noted. They underwent prophylactic intramedullary nailing. Radiographs showed no evidence of new stress reactions or fractures. Conclusion. Contralateral involvement in patients with alendronate-associated femoral insufficiency fractures is not uncommon. Early prophylactic intramedullary nailing may provide effective pain relief and prevent progression to a fracture.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/230949901101900121
work_keys_str_mv AT kemblewang alendronateassociatedfemoralinsufficiencyfracturesandfemoralstressreactions
AT afshinmoaveni alendronateassociatedfemoralinsufficiencyfracturesandfemoralstressreactions
AT adamdowrick alendronateassociatedfemoralinsufficiencyfracturesandfemoralstressreactions
AT susanliew alendronateassociatedfemoralinsufficiencyfracturesandfemoralstressreactions
_version_ 1724613573140807680