Efficacy of 13.3 mg/24 h versus 4.6 mg/24 h rivastigmine patch on activities of daily living in severe Alzheimer’s disease

Objective: Investigate efficacy of 13.3 mg/24 h rivastigmine patch in patients with severe Alzheimer’s disease on Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study–Activities of Daily Living Scale–Severe Impairment Version items and domains. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the 24-week, randomized, double-bli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joseph L Micca, James E Galvin, Drew M Velting, Xiangyi Meng
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2014-12-01
Series:SAGE Open Medicine
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312114561569
Description
Summary:Objective: Investigate efficacy of 13.3 mg/24 h rivastigmine patch in patients with severe Alzheimer’s disease on Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study–Activities of Daily Living Scale–Severe Impairment Version items and domains. Methods: Retrospective analysis of the 24-week, randomized, double-blind ACTivities of daily living and cognitION (ACTION) study, using factor analysis to establish “best fit” for Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study–Activities of Daily Living Scale–Severe Impairment Version items into domains. Treatment differences (13.3 vs 4.6 mg/24 h patch) on items and domains were assessed. Results: Overall, 632 patients provided Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study–Activities of Daily Living Scale–Severe Impairment Version data. Factor analysis yielded four domains. The 13.3 versus 4.6 mg/24 h patch demonstrated significantly greater efficacy on “Daily function” ( p  = 0.038), supported by greatest effect sizes on items within this domain, and trend toward greater efficacy on “Communication” ( p  = 0.052). No significant between-group differences were observed on “Independence” ( p  = 0.600) or “Environment” ( p  = 0.261). Conclusion: The 13.3 mg/24 h patch was superior to 4.6 mg/24 h patch on “Daily function” in severe Alzheimer’s disease.
ISSN:2050-3121