Review Essay: Conversation Analysis Versus Other Approaches to Discourse

This review discusses a recent book by Robin WOOFFITT in which conversation analysis (CA) is confronted with some other analytic approaches to "discourse." The author uses the term discourse analysis in a rather specific way, as a label for an analytic tradition that has become prominent i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Paul Ten Have
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: FQS 2006-03-01
Series:Forum: Qualitative Social Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/100
id doaj-e0daa4fcae884a80801013990681fcbe
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e0daa4fcae884a80801013990681fcbe2020-11-24T22:20:23ZdeuFQS Forum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272006-03-017299Review Essay: Conversation Analysis Versus Other Approaches to DiscoursePaul Ten Have0University of AmsterdamThis review discusses a recent book by Robin WOOFFITT in which conversation analysis (CA) is confronted with some other analytic approaches to "discourse." The author uses the term discourse analysis in a rather specific way, as a label for an analytic tradition that has become prominent in (social) psychology in the UK. Two other traditions, critical discourse analysis and Foucauldian discourse analysis are also discussed later in the book. The major criticism raised in the review is that the book’s usefulness is limited by its restriction to approaches currently en vogue in Britain and its selective treatment of CA. In an Epilogue the issues raised in the book are discussed in a wider perspective. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs060239http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/100conversation analysisdiscourse analysisdiscursive psychologycritical discourse analysisFoucauldian discourse analysis
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paul Ten Have
spellingShingle Paul Ten Have
Review Essay: Conversation Analysis Versus Other Approaches to Discourse
Forum: Qualitative Social Research
conversation analysis
discourse analysis
discursive psychology
critical discourse analysis
Foucauldian discourse analysis
author_facet Paul Ten Have
author_sort Paul Ten Have
title Review Essay: Conversation Analysis Versus Other Approaches to Discourse
title_short Review Essay: Conversation Analysis Versus Other Approaches to Discourse
title_full Review Essay: Conversation Analysis Versus Other Approaches to Discourse
title_fullStr Review Essay: Conversation Analysis Versus Other Approaches to Discourse
title_full_unstemmed Review Essay: Conversation Analysis Versus Other Approaches to Discourse
title_sort review essay: conversation analysis versus other approaches to discourse
publisher FQS
series Forum: Qualitative Social Research
issn 1438-5627
publishDate 2006-03-01
description This review discusses a recent book by Robin WOOFFITT in which conversation analysis (CA) is confronted with some other analytic approaches to "discourse." The author uses the term discourse analysis in a rather specific way, as a label for an analytic tradition that has become prominent in (social) psychology in the UK. Two other traditions, critical discourse analysis and Foucauldian discourse analysis are also discussed later in the book. The major criticism raised in the review is that the book’s usefulness is limited by its restriction to approaches currently en vogue in Britain and its selective treatment of CA. In an Epilogue the issues raised in the book are discussed in a wider perspective. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs060239
topic conversation analysis
discourse analysis
discursive psychology
critical discourse analysis
Foucauldian discourse analysis
url http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/100
work_keys_str_mv AT paultenhave reviewessayconversationanalysisversusotherapproachestodiscourse
_version_ 1725775403118755840