LA REGULACIÓN ESTATUTARIA DEL PODER JUDICIAL Y SU TRATAMIENTO EN LA STC 31/2010

The object of analysis for this article is the judgment carried out by the Constitutional Court in Ruling 31/2010 of the challenges to Section III of the Statute of Autonomy of Catalonia, in relation to the Judicial Power in the Community. After briefly identifying the lines of the argument of this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miguel Ángel Cabellos Espiérrez, Manuel Gerpe Landín
Format: Article
Language:Catalan
Published: Institut d'Estudis de l'Autogovern 2011-03-01
Series:Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www10.gencat.cat/drep/binaris/_reaf12_Gerpe_Cabellos_tcm112-146928.pdf
id doaj-e117178422f442a7af304893e91e8f8f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e117178422f442a7af304893e91e8f8f2021-03-02T05:15:51ZcatInstitut d'Estudis de l'AutogovernRevista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals1886-26322011-03-0112302330LA REGULACIÓN ESTATUTARIA DEL PODER JUDICIAL Y SU TRATAMIENTO EN LA STC 31/2010Miguel Ángel Cabellos EspiérrezManuel Gerpe LandínThe object of analysis for this article is the judgment carried out by the Constitutional Court in Ruling 31/2010 of the challenges to Section III of the Statute of Autonomy of Catalonia, in relation to the Judicial Power in the Community. After briefly identifying the lines of the argument of this appeal,as well as the response to it by the public prosecutor and the autonomous government and parliament, the theoretical bases on which the Courtwill base its decision are examined, analysing the debatable elements involved in those bases. This is followed by a consideration of the particular understanding that the Constitutional Court has of the relationship betweenthe Statutes and the Organic Law of Judiciary (LOPJ), on the basis of which it has declared a large number of the points being challenged to beconstitutional. It also shows how this understanding varies when articles related to the Council of Justice are indicted, some of which are declaredunconstitutional in a very curious manner.http://www10.gencat.cat/drep/binaris/_reaf12_Gerpe_Cabellos_tcm112-146928.pdfJudiciaryAdministration of JusticeStatute of autonomyGeneral Council of the Spanish Judiciary (CGPJ)Councils of Justice
collection DOAJ
language Catalan
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Miguel Ángel Cabellos Espiérrez
Manuel Gerpe Landín
spellingShingle Miguel Ángel Cabellos Espiérrez
Manuel Gerpe Landín
LA REGULACIÓN ESTATUTARIA DEL PODER JUDICIAL Y SU TRATAMIENTO EN LA STC 31/2010
Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals
Judiciary
Administration of Justice
Statute of autonomy
General Council of the Spanish Judiciary (CGPJ)
Councils of Justice
author_facet Miguel Ángel Cabellos Espiérrez
Manuel Gerpe Landín
author_sort Miguel Ángel Cabellos Espiérrez
title LA REGULACIÓN ESTATUTARIA DEL PODER JUDICIAL Y SU TRATAMIENTO EN LA STC 31/2010
title_short LA REGULACIÓN ESTATUTARIA DEL PODER JUDICIAL Y SU TRATAMIENTO EN LA STC 31/2010
title_full LA REGULACIÓN ESTATUTARIA DEL PODER JUDICIAL Y SU TRATAMIENTO EN LA STC 31/2010
title_fullStr LA REGULACIÓN ESTATUTARIA DEL PODER JUDICIAL Y SU TRATAMIENTO EN LA STC 31/2010
title_full_unstemmed LA REGULACIÓN ESTATUTARIA DEL PODER JUDICIAL Y SU TRATAMIENTO EN LA STC 31/2010
title_sort la regulación estatutaria del poder judicial y su tratamiento en la stc 31/2010
publisher Institut d'Estudis de l'Autogovern
series Revista d'Estudis Autonòmics i Federals
issn 1886-2632
publishDate 2011-03-01
description The object of analysis for this article is the judgment carried out by the Constitutional Court in Ruling 31/2010 of the challenges to Section III of the Statute of Autonomy of Catalonia, in relation to the Judicial Power in the Community. After briefly identifying the lines of the argument of this appeal,as well as the response to it by the public prosecutor and the autonomous government and parliament, the theoretical bases on which the Courtwill base its decision are examined, analysing the debatable elements involved in those bases. This is followed by a consideration of the particular understanding that the Constitutional Court has of the relationship betweenthe Statutes and the Organic Law of Judiciary (LOPJ), on the basis of which it has declared a large number of the points being challenged to beconstitutional. It also shows how this understanding varies when articles related to the Council of Justice are indicted, some of which are declaredunconstitutional in a very curious manner.
topic Judiciary
Administration of Justice
Statute of autonomy
General Council of the Spanish Judiciary (CGPJ)
Councils of Justice
url http://www10.gencat.cat/drep/binaris/_reaf12_Gerpe_Cabellos_tcm112-146928.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT miguelangelcabellosespierrez laregulacionestatutariadelpoderjudicialysutratamientoenlastc312010
AT manuelgerpelandin laregulacionestatutariadelpoderjudicialysutratamientoenlastc312010
_version_ 1724242626898558976