What I Learnt About How I Learnt About Behavioral Economists

This paper is a discussion of the role of the experimental methods and the dissemination practices of behavioral economists in capturing public imagination. The paper is framed by auto biographical accounts of two episodes in my own exploration of behavioral economics as a topic of study: participat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zara Thokozani Kamwendo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Social Studies of Science 2020-10-01
Series:Engaging Science, Technology, and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:https://estsjournal.org/index.php/ests/article/view/343/301
id doaj-e13bbb213dee458db69ec6b21b56a60a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e13bbb213dee458db69ec6b21b56a60a2021-08-20T11:27:03ZengSociety for Social Studies of ScienceEngaging Science, Technology, and Society2413-80532020-10-01639141010.17351/ests2020.343What I Learnt About How I Learnt About Behavioral EconomistsZara Thokozani Kamwendo0ST. JOHN’S COLLEGE, DURHAM UNIVERSITYThis paper is a discussion of the role of the experimental methods and the dissemination practices of behavioral economists in capturing public imagination. The paper is framed by auto biographical accounts of two episodes in my own exploration of behavioral economics as a topic of study: participating in a MOOC on the basics of behavioral economics and sharing my work in progress to a group of staff and students in Singapore. Drawing on Shapin and Shaffer’s notion of “virtual witnesses” (Shapin and Shaffer 1985) I develop the argument that a consequence of the dissemination practices of the Heuristics and Biases Program is the creation of both “virtual subjects” and “virtual experimenters.” I then give an account of Thaler’s use of rationality and Kuhnian paradigm shifts as a rhetorical device to persuade mainstream economists and policy makers of the value of behavioral economics and to establish the narrative of behavioral economics as critics of neo-classical economics. I argue that the reflexive approach adds to accounts of the success of behavioral economics as a story of persuasive techniques of behavioral economists embedded in their practices of experimentation and dissemination. https://estsjournal.org/index.php/ests/article/view/343/301behavioral economicsheuristics and biasesdisseminationreflexivityvirtual subject
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zara Thokozani Kamwendo
spellingShingle Zara Thokozani Kamwendo
What I Learnt About How I Learnt About Behavioral Economists
Engaging Science, Technology, and Society
behavioral economics
heuristics and biases
dissemination
reflexivity
virtual subject
author_facet Zara Thokozani Kamwendo
author_sort Zara Thokozani Kamwendo
title What I Learnt About How I Learnt About Behavioral Economists
title_short What I Learnt About How I Learnt About Behavioral Economists
title_full What I Learnt About How I Learnt About Behavioral Economists
title_fullStr What I Learnt About How I Learnt About Behavioral Economists
title_full_unstemmed What I Learnt About How I Learnt About Behavioral Economists
title_sort what i learnt about how i learnt about behavioral economists
publisher Society for Social Studies of Science
series Engaging Science, Technology, and Society
issn 2413-8053
publishDate 2020-10-01
description This paper is a discussion of the role of the experimental methods and the dissemination practices of behavioral economists in capturing public imagination. The paper is framed by auto biographical accounts of two episodes in my own exploration of behavioral economics as a topic of study: participating in a MOOC on the basics of behavioral economics and sharing my work in progress to a group of staff and students in Singapore. Drawing on Shapin and Shaffer’s notion of “virtual witnesses” (Shapin and Shaffer 1985) I develop the argument that a consequence of the dissemination practices of the Heuristics and Biases Program is the creation of both “virtual subjects” and “virtual experimenters.” I then give an account of Thaler’s use of rationality and Kuhnian paradigm shifts as a rhetorical device to persuade mainstream economists and policy makers of the value of behavioral economics and to establish the narrative of behavioral economics as critics of neo-classical economics. I argue that the reflexive approach adds to accounts of the success of behavioral economics as a story of persuasive techniques of behavioral economists embedded in their practices of experimentation and dissemination.
topic behavioral economics
heuristics and biases
dissemination
reflexivity
virtual subject
url https://estsjournal.org/index.php/ests/article/view/343/301
work_keys_str_mv AT zarathokozanikamwendo whatilearntabouthowilearntaboutbehavioraleconomists
_version_ 1721201233949097984