On the Permissible Use of Force in a Kantian Dignitarian Moral and Political Setting, Or, Seven Kantian Samurai

On the supposition that one’s ethics and politics are fundamentally dignitarian in a broadly Kantian sense—as specifically opposed to identitarian and capitalist versions of Statism, e.g., neoliberal nation-States, whether democratic or non-democratic—hence fundamentally non-coercive and non-violent...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Robert Hanna, Otto Paans
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Tabriz 2019-10-01
Series:Philosophical Investigations
Subjects:
Online Access:https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_9431_065cfef073fcd058023f3703e052b7ef.pdf
id doaj-e1a35618c193463cadf29a5a12f7c848
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e1a35618c193463cadf29a5a12f7c8482020-11-25T02:31:46ZengUniversity of TabrizPhilosophical Investigations2251-79602423-44192019-10-011328759310.22034/jpiut.2019.35721.24009431On the Permissible Use of Force in a Kantian Dignitarian Moral and Political Setting, Or, Seven Kantian SamuraiRobert Hanna0Otto Paans1University of Colorado, Boulder Department Member, USATechnische Universität Berlin, Institut für Architektur, PhD Student, NetherlandsOn the supposition that one’s ethics and politics are fundamentally dignitarian in a broadly Kantian sense—as specifically opposed to identitarian and capitalist versions of Statism, e.g., neoliberal nation-States, whether democratic or non-democratic—hence fundamentally non-coercive and non-violent, then is self-defense or the defense of innocent others, using force, ever rationally justifiable and morally permissible or obligatory? We think that the answer to this hard question is yes; correspondingly, in this essay we develop and defend a theory about the permissible use of force in a broadly Kantian dignitarian moral and political setting, including its extension to non-violent civil disobedience in the tradition of Martin Luther King, Jr; and perhaps surprisingly, we also import several key insights from Samurai and Martial Arts ethics into our theory.https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_9431_065cfef073fcd058023f3703e052b7ef.pdfdignitarianismstatismidentitarianismkantian ethicsmartin luther kingcivil disobediencesamurai ethics
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Robert Hanna
Otto Paans
spellingShingle Robert Hanna
Otto Paans
On the Permissible Use of Force in a Kantian Dignitarian Moral and Political Setting, Or, Seven Kantian Samurai
Philosophical Investigations
dignitarianism
statism
identitarianism
kantian ethics
martin luther king
civil disobedience
samurai ethics
author_facet Robert Hanna
Otto Paans
author_sort Robert Hanna
title On the Permissible Use of Force in a Kantian Dignitarian Moral and Political Setting, Or, Seven Kantian Samurai
title_short On the Permissible Use of Force in a Kantian Dignitarian Moral and Political Setting, Or, Seven Kantian Samurai
title_full On the Permissible Use of Force in a Kantian Dignitarian Moral and Political Setting, Or, Seven Kantian Samurai
title_fullStr On the Permissible Use of Force in a Kantian Dignitarian Moral and Political Setting, Or, Seven Kantian Samurai
title_full_unstemmed On the Permissible Use of Force in a Kantian Dignitarian Moral and Political Setting, Or, Seven Kantian Samurai
title_sort on the permissible use of force in a kantian dignitarian moral and political setting, or, seven kantian samurai
publisher University of Tabriz
series Philosophical Investigations
issn 2251-7960
2423-4419
publishDate 2019-10-01
description On the supposition that one’s ethics and politics are fundamentally dignitarian in a broadly Kantian sense—as specifically opposed to identitarian and capitalist versions of Statism, e.g., neoliberal nation-States, whether democratic or non-democratic—hence fundamentally non-coercive and non-violent, then is self-defense or the defense of innocent others, using force, ever rationally justifiable and morally permissible or obligatory? We think that the answer to this hard question is yes; correspondingly, in this essay we develop and defend a theory about the permissible use of force in a broadly Kantian dignitarian moral and political setting, including its extension to non-violent civil disobedience in the tradition of Martin Luther King, Jr; and perhaps surprisingly, we also import several key insights from Samurai and Martial Arts ethics into our theory.
topic dignitarianism
statism
identitarianism
kantian ethics
martin luther king
civil disobedience
samurai ethics
url https://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_9431_065cfef073fcd058023f3703e052b7ef.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT roberthanna onthepermissibleuseofforceinakantiandignitarianmoralandpoliticalsettingorsevenkantiansamurai
AT ottopaans onthepermissibleuseofforceinakantiandignitarianmoralandpoliticalsettingorsevenkantiansamurai
_version_ 1724822173892214784