Intrapopulation foraging niche variation between phenotypes and genotypes of Spirit bear populations

Abstract Foraging niche variation within a species can contribute to the maintenance of phenotypic diversity. The multiniche model posits that phenotypes occupying different niches can contribute to the maintenance of balanced polymorphisms. Using coastal populations of black bears (Ursus americanus...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christina N. Service, Travis Ingram, Thomas E. Reimchen, Chris T. Darimont
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-05-01
Series:Ecology and Evolution
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7276
id doaj-e1aa6a6e16734d6ebcc6f25ac8ac8b89
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e1aa6a6e16734d6ebcc6f25ac8ac8b892021-05-19T04:56:22ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582021-05-0111105025503710.1002/ece3.7276Intrapopulation foraging niche variation between phenotypes and genotypes of Spirit bear populationsChristina N. Service0Travis Ingram1Thomas E. Reimchen2Chris T. Darimont3Department of Geography University of Victoria Victoria BC CanadaDepartment of Zoology University of Otago Dunedin New ZealandDepartment of Biology University of Victoria Victoria BC CanadaDepartment of Geography University of Victoria Victoria BC CanadaAbstract Foraging niche variation within a species can contribute to the maintenance of phenotypic diversity. The multiniche model posits that phenotypes occupying different niches can contribute to the maintenance of balanced polymorphisms. Using coastal populations of black bears (Ursus americanus kermodei) from British Columbia, Canada, we examined potential foraging niche divergence between phenotypes (black and white “Spirit” coat color) and between genotypes (black‐coated homozygote and heterozygous). We applied the Bayesian multivariate models, with biotracers of diet (δ13C and δ15N) together comprising the response variable, to draw inference about foraging niche variation. Variance–covariance matrices from multivariate linear mixed‐effect models were visualized as the Bayesian standard ellipses in δ13C and δ15N isotopic space to assess potential seasonal and annual niche variation between phenotypes and genotypes. We did not detect a difference in annual isotopic foraging niche area in comparisons between genotypes or phenotypes. Consistent with previous field experimental and isotopic analyses, however, we found that white phenotype Spirit bears were modestly more enriched in δ15N during the fall foraging season, though with our modest sample sizes these results were not significant. Although also not statistically significant, variation in isotopic niches between genotypes revealed that heterozygotes were moderately more enriched in δ13C along hair segments grown during fall foraging compared with black‐coated homozygotes. To the extent to which the pattern of elevated δ15N and δ13C may signal the consumption of salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.), as well as the influence of salmon consumption on reproductive fitness, these results suggest that black‐coated heterozygotes could have a minor selective advantage in the fall compared with black‐coated homozygotes. More broadly, our multivariate approach, coupled with knowledge of genetic variation underlying a polymorphic trait, provides new insight into the potential role of a multiniche mechanism in maintaining this rare morph of conservation priority in Canada's Great Bear Rainforest and could offer new understanding into polymorphisms in other systems.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7276multiniche polymorphismniche diversitySpirit bearUrsus
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christina N. Service
Travis Ingram
Thomas E. Reimchen
Chris T. Darimont
spellingShingle Christina N. Service
Travis Ingram
Thomas E. Reimchen
Chris T. Darimont
Intrapopulation foraging niche variation between phenotypes and genotypes of Spirit bear populations
Ecology and Evolution
multiniche polymorphism
niche diversity
Spirit bear
Ursus
author_facet Christina N. Service
Travis Ingram
Thomas E. Reimchen
Chris T. Darimont
author_sort Christina N. Service
title Intrapopulation foraging niche variation between phenotypes and genotypes of Spirit bear populations
title_short Intrapopulation foraging niche variation between phenotypes and genotypes of Spirit bear populations
title_full Intrapopulation foraging niche variation between phenotypes and genotypes of Spirit bear populations
title_fullStr Intrapopulation foraging niche variation between phenotypes and genotypes of Spirit bear populations
title_full_unstemmed Intrapopulation foraging niche variation between phenotypes and genotypes of Spirit bear populations
title_sort intrapopulation foraging niche variation between phenotypes and genotypes of spirit bear populations
publisher Wiley
series Ecology and Evolution
issn 2045-7758
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Abstract Foraging niche variation within a species can contribute to the maintenance of phenotypic diversity. The multiniche model posits that phenotypes occupying different niches can contribute to the maintenance of balanced polymorphisms. Using coastal populations of black bears (Ursus americanus kermodei) from British Columbia, Canada, we examined potential foraging niche divergence between phenotypes (black and white “Spirit” coat color) and between genotypes (black‐coated homozygote and heterozygous). We applied the Bayesian multivariate models, with biotracers of diet (δ13C and δ15N) together comprising the response variable, to draw inference about foraging niche variation. Variance–covariance matrices from multivariate linear mixed‐effect models were visualized as the Bayesian standard ellipses in δ13C and δ15N isotopic space to assess potential seasonal and annual niche variation between phenotypes and genotypes. We did not detect a difference in annual isotopic foraging niche area in comparisons between genotypes or phenotypes. Consistent with previous field experimental and isotopic analyses, however, we found that white phenotype Spirit bears were modestly more enriched in δ15N during the fall foraging season, though with our modest sample sizes these results were not significant. Although also not statistically significant, variation in isotopic niches between genotypes revealed that heterozygotes were moderately more enriched in δ13C along hair segments grown during fall foraging compared with black‐coated homozygotes. To the extent to which the pattern of elevated δ15N and δ13C may signal the consumption of salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.), as well as the influence of salmon consumption on reproductive fitness, these results suggest that black‐coated heterozygotes could have a minor selective advantage in the fall compared with black‐coated homozygotes. More broadly, our multivariate approach, coupled with knowledge of genetic variation underlying a polymorphic trait, provides new insight into the potential role of a multiniche mechanism in maintaining this rare morph of conservation priority in Canada's Great Bear Rainforest and could offer new understanding into polymorphisms in other systems.
topic multiniche polymorphism
niche diversity
Spirit bear
Ursus
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7276
work_keys_str_mv AT christinanservice intrapopulationforagingnichevariationbetweenphenotypesandgenotypesofspiritbearpopulations
AT travisingram intrapopulationforagingnichevariationbetweenphenotypesandgenotypesofspiritbearpopulations
AT thomasereimchen intrapopulationforagingnichevariationbetweenphenotypesandgenotypesofspiritbearpopulations
AT christdarimont intrapopulationforagingnichevariationbetweenphenotypesandgenotypesofspiritbearpopulations
_version_ 1721437098152558592