Effects of Filtering the Center of Pressure Feedback Provided in Visually Guided Mediolateral Weight Shifting.

Thirty healthy adults completed a mediolateral weight-shifting balance task in which they were instructed to shift their weight to visually displayed target regions. A model-based filter and three different moving average filters employing 10, 34, and 58 samples were applied to the center of pressur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael W Kennedy, Charles R Crowell, Michael Villano, James P Schmiedeler
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151393
id doaj-e1c99fd9a80f40d4ba7ec39dce14c201
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e1c99fd9a80f40d4ba7ec39dce14c2012021-03-03T19:56:58ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01113e015139310.1371/journal.pone.0151393Effects of Filtering the Center of Pressure Feedback Provided in Visually Guided Mediolateral Weight Shifting.Michael W KennedyCharles R CrowellMichael VillanoJames P SchmiedelerThirty healthy adults completed a mediolateral weight-shifting balance task in which they were instructed to shift their weight to visually displayed target regions. A model-based filter and three different moving average filters employing 10, 34, and 58 samples were applied to the center of pressure visual feedback that guided the activity. The effects of filter selection on both the displayed feedback and the shift performance were examined in terms of shift time and non-minimum phase behavior. Shift time relates to feedback delay and shift speed, whereas non-minimum phase behavior relates to the force applied in shift initiation. Results indicated that increasing the number of samples in moving average filters (indicative of stronger filtering) significantly increases shift speed and shift initiation force. These effects indicate that careful selection and documentation of data filtering is warranted in future work and suggest opportunities for strategic filtering of visual feedback in clinical weight-shifting balance activities in order to improve outcomes based on such feedback.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151393
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael W Kennedy
Charles R Crowell
Michael Villano
James P Schmiedeler
spellingShingle Michael W Kennedy
Charles R Crowell
Michael Villano
James P Schmiedeler
Effects of Filtering the Center of Pressure Feedback Provided in Visually Guided Mediolateral Weight Shifting.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Michael W Kennedy
Charles R Crowell
Michael Villano
James P Schmiedeler
author_sort Michael W Kennedy
title Effects of Filtering the Center of Pressure Feedback Provided in Visually Guided Mediolateral Weight Shifting.
title_short Effects of Filtering the Center of Pressure Feedback Provided in Visually Guided Mediolateral Weight Shifting.
title_full Effects of Filtering the Center of Pressure Feedback Provided in Visually Guided Mediolateral Weight Shifting.
title_fullStr Effects of Filtering the Center of Pressure Feedback Provided in Visually Guided Mediolateral Weight Shifting.
title_full_unstemmed Effects of Filtering the Center of Pressure Feedback Provided in Visually Guided Mediolateral Weight Shifting.
title_sort effects of filtering the center of pressure feedback provided in visually guided mediolateral weight shifting.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Thirty healthy adults completed a mediolateral weight-shifting balance task in which they were instructed to shift their weight to visually displayed target regions. A model-based filter and three different moving average filters employing 10, 34, and 58 samples were applied to the center of pressure visual feedback that guided the activity. The effects of filter selection on both the displayed feedback and the shift performance were examined in terms of shift time and non-minimum phase behavior. Shift time relates to feedback delay and shift speed, whereas non-minimum phase behavior relates to the force applied in shift initiation. Results indicated that increasing the number of samples in moving average filters (indicative of stronger filtering) significantly increases shift speed and shift initiation force. These effects indicate that careful selection and documentation of data filtering is warranted in future work and suggest opportunities for strategic filtering of visual feedback in clinical weight-shifting balance activities in order to improve outcomes based on such feedback.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0151393
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelwkennedy effectsoffilteringthecenterofpressurefeedbackprovidedinvisuallyguidedmediolateralweightshifting
AT charlesrcrowell effectsoffilteringthecenterofpressurefeedbackprovidedinvisuallyguidedmediolateralweightshifting
AT michaelvillano effectsoffilteringthecenterofpressurefeedbackprovidedinvisuallyguidedmediolateralweightshifting
AT jamespschmiedeler effectsoffilteringthecenterofpressurefeedbackprovidedinvisuallyguidedmediolateralweightshifting
_version_ 1714824872835678208