Words, clauses, sentences, and T-units in learner language: Precise and objective units of measure?

In research on learner language complexity, accuracy and fluency (CAF), syntactic complexity is often studied with quantitative measures based on words, clauses, sentences, and T-units. The findings have been mixed, but segmenting learner language into these units of measure has seldom been problema...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Taina Mylläri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: White Rose University Press 2020-08-01
Series:Journal of the European Second Language Association
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.euroslajournal.org/articles/63
id doaj-e1da7e1a6c5a41cc886aad51a106ee9f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e1da7e1a6c5a41cc886aad51a106ee9f2020-11-25T02:30:43ZengWhite Rose University PressJournal of the European Second Language Association2399-91012020-08-014110.22599/jesla.6333Words, clauses, sentences, and T-units in learner language: Precise and objective units of measure?Taina Mylläri0Department of Language and Communication Studies, University of JyväskyläIn research on learner language complexity, accuracy and fluency (CAF), syntactic complexity is often studied with quantitative measures based on words, clauses, sentences, and T-units. The findings have been mixed, but segmenting learner language into these units of measure has seldom been problematised, even if the need for accurate coding is well known. The present study explores words, clauses, sentences, and T-units as production units in written learner language using a corpus of 352 L2 Finnish texts (28,813 words). The results illustrate how written learner language can be hard to fit into the production unit categories, which are essential for the most frequently used quantitative measures of syntactic complexity. On the one hand, the results support calls to include explicit definitions of the units of measure when reporting findings obtained with these quantitative measures. On the other hand, they align with calls to introduce new measures to better gauge the changes in learner language syntax as it develops with increasing language proficiency.https://www.euroslajournal.org/articles/63common reference levelscomplexitylearner finnishlearner writingsegmentation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Taina Mylläri
spellingShingle Taina Mylläri
Words, clauses, sentences, and T-units in learner language: Precise and objective units of measure?
Journal of the European Second Language Association
common reference levels
complexity
learner finnish
learner writing
segmentation
author_facet Taina Mylläri
author_sort Taina Mylläri
title Words, clauses, sentences, and T-units in learner language: Precise and objective units of measure?
title_short Words, clauses, sentences, and T-units in learner language: Precise and objective units of measure?
title_full Words, clauses, sentences, and T-units in learner language: Precise and objective units of measure?
title_fullStr Words, clauses, sentences, and T-units in learner language: Precise and objective units of measure?
title_full_unstemmed Words, clauses, sentences, and T-units in learner language: Precise and objective units of measure?
title_sort words, clauses, sentences, and t-units in learner language: precise and objective units of measure?
publisher White Rose University Press
series Journal of the European Second Language Association
issn 2399-9101
publishDate 2020-08-01
description In research on learner language complexity, accuracy and fluency (CAF), syntactic complexity is often studied with quantitative measures based on words, clauses, sentences, and T-units. The findings have been mixed, but segmenting learner language into these units of measure has seldom been problematised, even if the need for accurate coding is well known. The present study explores words, clauses, sentences, and T-units as production units in written learner language using a corpus of 352 L2 Finnish texts (28,813 words). The results illustrate how written learner language can be hard to fit into the production unit categories, which are essential for the most frequently used quantitative measures of syntactic complexity. On the one hand, the results support calls to include explicit definitions of the units of measure when reporting findings obtained with these quantitative measures. On the other hand, they align with calls to introduce new measures to better gauge the changes in learner language syntax as it develops with increasing language proficiency.
topic common reference levels
complexity
learner finnish
learner writing
segmentation
url https://www.euroslajournal.org/articles/63
work_keys_str_mv AT tainamyllari wordsclausessentencesandtunitsinlearnerlanguagepreciseandobjectiveunitsofmeasure
_version_ 1724828347904557056