Keadilan Restoratif Dan Pembatasan Diversi Pada Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak

Abstract Since 1997 Indonesia possessed a Law specifically regulating child court (Law No. 3 of 1997). The law’s perspective, however, was still based on retributive justice. This was apparent in how the court handles juvenile delinquents.  To provide better protection to the handling of children be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zenny Rezania Dewantary
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Parahyangan Catholic University 2016-12-01
Series:Veritas et Justitia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/veritas/article/view/2269
id doaj-e1f15504f4d9487786316946e274fb0b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e1f15504f4d9487786316946e274fb0b2020-11-25T00:03:33ZengParahyangan Catholic UniversityVeritas et Justitia2460-05552460-44882016-12-012230332610.25123/vej.22692112Keadilan Restoratif Dan Pembatasan Diversi Pada Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana AnakZenny Rezania DewantaryAbstract Since 1997 Indonesia possessed a Law specifically regulating child court (Law No. 3 of 1997). The law’s perspective, however, was still based on retributive justice. This was apparent in how the court handles juvenile delinquents.  To provide better protection to the handling of children before criminal courts, the government amended Law No. 3 of 1997 by Law No. 11 of 2012 re. Juvenile Court System. This new law was founded upon the theory of restorative justice and provide for diversion.  Diversion is used to prevent children from being sent to prison and in general purports to improve societal condition. This article discusses problems related to the use of diversion. One recommendation offered is that diversion should be taken into consideration without discrimination, not only in the case the penal sanction is below 7 years (imprisonment) but also above this number. In deciding the need for diversion, while also taking into consideration the seriousness of the crime committed, expediency should also be a deciding factor.http://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/veritas/article/view/2269Juvenile Court SystemDiversionRestorative Justice
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zenny Rezania Dewantary
spellingShingle Zenny Rezania Dewantary
Keadilan Restoratif Dan Pembatasan Diversi Pada Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak
Veritas et Justitia
Juvenile Court System
Diversion
Restorative Justice
author_facet Zenny Rezania Dewantary
author_sort Zenny Rezania Dewantary
title Keadilan Restoratif Dan Pembatasan Diversi Pada Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak
title_short Keadilan Restoratif Dan Pembatasan Diversi Pada Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak
title_full Keadilan Restoratif Dan Pembatasan Diversi Pada Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak
title_fullStr Keadilan Restoratif Dan Pembatasan Diversi Pada Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak
title_full_unstemmed Keadilan Restoratif Dan Pembatasan Diversi Pada Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 Tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak
title_sort keadilan restoratif dan pembatasan diversi pada undang-undang nomor 11 tahun 2012 tentang sistem peradilan pidana anak
publisher Parahyangan Catholic University
series Veritas et Justitia
issn 2460-0555
2460-4488
publishDate 2016-12-01
description Abstract Since 1997 Indonesia possessed a Law specifically regulating child court (Law No. 3 of 1997). The law’s perspective, however, was still based on retributive justice. This was apparent in how the court handles juvenile delinquents.  To provide better protection to the handling of children before criminal courts, the government amended Law No. 3 of 1997 by Law No. 11 of 2012 re. Juvenile Court System. This new law was founded upon the theory of restorative justice and provide for diversion.  Diversion is used to prevent children from being sent to prison and in general purports to improve societal condition. This article discusses problems related to the use of diversion. One recommendation offered is that diversion should be taken into consideration without discrimination, not only in the case the penal sanction is below 7 years (imprisonment) but also above this number. In deciding the need for diversion, while also taking into consideration the seriousness of the crime committed, expediency should also be a deciding factor.
topic Juvenile Court System
Diversion
Restorative Justice
url http://journal.unpar.ac.id/index.php/veritas/article/view/2269
work_keys_str_mv AT zennyrezaniadewantary keadilanrestoratifdanpembatasandiversipadaundangundangnomor11tahun2012tentangsistemperadilanpidanaanak
_version_ 1725433325368115200