A Performance Evaluation of Exact and Approximate Match Kernels for Object Recognition

Local features have repeatedly shown their effectiveness for object recognition during the last years, and they have consequently become the preferred descriptor for this type of problems. The solution of the correspondence problem is traditionally approached with exact or approximate techniques. I...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Barbara Caputo, Luo Jie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Computer Vision Center Press 2010-02-01
Series:ELCVIA Electronic Letters on Computer Vision and Image Analysis
Subjects:
Online Access:https://elcvia.cvc.uab.es/article/view/350
id doaj-e2008c32c6764ed4954166a331f48e81
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e2008c32c6764ed4954166a331f48e812021-09-18T12:40:05ZengComputer Vision Center PressELCVIA Electronic Letters on Computer Vision and Image Analysis1577-50972010-02-018310.5565/rev/elcvia.350176A Performance Evaluation of Exact and Approximate Match Kernels for Object RecognitionBarbara CaputoLuo Jie Local features have repeatedly shown their effectiveness for object recognition during the last years, and they have consequently become the preferred descriptor for this type of problems. The solution of the correspondence problem is traditionally approached with exact or approximate techniques. In this paper we are interested in methods that solve the correspondence problem via the definition of a kernel function that makes it possible to use local features as input to a support vector machine. We single out the match kernel, an exact approach, and the pyramid match kernel, that uses instead an approximate strategy. We present a thorough experimental evaluation of the two methods on three different databases. Results show that the exact method performs consistently better than the approximate one, especially for the object identification task, when training on a decreasing number of images. Based on this findings and on the computational cost of each approach, we suggest some criteria for choosing between the two kernels given the application at hand.   https://elcvia.cvc.uab.es/article/view/350Object Description and RecognitionSupport Vector Machines and kernels
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Barbara Caputo
Luo Jie
spellingShingle Barbara Caputo
Luo Jie
A Performance Evaluation of Exact and Approximate Match Kernels for Object Recognition
ELCVIA Electronic Letters on Computer Vision and Image Analysis
Object Description and Recognition
Support Vector Machines and kernels
author_facet Barbara Caputo
Luo Jie
author_sort Barbara Caputo
title A Performance Evaluation of Exact and Approximate Match Kernels for Object Recognition
title_short A Performance Evaluation of Exact and Approximate Match Kernels for Object Recognition
title_full A Performance Evaluation of Exact and Approximate Match Kernels for Object Recognition
title_fullStr A Performance Evaluation of Exact and Approximate Match Kernels for Object Recognition
title_full_unstemmed A Performance Evaluation of Exact and Approximate Match Kernels for Object Recognition
title_sort performance evaluation of exact and approximate match kernels for object recognition
publisher Computer Vision Center Press
series ELCVIA Electronic Letters on Computer Vision and Image Analysis
issn 1577-5097
publishDate 2010-02-01
description Local features have repeatedly shown their effectiveness for object recognition during the last years, and they have consequently become the preferred descriptor for this type of problems. The solution of the correspondence problem is traditionally approached with exact or approximate techniques. In this paper we are interested in methods that solve the correspondence problem via the definition of a kernel function that makes it possible to use local features as input to a support vector machine. We single out the match kernel, an exact approach, and the pyramid match kernel, that uses instead an approximate strategy. We present a thorough experimental evaluation of the two methods on three different databases. Results show that the exact method performs consistently better than the approximate one, especially for the object identification task, when training on a decreasing number of images. Based on this findings and on the computational cost of each approach, we suggest some criteria for choosing between the two kernels given the application at hand.  
topic Object Description and Recognition
Support Vector Machines and kernels
url https://elcvia.cvc.uab.es/article/view/350
work_keys_str_mv AT barbaracaputo aperformanceevaluationofexactandapproximatematchkernelsforobjectrecognition
AT luojie aperformanceevaluationofexactandapproximatematchkernelsforobjectrecognition
AT barbaracaputo performanceevaluationofexactandapproximatematchkernelsforobjectrecognition
AT luojie performanceevaluationofexactandapproximatematchkernelsforobjectrecognition
_version_ 1717376937157984256