Minimally invasive versus conventional fixation of tracer in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion surgery: a randomized control trial
Abstract Background This study evaluated the minimal invasiveness, safety, and accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement procedure using a modified tracer fixation device. Methods Patients were randomly assigned to conventional fixation group (25 patients) and modified fixation group (27 pa...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-03239-9 |
id |
doaj-e2057b2e9b8a4712b805104f3a4cb96c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e2057b2e9b8a4712b805104f3a4cb96c2020-11-25T02:03:06ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742020-04-012111910.1186/s12891-020-03239-9Minimally invasive versus conventional fixation of tracer in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion surgery: a randomized control trialLi Yongqi0Zhang Dehua1Wu Hongzi2Zhang Ke3Yang Rui4Fang Zhou5Wang Shaobo6Liao Yi7Department of Orthopedics, The Karamay Central HospitalDepartment of Orthopedics, The Karamay Central HospitalDepartment of Orthopedics, The Karamay Central HospitalDepartment of Orthopedics, The Karamay Central HospitalDepartment of Orthopedics, The Karamay Central HospitalDepartment of Orthopedics, The Karamay Central HospitalDepartment of Orthopedics, The Karamay Central HospitalDepartment of Orthopedics, The Karamay Central HospitalAbstract Background This study evaluated the minimal invasiveness, safety, and accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement procedure using a modified tracer fixation device. Methods Patients were randomly assigned to conventional fixation group (25 patients) and modified fixation group (27 patients). Results No baseline statistical difference was observed between the groups (P > 0.05). The length of unnecessary incision, amount of bleeding, and fixation duration for tracer fixation respectively were 6.08 ± 1.02 mm, 1.46 ± 0.84 ml, and 1.56 ± 0.32 min in the modified fixation group and 40.28 ± 8.52 mm, 12.02 ± 2.24 ml, and 5.08 ± 1.06 min in the conventional group. The difference between both groups was significant (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference between the two groups was observed in terms of the accuracy of pedicle screw placement (P > 0.05). Conclusions The modified minimally invasive procedure for tracer fixation results in minimal trauma and is simple, reliable, and highly safe. Additionally, the procedure does not compromise the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Thus, it has great clinical applicable value. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: Registration number, ChiCTR1800016680 ; Registration Date, 15/06/2018.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-03239-9ModifiedMinimally invasiveTracer fixationRobotPedicle screw placement |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Li Yongqi Zhang Dehua Wu Hongzi Zhang Ke Yang Rui Fang Zhou Wang Shaobo Liao Yi |
spellingShingle |
Li Yongqi Zhang Dehua Wu Hongzi Zhang Ke Yang Rui Fang Zhou Wang Shaobo Liao Yi Minimally invasive versus conventional fixation of tracer in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion surgery: a randomized control trial BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders Modified Minimally invasive Tracer fixation Robot Pedicle screw placement |
author_facet |
Li Yongqi Zhang Dehua Wu Hongzi Zhang Ke Yang Rui Fang Zhou Wang Shaobo Liao Yi |
author_sort |
Li Yongqi |
title |
Minimally invasive versus conventional fixation of tracer in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion surgery: a randomized control trial |
title_short |
Minimally invasive versus conventional fixation of tracer in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion surgery: a randomized control trial |
title_full |
Minimally invasive versus conventional fixation of tracer in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion surgery: a randomized control trial |
title_fullStr |
Minimally invasive versus conventional fixation of tracer in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion surgery: a randomized control trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Minimally invasive versus conventional fixation of tracer in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion surgery: a randomized control trial |
title_sort |
minimally invasive versus conventional fixation of tracer in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion surgery: a randomized control trial |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
issn |
1471-2474 |
publishDate |
2020-04-01 |
description |
Abstract Background This study evaluated the minimal invasiveness, safety, and accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement procedure using a modified tracer fixation device. Methods Patients were randomly assigned to conventional fixation group (25 patients) and modified fixation group (27 patients). Results No baseline statistical difference was observed between the groups (P > 0.05). The length of unnecessary incision, amount of bleeding, and fixation duration for tracer fixation respectively were 6.08 ± 1.02 mm, 1.46 ± 0.84 ml, and 1.56 ± 0.32 min in the modified fixation group and 40.28 ± 8.52 mm, 12.02 ± 2.24 ml, and 5.08 ± 1.06 min in the conventional group. The difference between both groups was significant (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference between the two groups was observed in terms of the accuracy of pedicle screw placement (P > 0.05). Conclusions The modified minimally invasive procedure for tracer fixation results in minimal trauma and is simple, reliable, and highly safe. Additionally, the procedure does not compromise the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Thus, it has great clinical applicable value. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: Registration number, ChiCTR1800016680 ; Registration Date, 15/06/2018. |
topic |
Modified Minimally invasive Tracer fixation Robot Pedicle screw placement |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12891-020-03239-9 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT liyongqi minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalfixationoftracerinrobotassistedpediclescrewinsertionsurgeryarandomizedcontroltrial AT zhangdehua minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalfixationoftracerinrobotassistedpediclescrewinsertionsurgeryarandomizedcontroltrial AT wuhongzi minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalfixationoftracerinrobotassistedpediclescrewinsertionsurgeryarandomizedcontroltrial AT zhangke minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalfixationoftracerinrobotassistedpediclescrewinsertionsurgeryarandomizedcontroltrial AT yangrui minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalfixationoftracerinrobotassistedpediclescrewinsertionsurgeryarandomizedcontroltrial AT fangzhou minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalfixationoftracerinrobotassistedpediclescrewinsertionsurgeryarandomizedcontroltrial AT wangshaobo minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalfixationoftracerinrobotassistedpediclescrewinsertionsurgeryarandomizedcontroltrial AT liaoyi minimallyinvasiveversusconventionalfixationoftracerinrobotassistedpediclescrewinsertionsurgeryarandomizedcontroltrial |
_version_ |
1724949561224462336 |