Mechanical evaluation of quad-helix appliance made of low-nickel stainless steel wire

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that there is no difference between stainless steel and low-nickel stainless steel wires as regards mechanical behavior. Force, resilience, and elastic modulus produced by Quad-helix appliances made of 0.032-inch and 0.036-inch wires...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rogério Lacerda dos Santos, Matheus Melo Pithon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dental Press Editora 2013-06-01
Series:Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512013000300007&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-e228cbfddfc54882be9388600f43f849
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e228cbfddfc54882be9388600f43f8492020-11-25T00:09:34ZengDental Press Editora Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics 2177-67092013-06-01183353810.1590/S2176-94512013000300007S2176-94512013000300007Mechanical evaluation of quad-helix appliance made of low-nickel stainless steel wireRogério Lacerda dos Santos0Matheus Melo Pithon1Universidade Federal de Campina GrandeUniversidade Estadual do Sudoeste da BahiaOBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that there is no difference between stainless steel and low-nickel stainless steel wires as regards mechanical behavior. Force, resilience, and elastic modulus produced by Quad-helix appliances made of 0.032-inch and 0.036-inch wires were evaluated. METHODS: Sixty Quad-helix appliances were made, thirty for each type of alloy, being fifteen for each wire thickness, 0.032-in and 0.036-in. All the archwires were submitted to mechanical compression test using an EMIC DL-10000 machine simulating activations of 4, 6, 9, and 12 mm. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with multiple comparisons and Tukey's test were used (p < 0.05) to assess force, resilience, and elastic modulus. RESULTS: Statistically significant difference in the forces generated, resilience and elastic modulus were found between the 0.032-in 0.036-in thicknesses (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Appliances made of low-nickel stainless steel alloy had force, resilience, and elastic modulus similar to those made of stainless steel alloy.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512013000300007&lng=en&tlng=enAparelhos ortodônticosHipersensibilidadeNíquel
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rogério Lacerda dos Santos
Matheus Melo Pithon
spellingShingle Rogério Lacerda dos Santos
Matheus Melo Pithon
Mechanical evaluation of quad-helix appliance made of low-nickel stainless steel wire
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
Aparelhos ortodônticos
Hipersensibilidade
Níquel
author_facet Rogério Lacerda dos Santos
Matheus Melo Pithon
author_sort Rogério Lacerda dos Santos
title Mechanical evaluation of quad-helix appliance made of low-nickel stainless steel wire
title_short Mechanical evaluation of quad-helix appliance made of low-nickel stainless steel wire
title_full Mechanical evaluation of quad-helix appliance made of low-nickel stainless steel wire
title_fullStr Mechanical evaluation of quad-helix appliance made of low-nickel stainless steel wire
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical evaluation of quad-helix appliance made of low-nickel stainless steel wire
title_sort mechanical evaluation of quad-helix appliance made of low-nickel stainless steel wire
publisher Dental Press Editora
series Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
issn 2177-6709
publishDate 2013-06-01
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that there is no difference between stainless steel and low-nickel stainless steel wires as regards mechanical behavior. Force, resilience, and elastic modulus produced by Quad-helix appliances made of 0.032-inch and 0.036-inch wires were evaluated. METHODS: Sixty Quad-helix appliances were made, thirty for each type of alloy, being fifteen for each wire thickness, 0.032-in and 0.036-in. All the archwires were submitted to mechanical compression test using an EMIC DL-10000 machine simulating activations of 4, 6, 9, and 12 mm. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with multiple comparisons and Tukey's test were used (p < 0.05) to assess force, resilience, and elastic modulus. RESULTS: Statistically significant difference in the forces generated, resilience and elastic modulus were found between the 0.032-in 0.036-in thicknesses (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Appliances made of low-nickel stainless steel alloy had force, resilience, and elastic modulus similar to those made of stainless steel alloy.
topic Aparelhos ortodônticos
Hipersensibilidade
Níquel
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2176-94512013000300007&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT rogeriolacerdadossantos mechanicalevaluationofquadhelixappliancemadeoflownickelstainlesssteelwire
AT matheusmelopithon mechanicalevaluationofquadhelixappliancemadeoflownickelstainlesssteelwire
_version_ 1725411271602339840