Dynamics of necromass in woody Australian ecosystems

Abstract Litterfall (LF) is the major contributor to aboveground necromass in ecosystems. Litter decomposition or litter decay (LD) then offsets deposition in LF, with the balance of LF and LD determining the standing litter (SL). SL together with fine and coarse woody debris (FWD, CWD) are the larg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mathias Neumann, John Turner, Tom Lewis, Lachie McCaw, Gary Cook, Mark A. Adams
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-08-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3693
id doaj-e24c35ba41a143fab54a713e6bdb9f80
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e24c35ba41a143fab54a713e6bdb9f802021-08-27T02:22:40ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252021-08-01128n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.3693Dynamics of necromass in woody Australian ecosystemsMathias Neumann0John Turner1Tom Lewis2Lachie McCaw3Gary Cook4Mark A. Adams5Faculty of Science, Engineering and Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne Victoria 3122 AustraliaForsci Pty Beecroft New South Wales 2119 AustraliaDepartment of Agriculture and Fisheries Sippy Downs Queensland 4556 AustraliaDepartment of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions Manjimup Western Australia 6258 AustraliaCSIRO Land and Water Darwin Northern Territory 0828 AustraliaFaculty of Science, Engineering and Technology Swinburne University of Technology Melbourne Victoria 3122 AustraliaAbstract Litterfall (LF) is the major contributor to aboveground necromass in ecosystems. Litter decomposition or litter decay (LD) then offsets deposition in LF, with the balance of LF and LD determining the standing litter (SL). SL together with fine and coarse woody debris (FWD, CWD) are the largest necromass pools. The interactions of LF, SL, and LD at continental scales reflect carbon and nutrient cycling and other ecosystem processes. We compiled data on leaf, twig (<2.6 cm), and other material (mostly bark and reproductive tissue) for SL and LF for the fire‐prone Australian continent, where SL is also a major “fuel load” and important for fire spread and fire intensity. We extracted data from 498 published and unpublished works (1825 LF observations; n SL = 3914; n LD = 629). We used Olson’s (mass‐balance) approach (k ˜ LF/SL) to calculate LD for sites long undisturbed with both LF and SL data. We compiled LF and SL by component (leaves, twigs, other material) and metainformation such as sampling location, tree species, or time since fire from literature and/or scientists. Most data were available from warm‐seasonal (36% for SL) and cool‐wet (31%) climates, linking the locations of our data with a bio‐climate classification. Warm‐wet (20%) and hot‐seasonal (8%) climates followed, while other climate zones each contributed <2% of the data. Across all climatic zones, average SL (1100 g/m2) was roughly twice that of LF (468 g·m−2·yr−1). SL was greatest in cold climates (2334 g/m2), compared to warm‐wet (1168 g/m2) and hot‐seasonal conditions (499 g/m2). Important drivers of SL are LD (e.g., slow under cold conditions) and fire frequency. Olson’s k varied with type of decomposing material (“composition”). For example, across the continent, k ˜ 1.942 yr−1 for leaves but was 0.504 yr−1 for twigs. SL varied strongly in composition according to climate type (e.g., seasonal vs. wet climates). Robust models of necromass dynamics must distinguish between the litter components (such as leaves and twigs) and consider the complex and non‐linear effects of climate, stand structure, and stand history on litterfall and decomposition.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3693Acaciacarbon sequestrationEucalyptusfire riskforest floorfuel load
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mathias Neumann
John Turner
Tom Lewis
Lachie McCaw
Gary Cook
Mark A. Adams
spellingShingle Mathias Neumann
John Turner
Tom Lewis
Lachie McCaw
Gary Cook
Mark A. Adams
Dynamics of necromass in woody Australian ecosystems
Ecosphere
Acacia
carbon sequestration
Eucalyptus
fire risk
forest floor
fuel load
author_facet Mathias Neumann
John Turner
Tom Lewis
Lachie McCaw
Gary Cook
Mark A. Adams
author_sort Mathias Neumann
title Dynamics of necromass in woody Australian ecosystems
title_short Dynamics of necromass in woody Australian ecosystems
title_full Dynamics of necromass in woody Australian ecosystems
title_fullStr Dynamics of necromass in woody Australian ecosystems
title_full_unstemmed Dynamics of necromass in woody Australian ecosystems
title_sort dynamics of necromass in woody australian ecosystems
publisher Wiley
series Ecosphere
issn 2150-8925
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Abstract Litterfall (LF) is the major contributor to aboveground necromass in ecosystems. Litter decomposition or litter decay (LD) then offsets deposition in LF, with the balance of LF and LD determining the standing litter (SL). SL together with fine and coarse woody debris (FWD, CWD) are the largest necromass pools. The interactions of LF, SL, and LD at continental scales reflect carbon and nutrient cycling and other ecosystem processes. We compiled data on leaf, twig (<2.6 cm), and other material (mostly bark and reproductive tissue) for SL and LF for the fire‐prone Australian continent, where SL is also a major “fuel load” and important for fire spread and fire intensity. We extracted data from 498 published and unpublished works (1825 LF observations; n SL = 3914; n LD = 629). We used Olson’s (mass‐balance) approach (k ˜ LF/SL) to calculate LD for sites long undisturbed with both LF and SL data. We compiled LF and SL by component (leaves, twigs, other material) and metainformation such as sampling location, tree species, or time since fire from literature and/or scientists. Most data were available from warm‐seasonal (36% for SL) and cool‐wet (31%) climates, linking the locations of our data with a bio‐climate classification. Warm‐wet (20%) and hot‐seasonal (8%) climates followed, while other climate zones each contributed <2% of the data. Across all climatic zones, average SL (1100 g/m2) was roughly twice that of LF (468 g·m−2·yr−1). SL was greatest in cold climates (2334 g/m2), compared to warm‐wet (1168 g/m2) and hot‐seasonal conditions (499 g/m2). Important drivers of SL are LD (e.g., slow under cold conditions) and fire frequency. Olson’s k varied with type of decomposing material (“composition”). For example, across the continent, k ˜ 1.942 yr−1 for leaves but was 0.504 yr−1 for twigs. SL varied strongly in composition according to climate type (e.g., seasonal vs. wet climates). Robust models of necromass dynamics must distinguish between the litter components (such as leaves and twigs) and consider the complex and non‐linear effects of climate, stand structure, and stand history on litterfall and decomposition.
topic Acacia
carbon sequestration
Eucalyptus
fire risk
forest floor
fuel load
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3693
work_keys_str_mv AT mathiasneumann dynamicsofnecromassinwoodyaustralianecosystems
AT johnturner dynamicsofnecromassinwoodyaustralianecosystems
AT tomlewis dynamicsofnecromassinwoodyaustralianecosystems
AT lachiemccaw dynamicsofnecromassinwoodyaustralianecosystems
AT garycook dynamicsofnecromassinwoodyaustralianecosystems
AT markaadams dynamicsofnecromassinwoodyaustralianecosystems
_version_ 1721188389202427904