Micro-Hydropower in Nepal: Analysing the Project Process to Understand Drivers that Strengthen and Weaken Sustainability

Evaluating the sustainable operation of community-owned and community-operated renewable energy projects is complex. The development of a project often depends on the actions of diverse stakeholders, including the government, industry and communities. Throughout the project cycle, these interrelated...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joe Butchers, Sam Williamson, Julian Booker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1582
id doaj-e27e8057078a461fa30f48a8e9c422f4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e27e8057078a461fa30f48a8e9c422f42021-02-03T00:06:53ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502021-02-01131582158210.3390/su13031582Micro-Hydropower in Nepal: Analysing the Project Process to Understand Drivers that Strengthen and Weaken SustainabilityJoe Butchers0Sam Williamson1Julian Booker2Electrical Energy Management Group, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TR, UKElectrical Energy Management Group, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TR, UKElectrical Energy Management Group, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TR, UKEvaluating the sustainable operation of community-owned and community-operated renewable energy projects is complex. The development of a project often depends on the actions of diverse stakeholders, including the government, industry and communities. Throughout the project cycle, these interrelated actions impact the sustainability of the project. In this paper, the typical project cycle of a micro-hydropower plant in Nepal is used to demonstrate that key events throughout the project cycle affect a plant’s ability to operate sustainably. Through a critical analysis of the available literature, policy and project documentation and interviews with manufacturers, drivers that affect the sustainability of plants are found. Examples include weak specification of civil components during tendering, quality control issues during manufacture, poor quality of construction and trained operators leaving their position. Opportunities to minimise both the occurrence and the severity of threats to sustainability are identified. For the micro-hydropower industry in Nepal, recommendations are made for specific actions by the relevant stakeholders at appropriate moments in the project cycle. More broadly, the findings demonstrate that the complex nature of developing community energy projects requires a holistic consideration of the complete project process.https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1582stakeholdercommunityhydropowermini-gridNepal
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Joe Butchers
Sam Williamson
Julian Booker
spellingShingle Joe Butchers
Sam Williamson
Julian Booker
Micro-Hydropower in Nepal: Analysing the Project Process to Understand Drivers that Strengthen and Weaken Sustainability
Sustainability
stakeholder
community
hydropower
mini-grid
Nepal
author_facet Joe Butchers
Sam Williamson
Julian Booker
author_sort Joe Butchers
title Micro-Hydropower in Nepal: Analysing the Project Process to Understand Drivers that Strengthen and Weaken Sustainability
title_short Micro-Hydropower in Nepal: Analysing the Project Process to Understand Drivers that Strengthen and Weaken Sustainability
title_full Micro-Hydropower in Nepal: Analysing the Project Process to Understand Drivers that Strengthen and Weaken Sustainability
title_fullStr Micro-Hydropower in Nepal: Analysing the Project Process to Understand Drivers that Strengthen and Weaken Sustainability
title_full_unstemmed Micro-Hydropower in Nepal: Analysing the Project Process to Understand Drivers that Strengthen and Weaken Sustainability
title_sort micro-hydropower in nepal: analysing the project process to understand drivers that strengthen and weaken sustainability
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Evaluating the sustainable operation of community-owned and community-operated renewable energy projects is complex. The development of a project often depends on the actions of diverse stakeholders, including the government, industry and communities. Throughout the project cycle, these interrelated actions impact the sustainability of the project. In this paper, the typical project cycle of a micro-hydropower plant in Nepal is used to demonstrate that key events throughout the project cycle affect a plant’s ability to operate sustainably. Through a critical analysis of the available literature, policy and project documentation and interviews with manufacturers, drivers that affect the sustainability of plants are found. Examples include weak specification of civil components during tendering, quality control issues during manufacture, poor quality of construction and trained operators leaving their position. Opportunities to minimise both the occurrence and the severity of threats to sustainability are identified. For the micro-hydropower industry in Nepal, recommendations are made for specific actions by the relevant stakeholders at appropriate moments in the project cycle. More broadly, the findings demonstrate that the complex nature of developing community energy projects requires a holistic consideration of the complete project process.
topic stakeholder
community
hydropower
mini-grid
Nepal
url https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/3/1582
work_keys_str_mv AT joebutchers microhydropowerinnepalanalysingtheprojectprocesstounderstanddriversthatstrengthenandweakensustainability
AT samwilliamson microhydropowerinnepalanalysingtheprojectprocesstounderstanddriversthatstrengthenandweakensustainability
AT julianbooker microhydropowerinnepalanalysingtheprojectprocesstounderstanddriversthatstrengthenandweakensustainability
_version_ 1724290230710697984