Comparative study of conventional versus torsional phacoemulsification in management of hard nucleus

Background Phacoemulsification acoenergy and shortening the phacotime can decrease this risk. Aim The aim of this work is to compare the safety and the efficiency of phacoemulsification using conventional and torsional ultrasound modalities for hard nucleus cataracts. Settings and design This was a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shereen H.H Salman, Mervat S Mourad, Rafek M ElGhazawy, Rafaat A Rihan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2021-01-01
Series:Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jeos.eg.net/article.asp?issn=2090-0686;year=2021;volume=114;issue=1;spage=1;epage=12;aulast=Salman
id doaj-e282ededd15e4fdfa55f9a07461d9a01
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e282ededd15e4fdfa55f9a07461d9a012021-04-20T09:28:35ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society2090-06862314-66482021-01-01114111210.4103/ejos.ejos_43_20Comparative study of conventional versus torsional phacoemulsification in management of hard nucleusShereen H.H SalmanMervat S MouradRafek M ElGhazawyRafaat A RihanBackground Phacoemulsification acoenergy and shortening the phacotime can decrease this risk. Aim The aim of this work is to compare the safety and the efficiency of phacoemulsification using conventional and torsional ultrasound modalities for hard nucleus cataracts. Settings and design This was a prospective randomized interventional study. Patients and methods A total of 30 eyes of 29 patients having hard nuclear cataract (grades IV and V) were divided into two groups. Group A included 15 eyes whose cataract was operated on by conventional phacoemulsification using the Infiniti machine. Group B included 15 eyes whose cataract was operated on by torsional phacoemulsification using the OZil technology of the Infiniti machine. Intraoperative ultrasound time and cumulative dissipated energy were recorded. Postoperative central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured at days 1, 7, and 30, and specular microscopy was done at 1 month. Statistical analysis The collected data were coded, tabulated, and statistically analyzed. Results The mean ultrasound time and cumulative dissipated energy and the amount of irrigating fluid were significantly higher in group A. There was a highly significant decrease in endothelial cell count (ECC) in both groups. ECC was significantly lower in the conventional group than in the torsional group at 1 month postoperatively. CCT in both groups was significantly increased at day 1 and then decreased at 1 week and 1 month but was still significantly higher than the preoperative level. CCT became higher in the conventional group than in the torsional group at all follow-up times, but this was significant only at day 1 and week 1 and not significant at 1 month. Conclusion Both ultrasound modalities can be used in hard nucleus phacoemulsification. However, the torsional ultrasound proved to be safer. The choice between these technologies is of particular importance when operating eyes with low ECC.http://www.jeos.eg.net/article.asp?issn=2090-0686;year=2021;volume=114;issue=1;spage=1;epage=12;aulast=Salmanconventional phacoemulsificationhard cataracthard nucleustorsional phacoemulsification
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Shereen H.H Salman
Mervat S Mourad
Rafek M ElGhazawy
Rafaat A Rihan
spellingShingle Shereen H.H Salman
Mervat S Mourad
Rafek M ElGhazawy
Rafaat A Rihan
Comparative study of conventional versus torsional phacoemulsification in management of hard nucleus
Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society
conventional phacoemulsification
hard cataract
hard nucleus
torsional phacoemulsification
author_facet Shereen H.H Salman
Mervat S Mourad
Rafek M ElGhazawy
Rafaat A Rihan
author_sort Shereen H.H Salman
title Comparative study of conventional versus torsional phacoemulsification in management of hard nucleus
title_short Comparative study of conventional versus torsional phacoemulsification in management of hard nucleus
title_full Comparative study of conventional versus torsional phacoemulsification in management of hard nucleus
title_fullStr Comparative study of conventional versus torsional phacoemulsification in management of hard nucleus
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of conventional versus torsional phacoemulsification in management of hard nucleus
title_sort comparative study of conventional versus torsional phacoemulsification in management of hard nucleus
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society
issn 2090-0686
2314-6648
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Background Phacoemulsification acoenergy and shortening the phacotime can decrease this risk. Aim The aim of this work is to compare the safety and the efficiency of phacoemulsification using conventional and torsional ultrasound modalities for hard nucleus cataracts. Settings and design This was a prospective randomized interventional study. Patients and methods A total of 30 eyes of 29 patients having hard nuclear cataract (grades IV and V) were divided into two groups. Group A included 15 eyes whose cataract was operated on by conventional phacoemulsification using the Infiniti machine. Group B included 15 eyes whose cataract was operated on by torsional phacoemulsification using the OZil technology of the Infiniti machine. Intraoperative ultrasound time and cumulative dissipated energy were recorded. Postoperative central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured at days 1, 7, and 30, and specular microscopy was done at 1 month. Statistical analysis The collected data were coded, tabulated, and statistically analyzed. Results The mean ultrasound time and cumulative dissipated energy and the amount of irrigating fluid were significantly higher in group A. There was a highly significant decrease in endothelial cell count (ECC) in both groups. ECC was significantly lower in the conventional group than in the torsional group at 1 month postoperatively. CCT in both groups was significantly increased at day 1 and then decreased at 1 week and 1 month but was still significantly higher than the preoperative level. CCT became higher in the conventional group than in the torsional group at all follow-up times, but this was significant only at day 1 and week 1 and not significant at 1 month. Conclusion Both ultrasound modalities can be used in hard nucleus phacoemulsification. However, the torsional ultrasound proved to be safer. The choice between these technologies is of particular importance when operating eyes with low ECC.
topic conventional phacoemulsification
hard cataract
hard nucleus
torsional phacoemulsification
url http://www.jeos.eg.net/article.asp?issn=2090-0686;year=2021;volume=114;issue=1;spage=1;epage=12;aulast=Salman
work_keys_str_mv AT shereenhhsalman comparativestudyofconventionalversustorsionalphacoemulsificationinmanagementofhardnucleus
AT mervatsmourad comparativestudyofconventionalversustorsionalphacoemulsificationinmanagementofhardnucleus
AT rafekmelghazawy comparativestudyofconventionalversustorsionalphacoemulsificationinmanagementofhardnucleus
AT rafaatarihan comparativestudyofconventionalversustorsionalphacoemulsificationinmanagementofhardnucleus
_version_ 1721518115143024640