Spatial Separation and Working Memory Capacity Affect Selective Visual Attention in the Periphery

The current study aimed to examine the effects of spatial separation and working memory capacity on selective visual attention. We investigated differences in the ability to identify the two covertly attended stimuli that appeared either along one of the meridians (e.g., both along the horizontal) o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stefanie Klatt, Nicholas J. Smeeton
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.692963/full
id doaj-e2a71a15048e452d89590fd1717697cf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e2a71a15048e452d89590fd1717697cf2021-09-16T05:19:09ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-09-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.692963692963Spatial Separation and Working Memory Capacity Affect Selective Visual Attention in the PeripheryStefanie Klatt0Stefanie Klatt1Stefanie Klatt2Nicholas J. Smeeton3Institute of Sports Science, University of Rostock, Rostock, GermanySchool of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Eastbourne, United KingdomInstitute of Sports Science, University of Rostock, Rostock, GermanySchool of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Brighton, Eastbourne, United KingdomThe current study aimed to examine the effects of spatial separation and working memory capacity on selective visual attention. We investigated differences in the ability to identify the two covertly attended stimuli that appeared either along one of the meridians (e.g., both along the horizontal) or along two of the meridians (e.g., one along the horizontal and one along the vertical) in the attention-window task. Two visual stimuli in the periphery could be perceived along wider extents of the attentional focus’ meridians (horizontal, vertical, and diagonal) when they were located along the same meridian (e.g., horizontal) compared to two different ones (e.g., horizontal and vertical). Subjects with high working memory capacity outperformed subjects with lower working memory capacity in both conditions and stimuli presented on two meridians were less accurately perceived. The findings support the proposal that individual differences in working memory capacity are important for selective spatial visual attention.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.692963/fullallocation taskattention windowcontrolled attentionobject recognitionvisual field
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stefanie Klatt
Stefanie Klatt
Stefanie Klatt
Nicholas J. Smeeton
spellingShingle Stefanie Klatt
Stefanie Klatt
Stefanie Klatt
Nicholas J. Smeeton
Spatial Separation and Working Memory Capacity Affect Selective Visual Attention in the Periphery
Frontiers in Psychology
allocation task
attention window
controlled attention
object recognition
visual field
author_facet Stefanie Klatt
Stefanie Klatt
Stefanie Klatt
Nicholas J. Smeeton
author_sort Stefanie Klatt
title Spatial Separation and Working Memory Capacity Affect Selective Visual Attention in the Periphery
title_short Spatial Separation and Working Memory Capacity Affect Selective Visual Attention in the Periphery
title_full Spatial Separation and Working Memory Capacity Affect Selective Visual Attention in the Periphery
title_fullStr Spatial Separation and Working Memory Capacity Affect Selective Visual Attention in the Periphery
title_full_unstemmed Spatial Separation and Working Memory Capacity Affect Selective Visual Attention in the Periphery
title_sort spatial separation and working memory capacity affect selective visual attention in the periphery
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2021-09-01
description The current study aimed to examine the effects of spatial separation and working memory capacity on selective visual attention. We investigated differences in the ability to identify the two covertly attended stimuli that appeared either along one of the meridians (e.g., both along the horizontal) or along two of the meridians (e.g., one along the horizontal and one along the vertical) in the attention-window task. Two visual stimuli in the periphery could be perceived along wider extents of the attentional focus’ meridians (horizontal, vertical, and diagonal) when they were located along the same meridian (e.g., horizontal) compared to two different ones (e.g., horizontal and vertical). Subjects with high working memory capacity outperformed subjects with lower working memory capacity in both conditions and stimuli presented on two meridians were less accurately perceived. The findings support the proposal that individual differences in working memory capacity are important for selective spatial visual attention.
topic allocation task
attention window
controlled attention
object recognition
visual field
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.692963/full
work_keys_str_mv AT stefanieklatt spatialseparationandworkingmemorycapacityaffectselectivevisualattentionintheperiphery
AT stefanieklatt spatialseparationandworkingmemorycapacityaffectselectivevisualattentionintheperiphery
AT stefanieklatt spatialseparationandworkingmemorycapacityaffectselectivevisualattentionintheperiphery
AT nicholasjsmeeton spatialseparationandworkingmemorycapacityaffectselectivevisualattentionintheperiphery
_version_ 1717378350533574656