Treating refractory obsessive–compulsive disorder with transcranial direct current stimulation: An open label study

Abstract Background Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is a complex disorder with 40%–60% of patients' refractory to treatment. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to induce potent and long‐lasting effects on cortical excitability. The aim of the present clinical tria...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ghina Harika‐Germaneau, Damien Heit, Armand Chatard, Berangere Thirioux, Nicolas Langbour, Nemat Jaafari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-07-01
Series:Brain and Behavior
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1648
id doaj-e2dc0c6ac36440a5bd6457d69fc93304
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e2dc0c6ac36440a5bd6457d69fc933042020-11-25T03:22:47ZengWileyBrain and Behavior2162-32792020-07-01107n/an/a10.1002/brb3.1648Treating refractory obsessive–compulsive disorder with transcranial direct current stimulation: An open label studyGhina Harika‐Germaneau0Damien Heit1Armand Chatard2Berangere Thirioux3Nicolas Langbour4Nemat Jaafari5Unité de Recherché Clinique Intersectorielle en Psychiatrie à vocation régionale Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit Poitiers FranceUnité de Recherché Clinique Intersectorielle en Psychiatrie à vocation régionale Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit Poitiers FranceUnité de Recherché Clinique Intersectorielle en Psychiatrie à vocation régionale Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit Poitiers FranceUnité de Recherché Clinique Intersectorielle en Psychiatrie à vocation régionale Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit Poitiers FranceUnité de Recherché Clinique Intersectorielle en Psychiatrie à vocation régionale Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit Poitiers FranceUnité de Recherché Clinique Intersectorielle en Psychiatrie à vocation régionale Centre Hospitalier Henri Laborit Poitiers FranceAbstract Background Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is a complex disorder with 40%–60% of patients' refractory to treatment. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to induce potent and long‐lasting effects on cortical excitability. The aim of the present clinical trial was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of cathodal tDCS over the supplementary motor area (SMA) in treatment‐resistant OCD patients. Methods Twenty‐one treatment‐resistant OCD outpatients received 10 sessions of tDCS. Each treatment session consisted of 2 mA stimuli for 30 min. The cathode was positioned over the bilateral SMA and the anode over the right supraorbital area. Patients were evaluated at baseline, end of treatment, one‐month follow‐up, and three‐month follow‐up. Response to treatment was defined as at least a decrease of 35% on the Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) and a score of 2 or less on the Clinical Global Impressions‐Improvement (CGI‐I) between baseline and 1‐month follow‐up. Results There was a significant decrease of YBOCS scores between baseline and one‐month assessment. At one month, five patients (24%) were considered as responders and 3 (15%) at 3 months. We also observed concomitant changes in depressive symptoms, and insight. The treatment was well tolerated. Short‐lasting side effects were reported as localized tingling sensation and skin redness. Conclusion Our results suggest that the use of cathodal tDCS over the SMA and anodal tDCS over the right supraorbital area in OCD treatment‐refractory patients is safe and promising to improve obsessive and compulsive symptoms. Large randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this positive result.https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1648obsessive–compulsive disordersupplementary motor areatDCStreatment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ghina Harika‐Germaneau
Damien Heit
Armand Chatard
Berangere Thirioux
Nicolas Langbour
Nemat Jaafari
spellingShingle Ghina Harika‐Germaneau
Damien Heit
Armand Chatard
Berangere Thirioux
Nicolas Langbour
Nemat Jaafari
Treating refractory obsessive–compulsive disorder with transcranial direct current stimulation: An open label study
Brain and Behavior
obsessive–compulsive disorder
supplementary motor area
tDCS
treatment
author_facet Ghina Harika‐Germaneau
Damien Heit
Armand Chatard
Berangere Thirioux
Nicolas Langbour
Nemat Jaafari
author_sort Ghina Harika‐Germaneau
title Treating refractory obsessive–compulsive disorder with transcranial direct current stimulation: An open label study
title_short Treating refractory obsessive–compulsive disorder with transcranial direct current stimulation: An open label study
title_full Treating refractory obsessive–compulsive disorder with transcranial direct current stimulation: An open label study
title_fullStr Treating refractory obsessive–compulsive disorder with transcranial direct current stimulation: An open label study
title_full_unstemmed Treating refractory obsessive–compulsive disorder with transcranial direct current stimulation: An open label study
title_sort treating refractory obsessive–compulsive disorder with transcranial direct current stimulation: an open label study
publisher Wiley
series Brain and Behavior
issn 2162-3279
publishDate 2020-07-01
description Abstract Background Obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) is a complex disorder with 40%–60% of patients' refractory to treatment. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been shown to induce potent and long‐lasting effects on cortical excitability. The aim of the present clinical trial was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and tolerability of cathodal tDCS over the supplementary motor area (SMA) in treatment‐resistant OCD patients. Methods Twenty‐one treatment‐resistant OCD outpatients received 10 sessions of tDCS. Each treatment session consisted of 2 mA stimuli for 30 min. The cathode was positioned over the bilateral SMA and the anode over the right supraorbital area. Patients were evaluated at baseline, end of treatment, one‐month follow‐up, and three‐month follow‐up. Response to treatment was defined as at least a decrease of 35% on the Yale–Brown Obsessive–Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) and a score of 2 or less on the Clinical Global Impressions‐Improvement (CGI‐I) between baseline and 1‐month follow‐up. Results There was a significant decrease of YBOCS scores between baseline and one‐month assessment. At one month, five patients (24%) were considered as responders and 3 (15%) at 3 months. We also observed concomitant changes in depressive symptoms, and insight. The treatment was well tolerated. Short‐lasting side effects were reported as localized tingling sensation and skin redness. Conclusion Our results suggest that the use of cathodal tDCS over the SMA and anodal tDCS over the right supraorbital area in OCD treatment‐refractory patients is safe and promising to improve obsessive and compulsive symptoms. Large randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this positive result.
topic obsessive–compulsive disorder
supplementary motor area
tDCS
treatment
url https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.1648
work_keys_str_mv AT ghinaharikagermaneau treatingrefractoryobsessivecompulsivedisorderwithtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationanopenlabelstudy
AT damienheit treatingrefractoryobsessivecompulsivedisorderwithtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationanopenlabelstudy
AT armandchatard treatingrefractoryobsessivecompulsivedisorderwithtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationanopenlabelstudy
AT berangerethirioux treatingrefractoryobsessivecompulsivedisorderwithtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationanopenlabelstudy
AT nicolaslangbour treatingrefractoryobsessivecompulsivedisorderwithtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationanopenlabelstudy
AT nematjaafari treatingrefractoryobsessivecompulsivedisorderwithtranscranialdirectcurrentstimulationanopenlabelstudy
_version_ 1724609647692742656