African Agency and EU-ACP Relations beyond the Cotonou Agreement

With the Cotonou Agreement due to expire in 2020, formal negotiations towards a new partnership agreement between the EU and African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) states began in September 2018. Based on the acceptance of the EU’s negotiating mandate, the new arrangement will be primarily organised...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Stephen R Hurt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: UACES 2020-06-01
Series:Journal of Contemporary European Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/1075
id doaj-e2e7936c8f4c4bb3a2f41622a74e6811
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e2e7936c8f4c4bb3a2f41622a74e68112020-11-25T04:08:32ZengUACESJournal of Contemporary European Research1815-347X2020-06-0116210.30950/jcer.v16i2.1075African Agency and EU-ACP Relations beyond the Cotonou AgreementStephen R Hurt0Oxford Brookes University With the Cotonou Agreement due to expire in 2020, formal negotiations towards a new partnership agreement between the EU and African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) states began in September 2018. Based on the acceptance of the EU’s negotiating mandate, the new arrangement will be primarily organised via three specific regional protocols with each of the ACP regions. Meanwhile, the Joint Africa-EU Strategy (JAES) launched in 2007, has seen the African Union (AU) gain increased prominence as an institutional partner of the EU. Given its ambitious pan-African agenda, it adopted an alternative ‘African’ vision for future EU-ACP relations, to the mandate agreed by the ACP states and expressed a willingness to become directly involved in the negotiations. This article contributes an important new case-study to the existing literature on ‘African agency’ in international politics by considering the scope for Africa to exert agency within the post-Cotonou negotiations, given the negotiation of a specific regional compact with Africa. It adopts a structurally embedded view of agency, based on Cox’s understanding of historical structures, as a fit between institutions, ideas and material relations. The central argument is that, in comparison to the negotiation of the Cotonou Agreement two decades ago, there is greater scope for African agency. However, both the ideational and material aspects of Africa’s relationship with the EU, condition the limits to how effective such agency might be. Moreover, tensions at the institutional level between the ACP and AU further undermine the potential for effective African agency. https://jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/1075ACP statesAfrican agencyAfrican UniondevelopmentEuropean Uniontrade
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stephen R Hurt
spellingShingle Stephen R Hurt
African Agency and EU-ACP Relations beyond the Cotonou Agreement
Journal of Contemporary European Research
ACP states
African agency
African Union
development
European Union
trade
author_facet Stephen R Hurt
author_sort Stephen R Hurt
title African Agency and EU-ACP Relations beyond the Cotonou Agreement
title_short African Agency and EU-ACP Relations beyond the Cotonou Agreement
title_full African Agency and EU-ACP Relations beyond the Cotonou Agreement
title_fullStr African Agency and EU-ACP Relations beyond the Cotonou Agreement
title_full_unstemmed African Agency and EU-ACP Relations beyond the Cotonou Agreement
title_sort african agency and eu-acp relations beyond the cotonou agreement
publisher UACES
series Journal of Contemporary European Research
issn 1815-347X
publishDate 2020-06-01
description With the Cotonou Agreement due to expire in 2020, formal negotiations towards a new partnership agreement between the EU and African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) states began in September 2018. Based on the acceptance of the EU’s negotiating mandate, the new arrangement will be primarily organised via three specific regional protocols with each of the ACP regions. Meanwhile, the Joint Africa-EU Strategy (JAES) launched in 2007, has seen the African Union (AU) gain increased prominence as an institutional partner of the EU. Given its ambitious pan-African agenda, it adopted an alternative ‘African’ vision for future EU-ACP relations, to the mandate agreed by the ACP states and expressed a willingness to become directly involved in the negotiations. This article contributes an important new case-study to the existing literature on ‘African agency’ in international politics by considering the scope for Africa to exert agency within the post-Cotonou negotiations, given the negotiation of a specific regional compact with Africa. It adopts a structurally embedded view of agency, based on Cox’s understanding of historical structures, as a fit between institutions, ideas and material relations. The central argument is that, in comparison to the negotiation of the Cotonou Agreement two decades ago, there is greater scope for African agency. However, both the ideational and material aspects of Africa’s relationship with the EU, condition the limits to how effective such agency might be. Moreover, tensions at the institutional level between the ACP and AU further undermine the potential for effective African agency.
topic ACP states
African agency
African Union
development
European Union
trade
url https://jcer.net/index.php/jcer/article/view/1075
work_keys_str_mv AT stephenrhurt africanagencyandeuacprelationsbeyondthecotonouagreement
_version_ 1724425257638428672