How accurate is the local ecological knowledge of protected area practitioners?

The scarcity of environmental data means that other sources of information are needed to complement empirical evidence for conservation decisions. By regularly interacting with their local environment, protected area practitioners may generate local ecological knowledge (LEK) that can be used to inf...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Carly N. Cook, Grant Wardell-Johnson, R. W. Carter, Marc Hockings
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Resilience Alliance 2014-06-01
Series:Ecology and Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss2/art32/
id doaj-e2ea0d32d5e440e49be02c25352b4bbd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e2ea0d32d5e440e49be02c25352b4bbd2020-11-24T22:55:12ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872014-06-011923210.5751/ES-06341-1902326341How accurate is the local ecological knowledge of protected area practitioners?Carly N. Cook0Grant Wardell-Johnson1R. W. Carter2Marc Hockings3University of MelbourneCurtin UniversityUniversity of the Sunshine CoastUniversity of QueenslandThe scarcity of environmental data means that other sources of information are needed to complement empirical evidence for conservation decisions. By regularly interacting with their local environment, protected area practitioners may generate local ecological knowledge (LEK) that can be used to inform management decisions. However, the accuracy of LEK is generally poorly understood, and no studies have assessed the accuracy of practitioners' personal knowledge, leading to a vital gap in our ability to best use this information to guide management. We measured the accuracy of practitioners' knowledge of the vegetation condition within protected areas, relative to an empirical vegetation condition assessment tool. Despite the vast majority of practitioners having only personal experiences to inform their judgments, we found that almost 60% of practitioners made assessments of vegetation condition that matched the empirical condition estimates. When inaccurate, practitioners tended to be conservative in their estimates of condition. Although underestimating condition in this way may waste resources through unnecessary management actions, this is likely to be preferable to overestimating condition and thus failing to protect biodiversity by prematurely ceasing restoration programs. We found no relationship between the accuracy of practitioners' LEK and their level of experience as a practitioner, their level of education, or their gender. We believe that under many circumstances practitioners can be a valuable and cost-effective source of information about the condition of the protected areas they manage, but that more research is needed to understand the wide range of factors that may contribute to how land managers build LEK and how management agencies can assist practitioners to build a good understanding of the conditions in their reserves.http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss2/art32/conservation decisionsenvironmental managementevaluationlocal ecological knowledgevegetation condition
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Carly N. Cook
Grant Wardell-Johnson
R. W. Carter
Marc Hockings
spellingShingle Carly N. Cook
Grant Wardell-Johnson
R. W. Carter
Marc Hockings
How accurate is the local ecological knowledge of protected area practitioners?
Ecology and Society
conservation decisions
environmental management
evaluation
local ecological knowledge
vegetation condition
author_facet Carly N. Cook
Grant Wardell-Johnson
R. W. Carter
Marc Hockings
author_sort Carly N. Cook
title How accurate is the local ecological knowledge of protected area practitioners?
title_short How accurate is the local ecological knowledge of protected area practitioners?
title_full How accurate is the local ecological knowledge of protected area practitioners?
title_fullStr How accurate is the local ecological knowledge of protected area practitioners?
title_full_unstemmed How accurate is the local ecological knowledge of protected area practitioners?
title_sort how accurate is the local ecological knowledge of protected area practitioners?
publisher Resilience Alliance
series Ecology and Society
issn 1708-3087
publishDate 2014-06-01
description The scarcity of environmental data means that other sources of information are needed to complement empirical evidence for conservation decisions. By regularly interacting with their local environment, protected area practitioners may generate local ecological knowledge (LEK) that can be used to inform management decisions. However, the accuracy of LEK is generally poorly understood, and no studies have assessed the accuracy of practitioners' personal knowledge, leading to a vital gap in our ability to best use this information to guide management. We measured the accuracy of practitioners' knowledge of the vegetation condition within protected areas, relative to an empirical vegetation condition assessment tool. Despite the vast majority of practitioners having only personal experiences to inform their judgments, we found that almost 60% of practitioners made assessments of vegetation condition that matched the empirical condition estimates. When inaccurate, practitioners tended to be conservative in their estimates of condition. Although underestimating condition in this way may waste resources through unnecessary management actions, this is likely to be preferable to overestimating condition and thus failing to protect biodiversity by prematurely ceasing restoration programs. We found no relationship between the accuracy of practitioners' LEK and their level of experience as a practitioner, their level of education, or their gender. We believe that under many circumstances practitioners can be a valuable and cost-effective source of information about the condition of the protected areas they manage, but that more research is needed to understand the wide range of factors that may contribute to how land managers build LEK and how management agencies can assist practitioners to build a good understanding of the conditions in their reserves.
topic conservation decisions
environmental management
evaluation
local ecological knowledge
vegetation condition
url http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss2/art32/
work_keys_str_mv AT carlyncook howaccurateisthelocalecologicalknowledgeofprotectedareapractitioners
AT grantwardelljohnson howaccurateisthelocalecologicalknowledgeofprotectedareapractitioners
AT rwcarter howaccurateisthelocalecologicalknowledgeofprotectedareapractitioners
AT marchockings howaccurateisthelocalecologicalknowledgeofprotectedareapractitioners
_version_ 1716393181018324992