The dilemma of repeat weak opioid prescriptions – experiences from swedish GPs

Objective: To explore general practitioners’ (GP) experiences of dealing with requests for the renewal of weak opioid prescriptions for chronic non-cancer pain conditions. Design: Qualitative focus group interviews. Systematic text condensation analysis. Setting and subjects: 15 GPs, 4 GP residents...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elsa Ekelin, Anders Hansson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-04-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2018.1459241
id doaj-e2fced4f99874102a42ec8b1e2d18289
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e2fced4f99874102a42ec8b1e2d182892020-11-25T00:30:01ZengTaylor & Francis GroupScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care0281-34321502-77242018-04-0136218018810.1080/02813432.2018.14592411459241The dilemma of repeat weak opioid prescriptions – experiences from swedish GPsElsa Ekelin0Anders Hansson1Örebro UniversityÖrebro UniversityObjective: To explore general practitioners’ (GP) experiences of dealing with requests for the renewal of weak opioid prescriptions for chronic non-cancer pain conditions. Design: Qualitative focus group interviews. Systematic text condensation analysis. Setting and subjects: 15 GPs, 4 GP residents and 2 interns at two rural and two urban health centres in central Sweden. Main outcome measures: Strategies for handling the dilemma of prescribing weak opioids without seeing the patient. Results: After analysing four focus group interviews we found that requests for prescription renewals for weak opioids provoked adverse feelings in the GP regarding the patient, colleagues or the GP’s inner self and were experienced as a dilemma. To deal with this, the GP could use passive as well as active strategies. Active strategies, like discussing the dilemma with colleagues and creating common routines regarding the renewal of weak opioids, may improve prescription habits and support physicians who want to do what is medically correct. Conclusion: Many GPs feel umcomfortable when prescribing weak opioids without seeing the patient. This qualitative study has identified strategic approaches to deal with that issue.Key points   Opioid prescription for chronic non-cancer pain is known to cause discomfort, feelings of guilt and conflicts for the prescribing doctor. From focus group interviews with GPs we found that to deal with this:   • Doctors can use active strategies, such as confronting the patient or creating common routines together with their colleagues, or…   • They can use passive coping strategies such as accepting the situation, handing over the responsibility to the patient or choosing not to see that there is a problem.   • Opportunities for doctors to discuss prescription routines may be the best way to influence prescription habits.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2018.1459241General practitionersdrug prescriptionscodeinetramadolcognitive dissonanceethicsmedicalresearchqualitative
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Elsa Ekelin
Anders Hansson
spellingShingle Elsa Ekelin
Anders Hansson
The dilemma of repeat weak opioid prescriptions – experiences from swedish GPs
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
General practitioners
drug prescriptions
codeine
tramadol
cognitive dissonance
ethics
medical
research
qualitative
author_facet Elsa Ekelin
Anders Hansson
author_sort Elsa Ekelin
title The dilemma of repeat weak opioid prescriptions – experiences from swedish GPs
title_short The dilemma of repeat weak opioid prescriptions – experiences from swedish GPs
title_full The dilemma of repeat weak opioid prescriptions – experiences from swedish GPs
title_fullStr The dilemma of repeat weak opioid prescriptions – experiences from swedish GPs
title_full_unstemmed The dilemma of repeat weak opioid prescriptions – experiences from swedish GPs
title_sort dilemma of repeat weak opioid prescriptions – experiences from swedish gps
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care
issn 0281-3432
1502-7724
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Objective: To explore general practitioners’ (GP) experiences of dealing with requests for the renewal of weak opioid prescriptions for chronic non-cancer pain conditions. Design: Qualitative focus group interviews. Systematic text condensation analysis. Setting and subjects: 15 GPs, 4 GP residents and 2 interns at two rural and two urban health centres in central Sweden. Main outcome measures: Strategies for handling the dilemma of prescribing weak opioids without seeing the patient. Results: After analysing four focus group interviews we found that requests for prescription renewals for weak opioids provoked adverse feelings in the GP regarding the patient, colleagues or the GP’s inner self and were experienced as a dilemma. To deal with this, the GP could use passive as well as active strategies. Active strategies, like discussing the dilemma with colleagues and creating common routines regarding the renewal of weak opioids, may improve prescription habits and support physicians who want to do what is medically correct. Conclusion: Many GPs feel umcomfortable when prescribing weak opioids without seeing the patient. This qualitative study has identified strategic approaches to deal with that issue.Key points   Opioid prescription for chronic non-cancer pain is known to cause discomfort, feelings of guilt and conflicts for the prescribing doctor. From focus group interviews with GPs we found that to deal with this:   • Doctors can use active strategies, such as confronting the patient or creating common routines together with their colleagues, or…   • They can use passive coping strategies such as accepting the situation, handing over the responsibility to the patient or choosing not to see that there is a problem.   • Opportunities for doctors to discuss prescription routines may be the best way to influence prescription habits.
topic General practitioners
drug prescriptions
codeine
tramadol
cognitive dissonance
ethics
medical
research
qualitative
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02813432.2018.1459241
work_keys_str_mv AT elsaekelin thedilemmaofrepeatweakopioidprescriptionsexperiencesfromswedishgps
AT andershansson thedilemmaofrepeatweakopioidprescriptionsexperiencesfromswedishgps
AT elsaekelin dilemmaofrepeatweakopioidprescriptionsexperiencesfromswedishgps
AT andershansson dilemmaofrepeatweakopioidprescriptionsexperiencesfromswedishgps
_version_ 1725328457762603008