Socio-Technological Influences on Future Water Demands

The traditional water supply management approach focuses on (perceived) community requirements that must be met, but not on community demands, which are variable. Therefore a paradigm-shift is required to the way water is considered. In this paper two fundamental management measures to influence dai...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah M. Zadeh, Dexter V.L. Hunt, Christopher D.F. Rogers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-07-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/6/7/1961
id doaj-e306506272a04bbf9084ffc0796a15df
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e306506272a04bbf9084ffc0796a15df2020-11-25T00:15:20ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412014-07-01671961198410.3390/w6071961w6071961Socio-Technological Influences on Future Water DemandsSarah M. Zadeh0Dexter V.L. Hunt1Christopher D.F. Rogers2School of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B152TT, UKSchool of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B152TT, UKSchool of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B152TT, UKThe traditional water supply management approach focuses on (perceived) community requirements that must be met, but not on community demands, which are variable. Therefore a paradigm-shift is required to the way water is considered. In this paper two fundamental management measures to influence daily water demand and therefore conservation are considered: (1) Technological efficiency measures (i.e., via adopting water-saving devices); and (2) User behaviour (i.e., how users interact with and use the technologies). Through a newly developed futures framework, the individual and combined impact of these approaches within residential and office buildings are examined. Results show each in isolation has similar impacts (i.e., 55% reduction) on domestic water consumption per capita, although the ranges over which user behaviour can operate appears to be far more diverse. Most strikingly, when these measures are considered in combination, greater impact (i.e., 80% reduction) could be achieved. Conclusions are drawn as to how far water demand management, through a dual track approach, can go in terms of reducing indoor water consumption of both residential and office users within the UK. The paper provides philosophical arguments for what else is needed in order to secure sufficient, sustainable water supplies within a “liveable” future.http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/6/7/1961urban water demand managementuser behaviourwater saving devices
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sarah M. Zadeh
Dexter V.L. Hunt
Christopher D.F. Rogers
spellingShingle Sarah M. Zadeh
Dexter V.L. Hunt
Christopher D.F. Rogers
Socio-Technological Influences on Future Water Demands
Water
urban water demand management
user behaviour
water saving devices
author_facet Sarah M. Zadeh
Dexter V.L. Hunt
Christopher D.F. Rogers
author_sort Sarah M. Zadeh
title Socio-Technological Influences on Future Water Demands
title_short Socio-Technological Influences on Future Water Demands
title_full Socio-Technological Influences on Future Water Demands
title_fullStr Socio-Technological Influences on Future Water Demands
title_full_unstemmed Socio-Technological Influences on Future Water Demands
title_sort socio-technological influences on future water demands
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2014-07-01
description The traditional water supply management approach focuses on (perceived) community requirements that must be met, but not on community demands, which are variable. Therefore a paradigm-shift is required to the way water is considered. In this paper two fundamental management measures to influence daily water demand and therefore conservation are considered: (1) Technological efficiency measures (i.e., via adopting water-saving devices); and (2) User behaviour (i.e., how users interact with and use the technologies). Through a newly developed futures framework, the individual and combined impact of these approaches within residential and office buildings are examined. Results show each in isolation has similar impacts (i.e., 55% reduction) on domestic water consumption per capita, although the ranges over which user behaviour can operate appears to be far more diverse. Most strikingly, when these measures are considered in combination, greater impact (i.e., 80% reduction) could be achieved. Conclusions are drawn as to how far water demand management, through a dual track approach, can go in terms of reducing indoor water consumption of both residential and office users within the UK. The paper provides philosophical arguments for what else is needed in order to secure sufficient, sustainable water supplies within a “liveable” future.
topic urban water demand management
user behaviour
water saving devices
url http://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/6/7/1961
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahmzadeh sociotechnologicalinfluencesonfuturewaterdemands
AT dextervlhunt sociotechnologicalinfluencesonfuturewaterdemands
AT christopherdfrogers sociotechnologicalinfluencesonfuturewaterdemands
_version_ 1725387435943133184