RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES TO WARFARIN DOSAGE IN CARDIOVASCULAR HOSPITAL SECTION

Aim. To compare two approaches to warfarin dosage formulation: the standard and with the clinical algorithm.Material and methods. As an approach to warfarin dosage, we have used the method that included clinical properties of the patients. Into the group of the studied approach (intervention group),...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: L. N. Mishchenko, O. V. Averkov, I. G. Gordeev, E. E. Tyulkina, E. P. Pavlikova, N. N. Levchuk, I. G. Pletnikova
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: «FIRMA «SILICEA» LLC  2015-08-01
Series:Российский кардиологический журнал
Subjects:
inr
Online Access:https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/183
id doaj-e3347d03b7dc4497bcb680badbd2d2e5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e3347d03b7dc4497bcb680badbd2d2e52021-07-28T14:02:24Zrus«FIRMA «SILICEA» LLC Российский кардиологический журнал1560-40712618-76202015-08-010811112210.15829/1560-4071-2015-8-111-122183RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES TO WARFARIN DOSAGE IN CARDIOVASCULAR HOSPITAL SECTIONL. N. Mishchenko0O. V. Averkov1I. G. Gordeev2E. E. Tyulkina3E. P. Pavlikova4N. N. Levchuk5I. G. Pletnikova6Russian National Research Medical University named after N.I. Pirogov, MoscowPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow; CCH №15 named after O. M. Filatov, MoscowRussian National Research Medical University named after N.I. Pirogov, MoscowPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow; CCH №15 named after O. M. Filatov, MoscowPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow; CCH №15 named after O. M. Filatov, MoscowCCH №15 named after O. M. Filatov, MoscowCCH №15 named after O. M. Filatov, MoscowAim. To compare two approaches to warfarin dosage formulation: the standard and with the clinical algorithm.Material and methods. As an approach to warfarin dosage, we have used the method that included clinical properties of the patients. Into the group of the studied approach (intervention group), we randomized 31 person, into the standard approach group (controls) — 29 persons with a variety of indications for vitamin K antagonists treatment. Target diapason of International Normalized Ratio (INR) for all the patients was 2,0 to 3,0.Results. A stable target INR in both groups was reached during hospitalization just in a small part of the patients: 19,4% in intervention group and 17,2% in controls. The patients from intervention group reached stable INR by 6,8 days in average, that is almost two times faster than controls, who had their target INR by 12,4 day in average (p<0,05). Part of the INR values higher than 4,0 in intervention group was 3,6%, in control group — 18,2% (p<0,05). Thromboembolic events (strokes, pulmonary embolism repeats) has not developed in both groups. There was one bleeding episode in each of the groups.Conclusion. Opportunities for targeting INR, not dependent on dosing regimen, are quite restricted in inpatient settings. The patients having reached target INR, usage of clinical algorithm of warfarin dosage helped to achieve these values much faster than in standard approach. Prevalence of excessive hypocoagulation while using the algorithm was lesser than in standard group. Key words: ;https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/183warfarinwarfain dose selectioninrstable inrclinical algorithmstandard approach
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author L. N. Mishchenko
O. V. Averkov
I. G. Gordeev
E. E. Tyulkina
E. P. Pavlikova
N. N. Levchuk
I. G. Pletnikova
spellingShingle L. N. Mishchenko
O. V. Averkov
I. G. Gordeev
E. E. Tyulkina
E. P. Pavlikova
N. N. Levchuk
I. G. Pletnikova
RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES TO WARFARIN DOSAGE IN CARDIOVASCULAR HOSPITAL SECTION
Российский кардиологический журнал
warfarin
warfain dose selection
inr
stable inr
clinical algorithm
standard approach
author_facet L. N. Mishchenko
O. V. Averkov
I. G. Gordeev
E. E. Tyulkina
E. P. Pavlikova
N. N. Levchuk
I. G. Pletnikova
author_sort L. N. Mishchenko
title RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES TO WARFARIN DOSAGE IN CARDIOVASCULAR HOSPITAL SECTION
title_short RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES TO WARFARIN DOSAGE IN CARDIOVASCULAR HOSPITAL SECTION
title_full RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES TO WARFARIN DOSAGE IN CARDIOVASCULAR HOSPITAL SECTION
title_fullStr RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES TO WARFARIN DOSAGE IN CARDIOVASCULAR HOSPITAL SECTION
title_full_unstemmed RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES TO WARFARIN DOSAGE IN CARDIOVASCULAR HOSPITAL SECTION
title_sort randomized comparison of two approaches to warfarin dosage in cardiovascular hospital section
publisher «FIRMA «SILICEA» LLC 
series Российский кардиологический журнал
issn 1560-4071
2618-7620
publishDate 2015-08-01
description Aim. To compare two approaches to warfarin dosage formulation: the standard and with the clinical algorithm.Material and methods. As an approach to warfarin dosage, we have used the method that included clinical properties of the patients. Into the group of the studied approach (intervention group), we randomized 31 person, into the standard approach group (controls) — 29 persons with a variety of indications for vitamin K antagonists treatment. Target diapason of International Normalized Ratio (INR) for all the patients was 2,0 to 3,0.Results. A stable target INR in both groups was reached during hospitalization just in a small part of the patients: 19,4% in intervention group and 17,2% in controls. The patients from intervention group reached stable INR by 6,8 days in average, that is almost two times faster than controls, who had their target INR by 12,4 day in average (p<0,05). Part of the INR values higher than 4,0 in intervention group was 3,6%, in control group — 18,2% (p<0,05). Thromboembolic events (strokes, pulmonary embolism repeats) has not developed in both groups. There was one bleeding episode in each of the groups.Conclusion. Opportunities for targeting INR, not dependent on dosing regimen, are quite restricted in inpatient settings. The patients having reached target INR, usage of clinical algorithm of warfarin dosage helped to achieve these values much faster than in standard approach. Prevalence of excessive hypocoagulation while using the algorithm was lesser than in standard group. Key words: ;
topic warfarin
warfain dose selection
inr
stable inr
clinical algorithm
standard approach
url https://russjcardiol.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/183
work_keys_str_mv AT lnmishchenko randomizedcomparisonoftwoapproachestowarfarindosageincardiovascularhospitalsection
AT ovaverkov randomizedcomparisonoftwoapproachestowarfarindosageincardiovascularhospitalsection
AT iggordeev randomizedcomparisonoftwoapproachestowarfarindosageincardiovascularhospitalsection
AT eetyulkina randomizedcomparisonoftwoapproachestowarfarindosageincardiovascularhospitalsection
AT eppavlikova randomizedcomparisonoftwoapproachestowarfarindosageincardiovascularhospitalsection
AT nnlevchuk randomizedcomparisonoftwoapproachestowarfarindosageincardiovascularhospitalsection
AT igpletnikova randomizedcomparisonoftwoapproachestowarfarindosageincardiovascularhospitalsection
_version_ 1721269279963217920