Environmental DNA method for estimating salamander distribution in headwater streams, and a comparison of water sampling methods.

Environmental DNA (eDNA) has recently been used for detecting the distribution of macroorganisms in various aquatic habitats. In this study, we applied an eDNA method to estimate the distribution of the Japanese clawed salamander, Onychodactylus japonicus, in headwater streams. Additionally, we comp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Izumi Katano, Ken Harada, Hideyuki Doi, Rio Souma, Toshifumi Minamoto
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5435165?pdf=render
id doaj-e33d847c39324f08b2033279d6f6bb9f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e33d847c39324f08b2033279d6f6bb9f2020-11-24T20:45:06ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01125e017654110.1371/journal.pone.0176541Environmental DNA method for estimating salamander distribution in headwater streams, and a comparison of water sampling methods.Izumi KatanoKen HaradaHideyuki DoiRio SoumaToshifumi MinamotoEnvironmental DNA (eDNA) has recently been used for detecting the distribution of macroorganisms in various aquatic habitats. In this study, we applied an eDNA method to estimate the distribution of the Japanese clawed salamander, Onychodactylus japonicus, in headwater streams. Additionally, we compared the detection of eDNA and hand-capturing methods used for determining the distribution of O. japonicus. For eDNA detection, we designed a qPCR primer/probe set for O. japonicus using the 12S rRNA region. We detected the eDNA of O. japonicus at all sites (with the exception of one), where we also observed them by hand-capturing. Additionally, we detected eDNA at two sites where we were unable to observe individuals using the hand-capturing method. Moreover, we found that eDNA concentrations and detection rates of the two water sampling areas (stream surface and under stones) were not significantly different, although the eDNA concentration in the water under stones was more varied than that on the surface. We, therefore, conclude that eDNA methods could be used to determine the distribution of macroorganisms inhabiting headwater systems by using samples collected from the surface of the water.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5435165?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Izumi Katano
Ken Harada
Hideyuki Doi
Rio Souma
Toshifumi Minamoto
spellingShingle Izumi Katano
Ken Harada
Hideyuki Doi
Rio Souma
Toshifumi Minamoto
Environmental DNA method for estimating salamander distribution in headwater streams, and a comparison of water sampling methods.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Izumi Katano
Ken Harada
Hideyuki Doi
Rio Souma
Toshifumi Minamoto
author_sort Izumi Katano
title Environmental DNA method for estimating salamander distribution in headwater streams, and a comparison of water sampling methods.
title_short Environmental DNA method for estimating salamander distribution in headwater streams, and a comparison of water sampling methods.
title_full Environmental DNA method for estimating salamander distribution in headwater streams, and a comparison of water sampling methods.
title_fullStr Environmental DNA method for estimating salamander distribution in headwater streams, and a comparison of water sampling methods.
title_full_unstemmed Environmental DNA method for estimating salamander distribution in headwater streams, and a comparison of water sampling methods.
title_sort environmental dna method for estimating salamander distribution in headwater streams, and a comparison of water sampling methods.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Environmental DNA (eDNA) has recently been used for detecting the distribution of macroorganisms in various aquatic habitats. In this study, we applied an eDNA method to estimate the distribution of the Japanese clawed salamander, Onychodactylus japonicus, in headwater streams. Additionally, we compared the detection of eDNA and hand-capturing methods used for determining the distribution of O. japonicus. For eDNA detection, we designed a qPCR primer/probe set for O. japonicus using the 12S rRNA region. We detected the eDNA of O. japonicus at all sites (with the exception of one), where we also observed them by hand-capturing. Additionally, we detected eDNA at two sites where we were unable to observe individuals using the hand-capturing method. Moreover, we found that eDNA concentrations and detection rates of the two water sampling areas (stream surface and under stones) were not significantly different, although the eDNA concentration in the water under stones was more varied than that on the surface. We, therefore, conclude that eDNA methods could be used to determine the distribution of macroorganisms inhabiting headwater systems by using samples collected from the surface of the water.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5435165?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT izumikatano environmentaldnamethodforestimatingsalamanderdistributioninheadwaterstreamsandacomparisonofwatersamplingmethods
AT kenharada environmentaldnamethodforestimatingsalamanderdistributioninheadwaterstreamsandacomparisonofwatersamplingmethods
AT hideyukidoi environmentaldnamethodforestimatingsalamanderdistributioninheadwaterstreamsandacomparisonofwatersamplingmethods
AT riosouma environmentaldnamethodforestimatingsalamanderdistributioninheadwaterstreamsandacomparisonofwatersamplingmethods
AT toshifumiminamoto environmentaldnamethodforestimatingsalamanderdistributioninheadwaterstreamsandacomparisonofwatersamplingmethods
_version_ 1716815384774967296