Student Research & Intrinsic Motivation: Effects of Formative Assessment and the Two-Session Model of Information Literacy Instruction

Formative assessment is a well-established practice within education. However, the traditionally brief format of information literacy instruction has not lent itself well to this important exchange during the learning process.  At the same time, there has been increasing focus within the library lit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maria R. Barefoot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University Library System, University of Pittsburgh 2017-05-01
Series:Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice
Online Access:https://palrap.org/ojs/index.php/palrap/article/view/140
id doaj-e357ee66ba534811a998f1c82db79a9e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e357ee66ba534811a998f1c82db79a9e2020-11-25T02:16:16ZengUniversity Library System, University of PittsburghPennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice2324-78782017-05-0151132510.5195/palrap.2017.14090Student Research & Intrinsic Motivation: Effects of Formative Assessment and the Two-Session Model of Information Literacy InstructionMaria R. Barefoot0Indiana University of PennsylvaniaFormative assessment is a well-established practice within education. However, the traditionally brief format of information literacy instruction has not lent itself well to this important exchange during the learning process.  At the same time, there has been increasing focus within the library literature on affective measures of information literacy instruction, such as motivation and instruction formats that incorporate multiple sessions.  This study seeks to examine the relationship between these concepts by comparing scores from the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) across two groups of Research Writing students: a control group receiving one session of information literacy instruction and an intervention group receiving written formative assessment and two sessions of information literacy instruction.  Statistical significance analyses indicate that the addition of formative assessment and a second instruction session significantly increased motivation for conducting research in the intervention group when compared to students receiving only one session of instruction and no formative assessment.  These findings indicate that librarians can significantly increase students’ intrinsic motivation to conduct research by incorporating formative assessment strategies into a two session model of information literacy instruction.https://palrap.org/ojs/index.php/palrap/article/view/140
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Maria R. Barefoot
spellingShingle Maria R. Barefoot
Student Research & Intrinsic Motivation: Effects of Formative Assessment and the Two-Session Model of Information Literacy Instruction
Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice
author_facet Maria R. Barefoot
author_sort Maria R. Barefoot
title Student Research & Intrinsic Motivation: Effects of Formative Assessment and the Two-Session Model of Information Literacy Instruction
title_short Student Research & Intrinsic Motivation: Effects of Formative Assessment and the Two-Session Model of Information Literacy Instruction
title_full Student Research & Intrinsic Motivation: Effects of Formative Assessment and the Two-Session Model of Information Literacy Instruction
title_fullStr Student Research & Intrinsic Motivation: Effects of Formative Assessment and the Two-Session Model of Information Literacy Instruction
title_full_unstemmed Student Research & Intrinsic Motivation: Effects of Formative Assessment and the Two-Session Model of Information Literacy Instruction
title_sort student research & intrinsic motivation: effects of formative assessment and the two-session model of information literacy instruction
publisher University Library System, University of Pittsburgh
series Pennsylvania Libraries: Research & Practice
issn 2324-7878
publishDate 2017-05-01
description Formative assessment is a well-established practice within education. However, the traditionally brief format of information literacy instruction has not lent itself well to this important exchange during the learning process.  At the same time, there has been increasing focus within the library literature on affective measures of information literacy instruction, such as motivation and instruction formats that incorporate multiple sessions.  This study seeks to examine the relationship between these concepts by comparing scores from the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) across two groups of Research Writing students: a control group receiving one session of information literacy instruction and an intervention group receiving written formative assessment and two sessions of information literacy instruction.  Statistical significance analyses indicate that the addition of formative assessment and a second instruction session significantly increased motivation for conducting research in the intervention group when compared to students receiving only one session of instruction and no formative assessment.  These findings indicate that librarians can significantly increase students’ intrinsic motivation to conduct research by incorporating formative assessment strategies into a two session model of information literacy instruction.
url https://palrap.org/ojs/index.php/palrap/article/view/140
work_keys_str_mv AT mariarbarefoot studentresearchintrinsicmotivationeffectsofformativeassessmentandthetwosessionmodelofinformationliteracyinstruction
_version_ 1724891557125947392