How Often Are Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Said to "Evolve" in the News?

Media plays an important role in informing the general public about scientific ideas. We examine whether the word "evolve," sometimes considered controversial by the general public, is frequently used in the popular press. Specifically, we ask how often articles discussing antibiotic resis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nina Singh, Matthew T Sit, Deanna M Chung, Ana A Lopez, Ranil Weerackoon, Pamela J Yeh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4775048?pdf=render
id doaj-e3a0cb8704d94e4cbe90fc4290bd57db
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e3a0cb8704d94e4cbe90fc4290bd57db2020-11-25T02:29:05ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01113e015039610.1371/journal.pone.0150396How Often Are Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Said to "Evolve" in the News?Nina SinghMatthew T SitDeanna M ChungAna A LopezRanil WeerackoonPamela J YehMedia plays an important role in informing the general public about scientific ideas. We examine whether the word "evolve," sometimes considered controversial by the general public, is frequently used in the popular press. Specifically, we ask how often articles discussing antibiotic resistance use the word "evolve" (or its lexemes) as opposed to alternative terms such as "emerge" or "develop." We chose the topic of antibiotic resistance because it is a medically important issue; bacterial evolution is a central player in human morbidity and mortality. We focused on the most widely-distributed newspapers written in English in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, India, and Australia. We examined all articles that focused primarily on the evolution of antibiotic resistance, were published in 2014 or earlier, and were accessible in online archives, for a total of 1639 articles. The total years examined per newspaper ranged from 5 to 37 years with a median of 27 years, and the overall range was 1978-2014. We quantified how many articles included the term "evolve" and analyzed how this varied with newspaper, country, and time. We found that an overall rate of 18% of articles used the term "evolve" but with significant variation among countries. Newspapers in the United Kingdom had the highest rate (24%), more than double of those in India (9%), the country with the lowest rate. These frequencies were lower than those found in scientific papers from both evolutionary journals and biomedical journals. There were no statistically significant changes in frequency and no trends when "evolve" usage was compared against variables such as newspaper circulation, liberal/conservative bias, time, and state evolution acceptance in U.S. newspapers. This study highlights the globally low usage of the word "evolve" in the popular press. We suggest this low usage may affect public understanding and acceptance of evolutionary concepts.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4775048?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nina Singh
Matthew T Sit
Deanna M Chung
Ana A Lopez
Ranil Weerackoon
Pamela J Yeh
spellingShingle Nina Singh
Matthew T Sit
Deanna M Chung
Ana A Lopez
Ranil Weerackoon
Pamela J Yeh
How Often Are Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Said to "Evolve" in the News?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Nina Singh
Matthew T Sit
Deanna M Chung
Ana A Lopez
Ranil Weerackoon
Pamela J Yeh
author_sort Nina Singh
title How Often Are Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Said to "Evolve" in the News?
title_short How Often Are Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Said to "Evolve" in the News?
title_full How Often Are Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Said to "Evolve" in the News?
title_fullStr How Often Are Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Said to "Evolve" in the News?
title_full_unstemmed How Often Are Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria Said to "Evolve" in the News?
title_sort how often are antibiotic-resistant bacteria said to "evolve" in the news?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Media plays an important role in informing the general public about scientific ideas. We examine whether the word "evolve," sometimes considered controversial by the general public, is frequently used in the popular press. Specifically, we ask how often articles discussing antibiotic resistance use the word "evolve" (or its lexemes) as opposed to alternative terms such as "emerge" or "develop." We chose the topic of antibiotic resistance because it is a medically important issue; bacterial evolution is a central player in human morbidity and mortality. We focused on the most widely-distributed newspapers written in English in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, India, and Australia. We examined all articles that focused primarily on the evolution of antibiotic resistance, were published in 2014 or earlier, and were accessible in online archives, for a total of 1639 articles. The total years examined per newspaper ranged from 5 to 37 years with a median of 27 years, and the overall range was 1978-2014. We quantified how many articles included the term "evolve" and analyzed how this varied with newspaper, country, and time. We found that an overall rate of 18% of articles used the term "evolve" but with significant variation among countries. Newspapers in the United Kingdom had the highest rate (24%), more than double of those in India (9%), the country with the lowest rate. These frequencies were lower than those found in scientific papers from both evolutionary journals and biomedical journals. There were no statistically significant changes in frequency and no trends when "evolve" usage was compared against variables such as newspaper circulation, liberal/conservative bias, time, and state evolution acceptance in U.S. newspapers. This study highlights the globally low usage of the word "evolve" in the popular press. We suggest this low usage may affect public understanding and acceptance of evolutionary concepts.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4775048?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT ninasingh howoftenareantibioticresistantbacteriasaidtoevolveinthenews
AT matthewtsit howoftenareantibioticresistantbacteriasaidtoevolveinthenews
AT deannamchung howoftenareantibioticresistantbacteriasaidtoevolveinthenews
AT anaalopez howoftenareantibioticresistantbacteriasaidtoevolveinthenews
AT ranilweerackoon howoftenareantibioticresistantbacteriasaidtoevolveinthenews
AT pamelajyeh howoftenareantibioticresistantbacteriasaidtoevolveinthenews
_version_ 1724834608943464448