Barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods study
Abstract Background Evidence indicates that suboptimal clinical handover from the intensive care unit (ICU) to general wards leads to unnecessary ICU readmissions and increased mortality. We aimed to gain insight into barriers and facilitators to implement and use ICU discharge practices. Methods A...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2017-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Health Services Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-017-2139-x |
id |
doaj-e3d1eea6604f432eaba311601fe594c3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e3d1eea6604f432eaba311601fe594c32020-11-25T01:53:23ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632017-04-0117111210.1186/s12913-017-2139-xBarriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods studyNelleke van Sluisveld0Anke Oerlemans1Gert Westert2Johannes Gerardus van der Hoeven3Hub Wollersheim4Marieke Zegers5Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ HealthcareRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ HealthcareRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ HealthcareDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical CenterRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ HealthcareRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ HealthcareAbstract Background Evidence indicates that suboptimal clinical handover from the intensive care unit (ICU) to general wards leads to unnecessary ICU readmissions and increased mortality. We aimed to gain insight into barriers and facilitators to implement and use ICU discharge practices. Methods A mixed methods approach was conducted, using 1) 23 individual and four focus group interviews, with post-ICU patients, ICU managers, and nurses and physicians working in the ICU or general ward of ten Dutch hospitals, and 2) a questionnaire survey, which contained 27 statements derived from the interviews, and was completed by 166 ICU physicians (21.8%) from 64 Dutch hospitals (71.1% of the total of 90 Dutch hospitals). Results The interviews resulted in 66 barriers and facilitators related to: the intervention (e.g., feasibility); the professional (e.g., attitude towards checklists); social factors (e.g., presence or absence of a culture of feedback); and the organisation (e.g., financial resources). A facilitator considered important by ICU physicians was a checklist to structure discharge communication (92.2%). Barriers deemed important were lack of a culture of feedback (55.4%), an absence of discharge criteria (23.5%), and an overestimation of the capabilities of general wards to care for complex patients by ICU physicians (74.7%). Conclusions Based on the barriers and facilitators found in this study, improving handover communication, formulating specific discharge criteria, stimulating a culture of feedback, and preventing overestimation of the general ward are important to effectively improve the ICU discharge process.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-017-2139-xIntensive careCritical careIntensive care unitPatient readmissionMortalityDischarge practices |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Nelleke van Sluisveld Anke Oerlemans Gert Westert Johannes Gerardus van der Hoeven Hub Wollersheim Marieke Zegers |
spellingShingle |
Nelleke van Sluisveld Anke Oerlemans Gert Westert Johannes Gerardus van der Hoeven Hub Wollersheim Marieke Zegers Barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods study BMC Health Services Research Intensive care Critical care Intensive care unit Patient readmission Mortality Discharge practices |
author_facet |
Nelleke van Sluisveld Anke Oerlemans Gert Westert Johannes Gerardus van der Hoeven Hub Wollersheim Marieke Zegers |
author_sort |
Nelleke van Sluisveld |
title |
Barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods study |
title_short |
Barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods study |
title_full |
Barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods study |
title_fullStr |
Barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods study |
title_sort |
barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the icu discharge process: a mixed methods study |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
BMC Health Services Research |
issn |
1472-6963 |
publishDate |
2017-04-01 |
description |
Abstract Background Evidence indicates that suboptimal clinical handover from the intensive care unit (ICU) to general wards leads to unnecessary ICU readmissions and increased mortality. We aimed to gain insight into barriers and facilitators to implement and use ICU discharge practices. Methods A mixed methods approach was conducted, using 1) 23 individual and four focus group interviews, with post-ICU patients, ICU managers, and nurses and physicians working in the ICU or general ward of ten Dutch hospitals, and 2) a questionnaire survey, which contained 27 statements derived from the interviews, and was completed by 166 ICU physicians (21.8%) from 64 Dutch hospitals (71.1% of the total of 90 Dutch hospitals). Results The interviews resulted in 66 barriers and facilitators related to: the intervention (e.g., feasibility); the professional (e.g., attitude towards checklists); social factors (e.g., presence or absence of a culture of feedback); and the organisation (e.g., financial resources). A facilitator considered important by ICU physicians was a checklist to structure discharge communication (92.2%). Barriers deemed important were lack of a culture of feedback (55.4%), an absence of discharge criteria (23.5%), and an overestimation of the capabilities of general wards to care for complex patients by ICU physicians (74.7%). Conclusions Based on the barriers and facilitators found in this study, improving handover communication, formulating specific discharge criteria, stimulating a culture of feedback, and preventing overestimation of the general ward are important to effectively improve the ICU discharge process. |
topic |
Intensive care Critical care Intensive care unit Patient readmission Mortality Discharge practices |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-017-2139-x |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT nellekevansluisveld barriersandfacilitatorstoimprovesafetyandefficiencyoftheicudischargeprocessamixedmethodsstudy AT ankeoerlemans barriersandfacilitatorstoimprovesafetyandefficiencyoftheicudischargeprocessamixedmethodsstudy AT gertwestert barriersandfacilitatorstoimprovesafetyandefficiencyoftheicudischargeprocessamixedmethodsstudy AT johannesgerardusvanderhoeven barriersandfacilitatorstoimprovesafetyandefficiencyoftheicudischargeprocessamixedmethodsstudy AT hubwollersheim barriersandfacilitatorstoimprovesafetyandefficiencyoftheicudischargeprocessamixedmethodsstudy AT mariekezegers barriersandfacilitatorstoimprovesafetyandefficiencyoftheicudischargeprocessamixedmethodsstudy |
_version_ |
1724991225506824192 |