Barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods study

Abstract Background Evidence indicates that suboptimal clinical handover from the intensive care unit (ICU) to general wards leads to unnecessary ICU readmissions and increased mortality. We aimed to gain insight into barriers and facilitators to implement and use ICU discharge practices. Methods A...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nelleke van Sluisveld, Anke Oerlemans, Gert Westert, Johannes Gerardus van der Hoeven, Hub Wollersheim, Marieke Zegers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-04-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-017-2139-x
id doaj-e3d1eea6604f432eaba311601fe594c3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e3d1eea6604f432eaba311601fe594c32020-11-25T01:53:23ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632017-04-0117111210.1186/s12913-017-2139-xBarriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods studyNelleke van Sluisveld0Anke Oerlemans1Gert Westert2Johannes Gerardus van der Hoeven3Hub Wollersheim4Marieke Zegers5Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ HealthcareRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ HealthcareRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ HealthcareDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Radboud University Medical CenterRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ HealthcareRadboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ HealthcareAbstract Background Evidence indicates that suboptimal clinical handover from the intensive care unit (ICU) to general wards leads to unnecessary ICU readmissions and increased mortality. We aimed to gain insight into barriers and facilitators to implement and use ICU discharge practices. Methods A mixed methods approach was conducted, using 1) 23 individual and four focus group interviews, with post-ICU patients, ICU managers, and nurses and physicians working in the ICU or general ward of ten Dutch hospitals, and 2) a questionnaire survey, which contained 27 statements derived from the interviews, and was completed by 166 ICU physicians (21.8%) from 64 Dutch hospitals (71.1% of the total of 90 Dutch hospitals). Results The interviews resulted in 66 barriers and facilitators related to: the intervention (e.g., feasibility); the professional (e.g., attitude towards checklists); social factors (e.g., presence or absence of a culture of feedback); and the organisation (e.g., financial resources). A facilitator considered important by ICU physicians was a checklist to structure discharge communication (92.2%). Barriers deemed important were lack of a culture of feedback (55.4%), an absence of discharge criteria (23.5%), and an overestimation of the capabilities of general wards to care for complex patients by ICU physicians (74.7%). Conclusions Based on the barriers and facilitators found in this study, improving handover communication, formulating specific discharge criteria, stimulating a culture of feedback, and preventing overestimation of the general ward are important to effectively improve the ICU discharge process.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-017-2139-xIntensive careCritical careIntensive care unitPatient readmissionMortalityDischarge practices
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nelleke van Sluisveld
Anke Oerlemans
Gert Westert
Johannes Gerardus van der Hoeven
Hub Wollersheim
Marieke Zegers
spellingShingle Nelleke van Sluisveld
Anke Oerlemans
Gert Westert
Johannes Gerardus van der Hoeven
Hub Wollersheim
Marieke Zegers
Barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods study
BMC Health Services Research
Intensive care
Critical care
Intensive care unit
Patient readmission
Mortality
Discharge practices
author_facet Nelleke van Sluisveld
Anke Oerlemans
Gert Westert
Johannes Gerardus van der Hoeven
Hub Wollersheim
Marieke Zegers
author_sort Nelleke van Sluisveld
title Barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods study
title_short Barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods study
title_full Barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the ICU discharge process: a mixed methods study
title_sort barriers and facilitators to improve safety and efficiency of the icu discharge process: a mixed methods study
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2017-04-01
description Abstract Background Evidence indicates that suboptimal clinical handover from the intensive care unit (ICU) to general wards leads to unnecessary ICU readmissions and increased mortality. We aimed to gain insight into barriers and facilitators to implement and use ICU discharge practices. Methods A mixed methods approach was conducted, using 1) 23 individual and four focus group interviews, with post-ICU patients, ICU managers, and nurses and physicians working in the ICU or general ward of ten Dutch hospitals, and 2) a questionnaire survey, which contained 27 statements derived from the interviews, and was completed by 166 ICU physicians (21.8%) from 64 Dutch hospitals (71.1% of the total of 90 Dutch hospitals). Results The interviews resulted in 66 barriers and facilitators related to: the intervention (e.g., feasibility); the professional (e.g., attitude towards checklists); social factors (e.g., presence or absence of a culture of feedback); and the organisation (e.g., financial resources). A facilitator considered important by ICU physicians was a checklist to structure discharge communication (92.2%). Barriers deemed important were lack of a culture of feedback (55.4%), an absence of discharge criteria (23.5%), and an overestimation of the capabilities of general wards to care for complex patients by ICU physicians (74.7%). Conclusions Based on the barriers and facilitators found in this study, improving handover communication, formulating specific discharge criteria, stimulating a culture of feedback, and preventing overestimation of the general ward are important to effectively improve the ICU discharge process.
topic Intensive care
Critical care
Intensive care unit
Patient readmission
Mortality
Discharge practices
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-017-2139-x
work_keys_str_mv AT nellekevansluisveld barriersandfacilitatorstoimprovesafetyandefficiencyoftheicudischargeprocessamixedmethodsstudy
AT ankeoerlemans barriersandfacilitatorstoimprovesafetyandefficiencyoftheicudischargeprocessamixedmethodsstudy
AT gertwestert barriersandfacilitatorstoimprovesafetyandefficiencyoftheicudischargeprocessamixedmethodsstudy
AT johannesgerardusvanderhoeven barriersandfacilitatorstoimprovesafetyandefficiencyoftheicudischargeprocessamixedmethodsstudy
AT hubwollersheim barriersandfacilitatorstoimprovesafetyandefficiencyoftheicudischargeprocessamixedmethodsstudy
AT mariekezegers barriersandfacilitatorstoimprovesafetyandefficiencyoftheicudischargeprocessamixedmethodsstudy
_version_ 1724991225506824192