Climate Sensitivity of GFDL's CM4.0

Abstract GFDL's new CM4.0 climate model has high transient and equilibrium climate sensitivities near the middle of the upper half of CMIP5 models. The CMIP5 models have been criticized for excessive sensitivity based on observations of present‐day warming and heat uptake and estimates of radia...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Winton, A. Adcroft, J. P. Dunne, I. M. Held, E. Shevliakova, M. Zhao, H. Guo, W. Hurlin, J. Krasting, T. Knutson, D. Paynter, L. G. Silvers, R. Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001838
id doaj-e3e5117ad2b9460c9f7f46ebc3f77f77
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e3e5117ad2b9460c9f7f46ebc3f77f772021-04-08T18:46:33ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems1942-24662020-01-01121n/an/a10.1029/2019MS001838Climate Sensitivity of GFDL's CM4.0M. Winton0A. Adcroft1J. P. Dunne2I. M. Held3E. Shevliakova4M. Zhao5H. Guo6W. Hurlin7J. Krasting8T. Knutson9D. Paynter10L. G. Silvers11R. Zhang12GFDL/NOAA Princeton NJ USAProgram in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Princeton University Princeton NJ USAGFDL/NOAA Princeton NJ USAProgram in Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Princeton University Princeton NJ USAGFDL/NOAA Princeton NJ USAGFDL/NOAA Princeton NJ USAGFDL/NOAA Princeton NJ USAGFDL/NOAA Princeton NJ USAGFDL/NOAA Princeton NJ USAGFDL/NOAA Princeton NJ USAGFDL/NOAA Princeton NJ USACooperative Institute for Modeling the Earth System Princeton University Princeton NJ USAGFDL/NOAA Princeton NJ USAAbstract GFDL's new CM4.0 climate model has high transient and equilibrium climate sensitivities near the middle of the upper half of CMIP5 models. The CMIP5 models have been criticized for excessive sensitivity based on observations of present‐day warming and heat uptake and estimates of radiative forcing. An ensemble of historical simulations with CM4.0 produces warming and heat uptake that are consistent with these observations under forcing that is at the middle of the assessed distribution. Energy budget‐based methods for estimating sensitivities based on these quantities underestimate CM4.0's sensitivities when applied to its historical simulations. However, we argue using a simple attribution procedure that CM4.0's warming evolution indicates excessive transient sensitivity to greenhouse gases. This excessive sensitivity is offset prior to recent decades by excessive response to aerosol and land use changes.https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001838
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. Winton
A. Adcroft
J. P. Dunne
I. M. Held
E. Shevliakova
M. Zhao
H. Guo
W. Hurlin
J. Krasting
T. Knutson
D. Paynter
L. G. Silvers
R. Zhang
spellingShingle M. Winton
A. Adcroft
J. P. Dunne
I. M. Held
E. Shevliakova
M. Zhao
H. Guo
W. Hurlin
J. Krasting
T. Knutson
D. Paynter
L. G. Silvers
R. Zhang
Climate Sensitivity of GFDL's CM4.0
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
author_facet M. Winton
A. Adcroft
J. P. Dunne
I. M. Held
E. Shevliakova
M. Zhao
H. Guo
W. Hurlin
J. Krasting
T. Knutson
D. Paynter
L. G. Silvers
R. Zhang
author_sort M. Winton
title Climate Sensitivity of GFDL's CM4.0
title_short Climate Sensitivity of GFDL's CM4.0
title_full Climate Sensitivity of GFDL's CM4.0
title_fullStr Climate Sensitivity of GFDL's CM4.0
title_full_unstemmed Climate Sensitivity of GFDL's CM4.0
title_sort climate sensitivity of gfdl's cm4.0
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
series Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
issn 1942-2466
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Abstract GFDL's new CM4.0 climate model has high transient and equilibrium climate sensitivities near the middle of the upper half of CMIP5 models. The CMIP5 models have been criticized for excessive sensitivity based on observations of present‐day warming and heat uptake and estimates of radiative forcing. An ensemble of historical simulations with CM4.0 produces warming and heat uptake that are consistent with these observations under forcing that is at the middle of the assessed distribution. Energy budget‐based methods for estimating sensitivities based on these quantities underestimate CM4.0's sensitivities when applied to its historical simulations. However, we argue using a simple attribution procedure that CM4.0's warming evolution indicates excessive transient sensitivity to greenhouse gases. This excessive sensitivity is offset prior to recent decades by excessive response to aerosol and land use changes.
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001838
work_keys_str_mv AT mwinton climatesensitivityofgfdlscm40
AT aadcroft climatesensitivityofgfdlscm40
AT jpdunne climatesensitivityofgfdlscm40
AT imheld climatesensitivityofgfdlscm40
AT eshevliakova climatesensitivityofgfdlscm40
AT mzhao climatesensitivityofgfdlscm40
AT hguo climatesensitivityofgfdlscm40
AT whurlin climatesensitivityofgfdlscm40
AT jkrasting climatesensitivityofgfdlscm40
AT tknutson climatesensitivityofgfdlscm40
AT dpaynter climatesensitivityofgfdlscm40
AT lgsilvers climatesensitivityofgfdlscm40
AT rzhang climatesensitivityofgfdlscm40
_version_ 1721533994765385728