Multiple treatment and indirect treatment comparisons: An overview of network meta-analysis
Randomized control trials and its meta-analysis has occupied the pinnacle in levels of evidence available for research. However, there were several limitations of these trials. Network meta-analysis (NMA) is a recent tool for evidence-based medicine that draws strength from direct and indirect evide...
Main Authors: | Nidhi Bhatnagar, P.V.M. Lakshmi, Kathiresan Jeyashree |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2014-01-01
|
Series: | Perspectives in Clinical Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.picronline.org/article.asp?issn=2229-3485;year=2014;volume=5;issue=4;spage=154;epage=158;aulast=Bhatnagar |
Similar Items
-
Matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison of ribociclib and palbociclib in HR+, HER2− advanced breast cancer
by: Tremblay G, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01) -
Simulation evaluation of statistical properties of methods for indirect and mixed treatment comparisons
by: Song Fujian, et al.
Published: (2012-09-01) -
A simulation study to compare different estimation approaches for network meta-analysis and corresponding methods to evaluate the consistency assumption
by: Corinna Kiefer, et al.
Published: (2020-02-01) -
Calcitonin Gene–Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibody Versus Botulinum Toxin for the Preventive Treatment of Chronic Migraine: Evidence From Indirect Treatment Comparison
by: Jiajie Lu, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01) -
Platinum-Based Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Indirect Treatment Comparison
by: Qin He, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)