Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters

Designing an economically viable catalyst that maintains high catalytic activity and stability is the key to unlock dry reforming of methane (DRM) as a primary strategy for biogas valorization. Ni/Al2O3 catalysts have been widely used for this purpose; however, several modifications have been report...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andrea Álvarez Moreno, Tomás Ramirez-Reina, Svetlana Ivanova, Anne-Cécile Roger, Miguel Ángel Centeno, José Antonio Odriozola
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Chemistry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2021.694976/full
id doaj-e44f9ed6fc3d4ec9aed394848cf2c86c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e44f9ed6fc3d4ec9aed394848cf2c86c2021-07-07T05:09:00ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Chemistry2296-26462021-07-01910.3389/fchem.2021.694976694976Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected PromotersAndrea Álvarez Moreno0Tomás Ramirez-Reina1Tomás Ramirez-Reina2Svetlana Ivanova3Anne-Cécile Roger4Miguel Ángel Centeno5José Antonio Odriozola6José Antonio Odriozola7Estado Sólido y Catálisis Ambiental, Departamento de Química, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Ciudad Universitaria, Bogotá, ColombiaCentro Mixto Universidad de Sevilla-CSIC, Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Sevilla, Sevilla, SpainDepartment of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, United KingdomCentro Mixto Universidad de Sevilla-CSIC, Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Sevilla, Sevilla, SpainICPEES, équipe Energie et Carburants pour un Environnement Durable, UMR CNRS, Strasbourg, FranceCentro Mixto Universidad de Sevilla-CSIC, Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Sevilla, Sevilla, SpainCentro Mixto Universidad de Sevilla-CSIC, Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Sevilla, Sevilla, SpainDepartment of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, United KingdomDesigning an economically viable catalyst that maintains high catalytic activity and stability is the key to unlock dry reforming of methane (DRM) as a primary strategy for biogas valorization. Ni/Al2O3 catalysts have been widely used for this purpose; however, several modifications have been reported in the last years in order to prevent coke deposition and deactivation of the samples. Modification of the acidity of the support and the addition of noble metal promoters are between the most reported strategies. Nevertheless, in the task of designing an active and stable catalyst for DRM, the selection of an appropriate noble metal promoter is turning more challenging owing to the lack of homogeneity of the different studies. Therefore, this research aims to compare Ru (0.50 and 2.0%) and Re (0.50 and 2.0%) as noble metal promoters for a Ni/MgAl2O4 catalyst under the same synthesis and reaction conditions. Catalysts were characterized by XRF, BET, XRD, TPR, hydrogen chemisorption (H2-TPD), and dry reforming reaction tests. Results show that both promoters increase Ni reducibility and dispersion. However, Ru seems a better promoter for DRM since 0.50% of Ru increases the catalytic activity in 10% and leads to less coke deposition.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2021.694976/fulldry reformingNi-based catalystrutheniumrheniumdeactivationcoke
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Andrea Álvarez Moreno
Tomás Ramirez-Reina
Tomás Ramirez-Reina
Svetlana Ivanova
Anne-Cécile Roger
Miguel Ángel Centeno
José Antonio Odriozola
José Antonio Odriozola
spellingShingle Andrea Álvarez Moreno
Tomás Ramirez-Reina
Tomás Ramirez-Reina
Svetlana Ivanova
Anne-Cécile Roger
Miguel Ángel Centeno
José Antonio Odriozola
José Antonio Odriozola
Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters
Frontiers in Chemistry
dry reforming
Ni-based catalyst
ruthenium
rhenium
deactivation
coke
author_facet Andrea Álvarez Moreno
Tomás Ramirez-Reina
Tomás Ramirez-Reina
Svetlana Ivanova
Anne-Cécile Roger
Miguel Ángel Centeno
José Antonio Odriozola
José Antonio Odriozola
author_sort Andrea Álvarez Moreno
title Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters
title_short Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters
title_full Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters
title_fullStr Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters
title_full_unstemmed Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters
title_sort bimetallic ni–ru and ni–re catalysts for dry reforming of methane: understanding the synergies of the selected promoters
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Chemistry
issn 2296-2646
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Designing an economically viable catalyst that maintains high catalytic activity and stability is the key to unlock dry reforming of methane (DRM) as a primary strategy for biogas valorization. Ni/Al2O3 catalysts have been widely used for this purpose; however, several modifications have been reported in the last years in order to prevent coke deposition and deactivation of the samples. Modification of the acidity of the support and the addition of noble metal promoters are between the most reported strategies. Nevertheless, in the task of designing an active and stable catalyst for DRM, the selection of an appropriate noble metal promoter is turning more challenging owing to the lack of homogeneity of the different studies. Therefore, this research aims to compare Ru (0.50 and 2.0%) and Re (0.50 and 2.0%) as noble metal promoters for a Ni/MgAl2O4 catalyst under the same synthesis and reaction conditions. Catalysts were characterized by XRF, BET, XRD, TPR, hydrogen chemisorption (H2-TPD), and dry reforming reaction tests. Results show that both promoters increase Ni reducibility and dispersion. However, Ru seems a better promoter for DRM since 0.50% of Ru increases the catalytic activity in 10% and leads to less coke deposition.
topic dry reforming
Ni-based catalyst
ruthenium
rhenium
deactivation
coke
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2021.694976/full
work_keys_str_mv AT andreaalvarezmoreno bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters
AT tomasramirezreina bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters
AT tomasramirezreina bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters
AT svetlanaivanova bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters
AT annececileroger bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters
AT miguelangelcenteno bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters
AT joseantonioodriozola bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters
AT joseantonioodriozola bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters
_version_ 1721316902464126976