Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters
Designing an economically viable catalyst that maintains high catalytic activity and stability is the key to unlock dry reforming of methane (DRM) as a primary strategy for biogas valorization. Ni/Al2O3 catalysts have been widely used for this purpose; however, several modifications have been report...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Chemistry |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2021.694976/full |
id |
doaj-e44f9ed6fc3d4ec9aed394848cf2c86c |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e44f9ed6fc3d4ec9aed394848cf2c86c2021-07-07T05:09:00ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Chemistry2296-26462021-07-01910.3389/fchem.2021.694976694976Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected PromotersAndrea Álvarez Moreno0Tomás Ramirez-Reina1Tomás Ramirez-Reina2Svetlana Ivanova3Anne-Cécile Roger4Miguel Ángel Centeno5José Antonio Odriozola6José Antonio Odriozola7Estado Sólido y Catálisis Ambiental, Departamento de Química, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Ciudad Universitaria, Bogotá, ColombiaCentro Mixto Universidad de Sevilla-CSIC, Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Sevilla, Sevilla, SpainDepartment of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, United KingdomCentro Mixto Universidad de Sevilla-CSIC, Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Sevilla, Sevilla, SpainICPEES, équipe Energie et Carburants pour un Environnement Durable, UMR CNRS, Strasbourg, FranceCentro Mixto Universidad de Sevilla-CSIC, Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Sevilla, Sevilla, SpainCentro Mixto Universidad de Sevilla-CSIC, Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Sevilla, Sevilla, SpainDepartment of Chemical and Process Engineering, University of Surrey, Guildford, United KingdomDesigning an economically viable catalyst that maintains high catalytic activity and stability is the key to unlock dry reforming of methane (DRM) as a primary strategy for biogas valorization. Ni/Al2O3 catalysts have been widely used for this purpose; however, several modifications have been reported in the last years in order to prevent coke deposition and deactivation of the samples. Modification of the acidity of the support and the addition of noble metal promoters are between the most reported strategies. Nevertheless, in the task of designing an active and stable catalyst for DRM, the selection of an appropriate noble metal promoter is turning more challenging owing to the lack of homogeneity of the different studies. Therefore, this research aims to compare Ru (0.50 and 2.0%) and Re (0.50 and 2.0%) as noble metal promoters for a Ni/MgAl2O4 catalyst under the same synthesis and reaction conditions. Catalysts were characterized by XRF, BET, XRD, TPR, hydrogen chemisorption (H2-TPD), and dry reforming reaction tests. Results show that both promoters increase Ni reducibility and dispersion. However, Ru seems a better promoter for DRM since 0.50% of Ru increases the catalytic activity in 10% and leads to less coke deposition.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2021.694976/fulldry reformingNi-based catalystrutheniumrheniumdeactivationcoke |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andrea Álvarez Moreno Tomás Ramirez-Reina Tomás Ramirez-Reina Svetlana Ivanova Anne-Cécile Roger Miguel Ángel Centeno José Antonio Odriozola José Antonio Odriozola |
spellingShingle |
Andrea Álvarez Moreno Tomás Ramirez-Reina Tomás Ramirez-Reina Svetlana Ivanova Anne-Cécile Roger Miguel Ángel Centeno José Antonio Odriozola José Antonio Odriozola Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters Frontiers in Chemistry dry reforming Ni-based catalyst ruthenium rhenium deactivation coke |
author_facet |
Andrea Álvarez Moreno Tomás Ramirez-Reina Tomás Ramirez-Reina Svetlana Ivanova Anne-Cécile Roger Miguel Ángel Centeno José Antonio Odriozola José Antonio Odriozola |
author_sort |
Andrea Álvarez Moreno |
title |
Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters |
title_short |
Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters |
title_full |
Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters |
title_fullStr |
Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters |
title_full_unstemmed |
Bimetallic Ni–Ru and Ni–Re Catalysts for Dry Reforming of Methane: Understanding the Synergies of the Selected Promoters |
title_sort |
bimetallic ni–ru and ni–re catalysts for dry reforming of methane: understanding the synergies of the selected promoters |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Chemistry |
issn |
2296-2646 |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
Designing an economically viable catalyst that maintains high catalytic activity and stability is the key to unlock dry reforming of methane (DRM) as a primary strategy for biogas valorization. Ni/Al2O3 catalysts have been widely used for this purpose; however, several modifications have been reported in the last years in order to prevent coke deposition and deactivation of the samples. Modification of the acidity of the support and the addition of noble metal promoters are between the most reported strategies. Nevertheless, in the task of designing an active and stable catalyst for DRM, the selection of an appropriate noble metal promoter is turning more challenging owing to the lack of homogeneity of the different studies. Therefore, this research aims to compare Ru (0.50 and 2.0%) and Re (0.50 and 2.0%) as noble metal promoters for a Ni/MgAl2O4 catalyst under the same synthesis and reaction conditions. Catalysts were characterized by XRF, BET, XRD, TPR, hydrogen chemisorption (H2-TPD), and dry reforming reaction tests. Results show that both promoters increase Ni reducibility and dispersion. However, Ru seems a better promoter for DRM since 0.50% of Ru increases the catalytic activity in 10% and leads to less coke deposition. |
topic |
dry reforming Ni-based catalyst ruthenium rhenium deactivation coke |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fchem.2021.694976/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andreaalvarezmoreno bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters AT tomasramirezreina bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters AT tomasramirezreina bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters AT svetlanaivanova bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters AT annececileroger bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters AT miguelangelcenteno bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters AT joseantonioodriozola bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters AT joseantonioodriozola bimetallicniruandnirecatalystsfordryreformingofmethaneunderstandingthesynergiesoftheselectedpromoters |
_version_ |
1721316902464126976 |