Surface analysis of titanium dental implants with different topographies

Cylindrical dental implants made of commercially pure titanium were analysed in four different surface finishes: as-machined, Al2O3 blasted with Al2O3 particles, plasma-sprayed with titanium beads and electrolytically coated with hydroxyapatite. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with Energy Dispers...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M.H. Prado da Silva, G.A. Soares, C.N. Elias, J.H.C. Lima, H. Schechtman, I.R. Gibson, S.M. Best
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Brasileira de Metalurgia e Materiais (ABM); Associação Brasileira de Cerâmica (ABC); Associação Brasileira de Polímeros (ABPol) 2000-07-01
Series:Materials Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392000000300003
id doaj-e45262d9e447406eb7216d5edbab34c9
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e45262d9e447406eb7216d5edbab34c92020-11-25T00:57:54ZengAssociação Brasileira de Metalurgia e Materiais (ABM); Associação Brasileira de Cerâmica (ABC); Associação Brasileira de Polímeros (ABPol)Materials Research1516-14392000-07-0133616710.1590/S1516-14392000000300003Surface analysis of titanium dental implants with different topographiesM.H. Prado da SilvaG.A. SoaresC.N. EliasJ.H.C. LimaH. SchechtmanI.R. GibsonS.M. BestCylindrical dental implants made of commercially pure titanium were analysed in four different surface finishes: as-machined, Al2O3 blasted with Al2O3 particles, plasma-sprayed with titanium beads and electrolytically coated with hydroxyapatite. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with Energy Dispersive X-ray Analysis (EDX) revealed the topography of the surfaces and provided qualitative results of the chemical composition of the different implants. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) was used to perform chemical analysis on the surface of the implants while Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy (LSM) produced topographic maps of the analysed surfaces. Optical Profilometry was used to quantitatively characterise the level of roughness of the surfaces. The implant that was plasma-sprayed and the hydroxyapatite coated implant showed the roughest surface, followed by the implant blasted with alumina and the as-machined implant. Some remnant contamination from the processes of blasting, coating and cleaning was detected by XPS.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392000000300003titaniumdental implantssurface characterisation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M.H. Prado da Silva
G.A. Soares
C.N. Elias
J.H.C. Lima
H. Schechtman
I.R. Gibson
S.M. Best
spellingShingle M.H. Prado da Silva
G.A. Soares
C.N. Elias
J.H.C. Lima
H. Schechtman
I.R. Gibson
S.M. Best
Surface analysis of titanium dental implants with different topographies
Materials Research
titanium
dental implants
surface characterisation
author_facet M.H. Prado da Silva
G.A. Soares
C.N. Elias
J.H.C. Lima
H. Schechtman
I.R. Gibson
S.M. Best
author_sort M.H. Prado da Silva
title Surface analysis of titanium dental implants with different topographies
title_short Surface analysis of titanium dental implants with different topographies
title_full Surface analysis of titanium dental implants with different topographies
title_fullStr Surface analysis of titanium dental implants with different topographies
title_full_unstemmed Surface analysis of titanium dental implants with different topographies
title_sort surface analysis of titanium dental implants with different topographies
publisher Associação Brasileira de Metalurgia e Materiais (ABM); Associação Brasileira de Cerâmica (ABC); Associação Brasileira de Polímeros (ABPol)
series Materials Research
issn 1516-1439
publishDate 2000-07-01
description Cylindrical dental implants made of commercially pure titanium were analysed in four different surface finishes: as-machined, Al2O3 blasted with Al2O3 particles, plasma-sprayed with titanium beads and electrolytically coated with hydroxyapatite. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) with Energy Dispersive X-ray Analysis (EDX) revealed the topography of the surfaces and provided qualitative results of the chemical composition of the different implants. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS) was used to perform chemical analysis on the surface of the implants while Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy (LSM) produced topographic maps of the analysed surfaces. Optical Profilometry was used to quantitatively characterise the level of roughness of the surfaces. The implant that was plasma-sprayed and the hydroxyapatite coated implant showed the roughest surface, followed by the implant blasted with alumina and the as-machined implant. Some remnant contamination from the processes of blasting, coating and cleaning was detected by XPS.
topic titanium
dental implants
surface characterisation
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-14392000000300003
work_keys_str_mv AT mhpradodasilva surfaceanalysisoftitaniumdentalimplantswithdifferenttopographies
AT gasoares surfaceanalysisoftitaniumdentalimplantswithdifferenttopographies
AT cnelias surfaceanalysisoftitaniumdentalimplantswithdifferenttopographies
AT jhclima surfaceanalysisoftitaniumdentalimplantswithdifferenttopographies
AT hschechtman surfaceanalysisoftitaniumdentalimplantswithdifferenttopographies
AT irgibson surfaceanalysisoftitaniumdentalimplantswithdifferenttopographies
AT smbest surfaceanalysisoftitaniumdentalimplantswithdifferenttopographies
_version_ 1725222306423242752