Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging versus FDG-PET/CT for initial lymphoma staging: systematic review on diagnostic test accuracy studies

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Positron emission tomography with [18]F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG-PET/CT) has been advocated as the method of choice for lymphoma staging, since it enables whole-body analysis with high sensitivity for detection of affected areas and because it combines capacities for anatomi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rodrigo Regacini, Andrea Puchnick, David Carlos Shigueoka, Wagner Iared, Henrique Manoel Lederman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associação Paulista de Medicina
Series:São Paulo Medical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802015000200141&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-e46e76477bef4bb99a6e43439088e5d0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e46e76477bef4bb99a6e43439088e5d02020-11-25T00:52:30ZengAssociação Paulista de MedicinaSão Paulo Medical Journal1806-9460133214115010.1590/1516-3180.2014.8312810S1516-31802015000200141Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging versus FDG-PET/CT for initial lymphoma staging: systematic review on diagnostic test accuracy studiesRodrigo RegaciniAndrea PuchnickDavid Carlos ShigueokaWagner IaredHenrique Manoel LedermanCONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Positron emission tomography with [18]F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG-PET/CT) has been advocated as the method of choice for lymphoma staging, since it enables whole-body analysis with high sensitivity for detection of affected areas and because it combines capacities for anatomical and functional assessment. With technological advances, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as an alternative to FDG-PET/CT. This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to compare whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI (WB-MRI) with FDG-PET/CT for lymphoma staging. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review on diagnostic test accuracy studies conducted at a public university. METHODS: The Medline, Scopus, Embase and Lilacs databases were searched for studies published up to September 2013 that compared WB-MRI and FDG-PET/CT for lymphoma staging. The reference lists of included studies were checked for any relevant additional citations. RESULTS: Six studies that evaluated the initial lymphoma staging in 116 patients were included. WB-MRI and FDG-PET/CT agreed in 90.5% of the cases (κ = 0.871; P < 0.0001). In most of the studies, when there was disagreement between the methods, WB-MRI overstaged in relation to FDG-PET/CT. The sensitivity of WB-MRI and FDG-PET/CT, in comparison with the clinical-radiological standard, ranged from 59 to 100% and from 63 to 100% respectively. CONCLUSION: WB-MRI is a highly sensitive method for initial lymphoma staging. It has excellent agreement with FDG-PET/CT and is a great alternative for managing lymphoma patients, without using ionizing radiation or an intravenous contrast agent.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802015000200141&lng=en&tlng=enMagnetic resonance imagingDiffusion magnetic resonance imagingWhole body imagingLymphomaPositron-emission tomography
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rodrigo Regacini
Andrea Puchnick
David Carlos Shigueoka
Wagner Iared
Henrique Manoel Lederman
spellingShingle Rodrigo Regacini
Andrea Puchnick
David Carlos Shigueoka
Wagner Iared
Henrique Manoel Lederman
Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging versus FDG-PET/CT for initial lymphoma staging: systematic review on diagnostic test accuracy studies
São Paulo Medical Journal
Magnetic resonance imaging
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging
Whole body imaging
Lymphoma
Positron-emission tomography
author_facet Rodrigo Regacini
Andrea Puchnick
David Carlos Shigueoka
Wagner Iared
Henrique Manoel Lederman
author_sort Rodrigo Regacini
title Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging versus FDG-PET/CT for initial lymphoma staging: systematic review on diagnostic test accuracy studies
title_short Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging versus FDG-PET/CT for initial lymphoma staging: systematic review on diagnostic test accuracy studies
title_full Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging versus FDG-PET/CT for initial lymphoma staging: systematic review on diagnostic test accuracy studies
title_fullStr Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging versus FDG-PET/CT for initial lymphoma staging: systematic review on diagnostic test accuracy studies
title_full_unstemmed Whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging versus FDG-PET/CT for initial lymphoma staging: systematic review on diagnostic test accuracy studies
title_sort whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging versus fdg-pet/ct for initial lymphoma staging: systematic review on diagnostic test accuracy studies
publisher Associação Paulista de Medicina
series São Paulo Medical Journal
issn 1806-9460
description CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE: Positron emission tomography with [18]F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (FDG-PET/CT) has been advocated as the method of choice for lymphoma staging, since it enables whole-body analysis with high sensitivity for detection of affected areas and because it combines capacities for anatomical and functional assessment. With technological advances, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has emerged as an alternative to FDG-PET/CT. This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to compare whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI (WB-MRI) with FDG-PET/CT for lymphoma staging. DESIGN AND SETTING: Systematic review on diagnostic test accuracy studies conducted at a public university. METHODS: The Medline, Scopus, Embase and Lilacs databases were searched for studies published up to September 2013 that compared WB-MRI and FDG-PET/CT for lymphoma staging. The reference lists of included studies were checked for any relevant additional citations. RESULTS: Six studies that evaluated the initial lymphoma staging in 116 patients were included. WB-MRI and FDG-PET/CT agreed in 90.5% of the cases (κ = 0.871; P < 0.0001). In most of the studies, when there was disagreement between the methods, WB-MRI overstaged in relation to FDG-PET/CT. The sensitivity of WB-MRI and FDG-PET/CT, in comparison with the clinical-radiological standard, ranged from 59 to 100% and from 63 to 100% respectively. CONCLUSION: WB-MRI is a highly sensitive method for initial lymphoma staging. It has excellent agreement with FDG-PET/CT and is a great alternative for managing lymphoma patients, without using ionizing radiation or an intravenous contrast agent.
topic Magnetic resonance imaging
Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging
Whole body imaging
Lymphoma
Positron-emission tomography
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1516-31802015000200141&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT rodrigoregacini wholebodydiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingversusfdgpetctforinitiallymphomastagingsystematicreviewondiagnostictestaccuracystudies
AT andreapuchnick wholebodydiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingversusfdgpetctforinitiallymphomastagingsystematicreviewondiagnostictestaccuracystudies
AT davidcarlosshigueoka wholebodydiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingversusfdgpetctforinitiallymphomastagingsystematicreviewondiagnostictestaccuracystudies
AT wagneriared wholebodydiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingversusfdgpetctforinitiallymphomastagingsystematicreviewondiagnostictestaccuracystudies
AT henriquemanoellederman wholebodydiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingversusfdgpetctforinitiallymphomastagingsystematicreviewondiagnostictestaccuracystudies
_version_ 1725242141569974272