Widespread cryptic variation in genetic architecture between the sexes

Abstract The majority of the genome is shared between the sexes, and it is expected that the genetic architecture of most traits is shared as well. This common architecture has been viewed as a major source of constraint on the evolution of sexual dimorphism (SD). SD is nonetheless common in nature,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Wouter van derBijl, Judith E. Mank
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-08-01
Series:Evolution Letters
Subjects:
rFM
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.245
id doaj-e4b3d93249564d3e993770909a778b46
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e4b3d93249564d3e993770909a778b462021-08-02T14:22:29ZengWileyEvolution Letters2056-37442021-08-015435936910.1002/evl3.245Widespread cryptic variation in genetic architecture between the sexesWouter van derBijl0Judith E. Mank1Department of Zoology University of British Columbia Vancouver BC V6T 1Z4 CanadaDepartment of Zoology University of British Columbia Vancouver BC V6T 1Z4 CanadaAbstract The majority of the genome is shared between the sexes, and it is expected that the genetic architecture of most traits is shared as well. This common architecture has been viewed as a major source of constraint on the evolution of sexual dimorphism (SD). SD is nonetheless common in nature, leading to assumptions that it results from differential regulation of shared genetic architecture. Here, we study the effect of thousands of gene knockout mutations on 202 mouse phenotypes to explore how regulatory variation affects SD. We show that many traits are dimorphic to some extent, and that a surprising proportion of knockouts have sex‐specific phenotypic effects. Many traits, regardless whether they are monomorphic or dimorphic, harbor cryptic differences in genetic architecture between the sexes, resulting in sexually discordant phenotypic effects from sexually concordant regulatory changes. This provides an alternative route to dimorphism through sex‐specific genetic architecture, rather than differential regulation of shared architecture.https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.245Between‐sex genetic correlationgenetic architectureknockoutrFMsexual dimorphism
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Wouter van derBijl
Judith E. Mank
spellingShingle Wouter van derBijl
Judith E. Mank
Widespread cryptic variation in genetic architecture between the sexes
Evolution Letters
Between‐sex genetic correlation
genetic architecture
knockout
rFM
sexual dimorphism
author_facet Wouter van derBijl
Judith E. Mank
author_sort Wouter van derBijl
title Widespread cryptic variation in genetic architecture between the sexes
title_short Widespread cryptic variation in genetic architecture between the sexes
title_full Widespread cryptic variation in genetic architecture between the sexes
title_fullStr Widespread cryptic variation in genetic architecture between the sexes
title_full_unstemmed Widespread cryptic variation in genetic architecture between the sexes
title_sort widespread cryptic variation in genetic architecture between the sexes
publisher Wiley
series Evolution Letters
issn 2056-3744
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Abstract The majority of the genome is shared between the sexes, and it is expected that the genetic architecture of most traits is shared as well. This common architecture has been viewed as a major source of constraint on the evolution of sexual dimorphism (SD). SD is nonetheless common in nature, leading to assumptions that it results from differential regulation of shared genetic architecture. Here, we study the effect of thousands of gene knockout mutations on 202 mouse phenotypes to explore how regulatory variation affects SD. We show that many traits are dimorphic to some extent, and that a surprising proportion of knockouts have sex‐specific phenotypic effects. Many traits, regardless whether they are monomorphic or dimorphic, harbor cryptic differences in genetic architecture between the sexes, resulting in sexually discordant phenotypic effects from sexually concordant regulatory changes. This provides an alternative route to dimorphism through sex‐specific genetic architecture, rather than differential regulation of shared architecture.
topic Between‐sex genetic correlation
genetic architecture
knockout
rFM
sexual dimorphism
url https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.245
work_keys_str_mv AT woutervanderbijl widespreadcrypticvariationingeneticarchitecturebetweenthesexes
AT judithemank widespreadcrypticvariationingeneticarchitecturebetweenthesexes
_version_ 1721231274792714240