Modern Surfboards and Their Structural Characterization: Towards an Engineering Approach

Recently, manufactures who produce surfboards using computer aided design and robotic (CNC) shaping tools have gained a larger share of the surfing market, allowing board producers and shapers to produce lighter and more durable boards. The improvement in design and production process of surfboards...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luca Oggiano, Marc in het Panhuis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-06-01
Series:Proceedings
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/49/1/65
id doaj-e4d9408833c14de999b6c87b9a29cff3
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e4d9408833c14de999b6c87b9a29cff32020-11-25T03:24:56ZengMDPI AGProceedings2504-39002020-06-0149656510.3390/proceedings2020049065Modern Surfboards and Their Structural Characterization: Towards an Engineering ApproachLuca Oggiano0Marc in het Panhuis1SIAT Senter for idrettsanlegg og teknolgi, NTNU, 7432 Trondheim, NorwaySurf Flex Lab, Australian Institute for Innovative Materials, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, AustraliaRecently, manufactures who produce surfboards using computer aided design and robotic (CNC) shaping tools have gained a larger share of the surfing market, allowing board producers and shapers to produce lighter and more durable boards. The improvement in design and production process of surfboards has been directly linked with the adaption of technologies tested and validated in other industries. However, the surfing industry still lacks methodologies, standards and testing facilities to scientifically investigate and quantify the structural and hydrodynamic properties of surfboards. It is widely accepted that distributed rigidity, damping and stiffness in the three directions play a huge role in defining surfboard performance. These properties are rarely stated by producers and never measured. The present paper compares two boards with equal outline and geometric shape but built with two different technologies: one board built with a traditional high density polyurethane (PU) blank, polyester resin and a stringer to improve longitudinal stiffness and one board built with bio epoxy resin, expanded polystyrene (EPS) and two side inserts made of cork to improve longitudinal stiffness and damping. Different tests were carried out to compare the two boards and a testing methodology with the aim to evaluate board structural properties and identify key parameters that will influence the board performances. Accelerometers were used to characterize stiffness and damping while a custom-made flex machine was used to evaluate the torsional stiffness. Differences between the two boards are highlighted, leading to the fact that the two boards, even being identical in size, will behave differently in different wave conditions and for different surfers.https://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/49/1/65surfingtestingperformancesstructural dynamic
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Luca Oggiano
Marc in het Panhuis
spellingShingle Luca Oggiano
Marc in het Panhuis
Modern Surfboards and Their Structural Characterization: Towards an Engineering Approach
Proceedings
surfing
testing
performances
structural dynamic
author_facet Luca Oggiano
Marc in het Panhuis
author_sort Luca Oggiano
title Modern Surfboards and Their Structural Characterization: Towards an Engineering Approach
title_short Modern Surfboards and Their Structural Characterization: Towards an Engineering Approach
title_full Modern Surfboards and Their Structural Characterization: Towards an Engineering Approach
title_fullStr Modern Surfboards and Their Structural Characterization: Towards an Engineering Approach
title_full_unstemmed Modern Surfboards and Their Structural Characterization: Towards an Engineering Approach
title_sort modern surfboards and their structural characterization: towards an engineering approach
publisher MDPI AG
series Proceedings
issn 2504-3900
publishDate 2020-06-01
description Recently, manufactures who produce surfboards using computer aided design and robotic (CNC) shaping tools have gained a larger share of the surfing market, allowing board producers and shapers to produce lighter and more durable boards. The improvement in design and production process of surfboards has been directly linked with the adaption of technologies tested and validated in other industries. However, the surfing industry still lacks methodologies, standards and testing facilities to scientifically investigate and quantify the structural and hydrodynamic properties of surfboards. It is widely accepted that distributed rigidity, damping and stiffness in the three directions play a huge role in defining surfboard performance. These properties are rarely stated by producers and never measured. The present paper compares two boards with equal outline and geometric shape but built with two different technologies: one board built with a traditional high density polyurethane (PU) blank, polyester resin and a stringer to improve longitudinal stiffness and one board built with bio epoxy resin, expanded polystyrene (EPS) and two side inserts made of cork to improve longitudinal stiffness and damping. Different tests were carried out to compare the two boards and a testing methodology with the aim to evaluate board structural properties and identify key parameters that will influence the board performances. Accelerometers were used to characterize stiffness and damping while a custom-made flex machine was used to evaluate the torsional stiffness. Differences between the two boards are highlighted, leading to the fact that the two boards, even being identical in size, will behave differently in different wave conditions and for different surfers.
topic surfing
testing
performances
structural dynamic
url https://www.mdpi.com/2504-3900/49/1/65
work_keys_str_mv AT lucaoggiano modernsurfboardsandtheirstructuralcharacterizationtowardsanengineeringapproach
AT marcinhetpanhuis modernsurfboardsandtheirstructuralcharacterizationtowardsanengineeringapproach
_version_ 1724598952463958016