A comparative investigation of the cleaning efficacy of different manual and mechanical endodontic instruments (SEM study)

The purpose of this SEM study was to evaluate the cleaning effects of different manual and mechanical endodontic instruments. Sixty single canal human teeth were selected for this study. The root canals were instrumented by seven types of manual endodontic instruments (K-enlargers, K files Rattail f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dačić Dragoslav, Živković Slavoljub
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Serbian Medical Society - Dental Section, Belgrade 2003-01-01
Series:Stomatološki glasnik Srbije
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0039-1743/2003/0039-17430303137D.pdf
id doaj-e52a31f0656440799c1127fe4e425942
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e52a31f0656440799c1127fe4e4259422020-11-25T00:29:57ZengSerbian Medical Society - Dental Section, BelgradeStomatološki glasnik Srbije0039-17432003-01-0150313714310.2298/SGS0303137DA comparative investigation of the cleaning efficacy of different manual and mechanical endodontic instruments (SEM study)Dačić DragoslavŽivković SlavoljubThe purpose of this SEM study was to evaluate the cleaning effects of different manual and mechanical endodontic instruments. Sixty single canal human teeth were selected for this study. The root canals were instrumented by seven types of manual endodontic instruments (K-enlargers, K files Rattail files, K-Flexofiles, K Flex files, Hedstrom and NiTi Flex files) and five different mechanical endodontic instruments (Rispi, Rat tail Hedstrom, NiTi Flex files and K-enlargers). During and after the instrumentation, the canals were irrigated by 2.5% sodium hypochlorit. After splitting the roots longitudinally, the amount of debris and smear layer was quantified on the basis of a numerical evaluation scale, using scanning electron microscope. Results were statistically analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and t-test. There were no statistically significant differences between hand instrumentation and machine instrumentation with different endodontic instruments for any of the variables tested. Best instrumentation results in removing the smear layer and dentinal debris from the root canal were obtained with Kerr, NiTi and Hedstrom hand files and with K-enlargers, NiTi and Rat-tail mechanical files. In the apical thirds of root canals prepared using hand and mechanical endodontic instruments the smear layer and dentinal debris were always more abundant when compared with the middle and coronal thirds. In conslusion, cleaning efficacy differed slightly among the techniques and instruments, none of them completely removed smear layer and all left some debris. http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0039-1743/2003/0039-17430303137D.pdfcanal debridementendodontic instrumentsscanning electron microscopy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dačić Dragoslav
Živković Slavoljub
spellingShingle Dačić Dragoslav
Živković Slavoljub
A comparative investigation of the cleaning efficacy of different manual and mechanical endodontic instruments (SEM study)
Stomatološki glasnik Srbije
canal debridement
endodontic instruments
scanning electron microscopy
author_facet Dačić Dragoslav
Živković Slavoljub
author_sort Dačić Dragoslav
title A comparative investigation of the cleaning efficacy of different manual and mechanical endodontic instruments (SEM study)
title_short A comparative investigation of the cleaning efficacy of different manual and mechanical endodontic instruments (SEM study)
title_full A comparative investigation of the cleaning efficacy of different manual and mechanical endodontic instruments (SEM study)
title_fullStr A comparative investigation of the cleaning efficacy of different manual and mechanical endodontic instruments (SEM study)
title_full_unstemmed A comparative investigation of the cleaning efficacy of different manual and mechanical endodontic instruments (SEM study)
title_sort comparative investigation of the cleaning efficacy of different manual and mechanical endodontic instruments (sem study)
publisher Serbian Medical Society - Dental Section, Belgrade
series Stomatološki glasnik Srbije
issn 0039-1743
publishDate 2003-01-01
description The purpose of this SEM study was to evaluate the cleaning effects of different manual and mechanical endodontic instruments. Sixty single canal human teeth were selected for this study. The root canals were instrumented by seven types of manual endodontic instruments (K-enlargers, K files Rattail files, K-Flexofiles, K Flex files, Hedstrom and NiTi Flex files) and five different mechanical endodontic instruments (Rispi, Rat tail Hedstrom, NiTi Flex files and K-enlargers). During and after the instrumentation, the canals were irrigated by 2.5% sodium hypochlorit. After splitting the roots longitudinally, the amount of debris and smear layer was quantified on the basis of a numerical evaluation scale, using scanning electron microscope. Results were statistically analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test and t-test. There were no statistically significant differences between hand instrumentation and machine instrumentation with different endodontic instruments for any of the variables tested. Best instrumentation results in removing the smear layer and dentinal debris from the root canal were obtained with Kerr, NiTi and Hedstrom hand files and with K-enlargers, NiTi and Rat-tail mechanical files. In the apical thirds of root canals prepared using hand and mechanical endodontic instruments the smear layer and dentinal debris were always more abundant when compared with the middle and coronal thirds. In conslusion, cleaning efficacy differed slightly among the techniques and instruments, none of them completely removed smear layer and all left some debris.
topic canal debridement
endodontic instruments
scanning electron microscopy
url http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0039-1743/2003/0039-17430303137D.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dacicdragoslav acomparativeinvestigationofthecleaningefficacyofdifferentmanualandmechanicalendodonticinstrumentssemstudy
AT zivkovicslavoljub acomparativeinvestigationofthecleaningefficacyofdifferentmanualandmechanicalendodonticinstrumentssemstudy
AT dacicdragoslav comparativeinvestigationofthecleaningefficacyofdifferentmanualandmechanicalendodonticinstrumentssemstudy
AT zivkovicslavoljub comparativeinvestigationofthecleaningefficacyofdifferentmanualandmechanicalendodonticinstrumentssemstudy
_version_ 1725328840207630336