Joint Pricing and Product Carbon Footprint Decisions and Coordination of Supply Chain with Cap-and-Trade Regulation

The implementation of cap-and-trade regulation worldwide is bound to have some effects on supply chain decision-making. This paper investigates optimal pricing and product carbon footprint decisions of the supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer under cap-and-trade regulation by app...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yonghong Cheng, Zhongkai Xiong, Qinglin Luo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2018-02-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/2/481
id doaj-e52d94fd10b149fd879684559697709f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e52d94fd10b149fd879684559697709f2020-11-24T22:33:49ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502018-02-0110248110.3390/su10020481su10020481Joint Pricing and Product Carbon Footprint Decisions and Coordination of Supply Chain with Cap-and-Trade RegulationYonghong Cheng0Zhongkai Xiong1Qinglin Luo2School of Management Engineering, Anhui Polytechnic University, Wuhu 241000, ChinaSchool of Economics and Business Administration, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, ChinaAntai College of Economics and Management, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200052, ChinaThe implementation of cap-and-trade regulation worldwide is bound to have some effects on supply chain decision-making. This paper investigates optimal pricing and product carbon footprint decisions of the supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer under cap-and-trade regulation by applying optimization and game theory. By comparing the optimal results between the centralized and decentralized decision-making models, we find that the optimal product carbon footprint and selling price not only depend on the carbon trading price and carbon cap allocated by the government, but also relate to the initial carbon footprint of the product and the decision-making methods in the supply chain. It is found that there is also a “double marginalization” in the decentralized situation, thus we coordinate the supply chain using a two-part tariff contract. Specifically, only the manufacturer adjusts dynamically the wholesale price and fixed fee within the coordinating contract according to different initial carbon footprint and the range of the carbon cap reduction by the government. Finally, we obtain several interesting conclusions from the numerical examples and provide managerial insights and policy implications from the analytical results.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/2/481cap-and-trade regulationpricingproduct carbon footprinttwo-part tariffs contract
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Yonghong Cheng
Zhongkai Xiong
Qinglin Luo
spellingShingle Yonghong Cheng
Zhongkai Xiong
Qinglin Luo
Joint Pricing and Product Carbon Footprint Decisions and Coordination of Supply Chain with Cap-and-Trade Regulation
Sustainability
cap-and-trade regulation
pricing
product carbon footprint
two-part tariffs contract
author_facet Yonghong Cheng
Zhongkai Xiong
Qinglin Luo
author_sort Yonghong Cheng
title Joint Pricing and Product Carbon Footprint Decisions and Coordination of Supply Chain with Cap-and-Trade Regulation
title_short Joint Pricing and Product Carbon Footprint Decisions and Coordination of Supply Chain with Cap-and-Trade Regulation
title_full Joint Pricing and Product Carbon Footprint Decisions and Coordination of Supply Chain with Cap-and-Trade Regulation
title_fullStr Joint Pricing and Product Carbon Footprint Decisions and Coordination of Supply Chain with Cap-and-Trade Regulation
title_full_unstemmed Joint Pricing and Product Carbon Footprint Decisions and Coordination of Supply Chain with Cap-and-Trade Regulation
title_sort joint pricing and product carbon footprint decisions and coordination of supply chain with cap-and-trade regulation
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2018-02-01
description The implementation of cap-and-trade regulation worldwide is bound to have some effects on supply chain decision-making. This paper investigates optimal pricing and product carbon footprint decisions of the supply chain consisting of a manufacturer and a retailer under cap-and-trade regulation by applying optimization and game theory. By comparing the optimal results between the centralized and decentralized decision-making models, we find that the optimal product carbon footprint and selling price not only depend on the carbon trading price and carbon cap allocated by the government, but also relate to the initial carbon footprint of the product and the decision-making methods in the supply chain. It is found that there is also a “double marginalization” in the decentralized situation, thus we coordinate the supply chain using a two-part tariff contract. Specifically, only the manufacturer adjusts dynamically the wholesale price and fixed fee within the coordinating contract according to different initial carbon footprint and the range of the carbon cap reduction by the government. Finally, we obtain several interesting conclusions from the numerical examples and provide managerial insights and policy implications from the analytical results.
topic cap-and-trade regulation
pricing
product carbon footprint
two-part tariffs contract
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/10/2/481
work_keys_str_mv AT yonghongcheng jointpricingandproductcarbonfootprintdecisionsandcoordinationofsupplychainwithcapandtraderegulation
AT zhongkaixiong jointpricingandproductcarbonfootprintdecisionsandcoordinationofsupplychainwithcapandtraderegulation
AT qinglinluo jointpricingandproductcarbonfootprintdecisionsandcoordinationofsupplychainwithcapandtraderegulation
_version_ 1725729186693251072