Addressing identification bias in the design and analysis of cluster-randomized pragmatic trials: a case study
Abstract Background Pragmatic trials provide the opportunity to study the effectiveness of health interventions to improve care in real-world settings. However, use of open-cohort designs with patients becoming eligible after randomization and reliance on electronic health records (EHRs) to identify...
Main Authors: | Jennifer F. Bobb, Hongxiang Qiu, Abigail G. Matthews, Jennifer McCormack, Katharine A. Bradley |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Trials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-020-4148-z |
Similar Items
-
Selection bias and subject refusal in a cluster-randomized controlled trial
by: Rochelle Yang, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01) -
Assessment of risk of bias in quasi-randomized controlled trials and randomized controlled trials reported in the between 2010 and 2016
by: Jong Hae Kim, et al.
Published: (2017-10-01) -
Randomization in randomized clinical trials: From theory to practice
by: Mina Mohammady, et al.
Published: (2016-07-01) -
Mechanisms and direction of allocation bias in randomised clinical trials
by: Asger Paludan-Müller, et al.
Published: (2016-10-01) -
randomizeR: An R Package for the Assessment and Implementation of Randomization in Clinical Trials
by: Diane Uschner, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)