Innovating within or outside dominant food systems? Different challenges for contrasting crop diversification strategies in Europe.

Innovations supporting a shift towards more sustainable food systems can be developed within the dominant food system regime or in alternative niches. No study has compared the challenges faced in each context. This paper, based on an analysis of 25 cases of European innovations that support crop di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kevin Morel, Eva Revoyron, Magali San Cristobal, Philippe V Baret
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229910
id doaj-e5775576f1484ef5954d1cad6b6a726e
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e5775576f1484ef5954d1cad6b6a726e2021-03-03T21:34:38ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01153e022991010.1371/journal.pone.0229910Innovating within or outside dominant food systems? Different challenges for contrasting crop diversification strategies in Europe.Kevin MorelEva RevoyronMagali San CristobalPhilippe V BaretInnovations supporting a shift towards more sustainable food systems can be developed within the dominant food system regime or in alternative niches. No study has compared the challenges faced in each context. This paper, based on an analysis of 25 cases of European innovations that support crop diversification, explores the extent to which barriers to crop diversification can be related to the proximity of innovation settings with dominant food systems. Drawing on a qualitative analysis of interviews and participatory brainstorming, we highlight 46 different barriers to crop diversification across the cases, at different levels: production; downstream operations from farm to retailing, marketing and consumers; and contracts and coordination between actors. To characterise the diversity of innovation strategies at food system level, we introduce the concept of "food system innovation settings" combining: (i) the type of innovative practice promoted at farm level; (ii) the type of value chain supporting that innovation; and (iii) the type of agriculture involved (organic or conventional). Through a multiple correspondence analysis, we show different patterns of barriers to crop diversification according to three ideal-types of food system innovation settings: (i) "Changing from within", where longer rotations are fostered on conventional farms involved in commodity supply chains; (ii) "Building outside", where crop diversification integrates intercropping on organic farms involved in local supply chains; and (iii) "Playing horizontal", where actors promote alternative crop diversification strategies-either strictly speaking horizontal at spatial level (e.g. strip cropping) or socially horizontal (arrangement between farmers)-without directly challenging the vertical organisation of dominant value chains. We recommend designing targeted research and policy actions according to the food systems they seek to develop. We then discuss further development of our approach to analyse barriers faced in intermediate and hybrid food system configurations.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229910
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kevin Morel
Eva Revoyron
Magali San Cristobal
Philippe V Baret
spellingShingle Kevin Morel
Eva Revoyron
Magali San Cristobal
Philippe V Baret
Innovating within or outside dominant food systems? Different challenges for contrasting crop diversification strategies in Europe.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Kevin Morel
Eva Revoyron
Magali San Cristobal
Philippe V Baret
author_sort Kevin Morel
title Innovating within or outside dominant food systems? Different challenges for contrasting crop diversification strategies in Europe.
title_short Innovating within or outside dominant food systems? Different challenges for contrasting crop diversification strategies in Europe.
title_full Innovating within or outside dominant food systems? Different challenges for contrasting crop diversification strategies in Europe.
title_fullStr Innovating within or outside dominant food systems? Different challenges for contrasting crop diversification strategies in Europe.
title_full_unstemmed Innovating within or outside dominant food systems? Different challenges for contrasting crop diversification strategies in Europe.
title_sort innovating within or outside dominant food systems? different challenges for contrasting crop diversification strategies in europe.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Innovations supporting a shift towards more sustainable food systems can be developed within the dominant food system regime or in alternative niches. No study has compared the challenges faced in each context. This paper, based on an analysis of 25 cases of European innovations that support crop diversification, explores the extent to which barriers to crop diversification can be related to the proximity of innovation settings with dominant food systems. Drawing on a qualitative analysis of interviews and participatory brainstorming, we highlight 46 different barriers to crop diversification across the cases, at different levels: production; downstream operations from farm to retailing, marketing and consumers; and contracts and coordination between actors. To characterise the diversity of innovation strategies at food system level, we introduce the concept of "food system innovation settings" combining: (i) the type of innovative practice promoted at farm level; (ii) the type of value chain supporting that innovation; and (iii) the type of agriculture involved (organic or conventional). Through a multiple correspondence analysis, we show different patterns of barriers to crop diversification according to three ideal-types of food system innovation settings: (i) "Changing from within", where longer rotations are fostered on conventional farms involved in commodity supply chains; (ii) "Building outside", where crop diversification integrates intercropping on organic farms involved in local supply chains; and (iii) "Playing horizontal", where actors promote alternative crop diversification strategies-either strictly speaking horizontal at spatial level (e.g. strip cropping) or socially horizontal (arrangement between farmers)-without directly challenging the vertical organisation of dominant value chains. We recommend designing targeted research and policy actions according to the food systems they seek to develop. We then discuss further development of our approach to analyse barriers faced in intermediate and hybrid food system configurations.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229910
work_keys_str_mv AT kevinmorel innovatingwithinoroutsidedominantfoodsystemsdifferentchallengesforcontrastingcropdiversificationstrategiesineurope
AT evarevoyron innovatingwithinoroutsidedominantfoodsystemsdifferentchallengesforcontrastingcropdiversificationstrategiesineurope
AT magalisancristobal innovatingwithinoroutsidedominantfoodsystemsdifferentchallengesforcontrastingcropdiversificationstrategiesineurope
AT philippevbaret innovatingwithinoroutsidedominantfoodsystemsdifferentchallengesforcontrastingcropdiversificationstrategiesineurope
_version_ 1714816317791404032