Is There a Place for Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis? A Systematic Review of the Literature

Objective. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a minimally invasive technique mainly used to treat neuropathic pain associated with failed back surgery syndrome. However, this therapy has been utilized to treat other chronic painful conditions, such as pain associated with multiple sclerosis (MS). None...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alessandro Rapisarda, Eleonora Ioannoni, Alessandro Izzo, Manuela D’Ercole, Nicola Montano
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2021-01-01
Series:Minimally Invasive Surgery
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9969010
id doaj-e595eb1d10ef4770b32e669f206c8f2c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e595eb1d10ef4770b32e669f206c8f2c2021-05-03T00:00:08ZengHindawi LimitedMinimally Invasive Surgery2090-14532021-01-01202110.1155/2021/9969010Is There a Place for Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis? A Systematic Review of the LiteratureAlessandro Rapisarda0Eleonora Ioannoni1Alessandro Izzo2Manuela D’Ercole3Nicola Montano4Department of NeuroscienceNeurosurgical Intensive Care UnitDepartment of NeuroscienceDepartment of NeuroscienceDepartment of NeuroscienceObjective. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a minimally invasive technique mainly used to treat neuropathic pain associated with failed back surgery syndrome. However, this therapy has been utilized to treat other chronic painful conditions, such as pain associated with multiple sclerosis (MS). Nonetheless, the efficacy of SCS in MS patients has not been fully established. In fact, in most of SCS series, MS patients represent only a subset of a bigger cohort which comprises different causes of pain, motor disorder, and other functional limitations. The aim of our study was to systematically review the literature to evaluate the effectiveness of SCS in MS patients. Methods. A literature search was performed through different databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) using the following terms: “multiple sclerosis,” “spinal cord stimulation,” and “dorsal column stimulation,” according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Results. A total of 452 articles were reviewed, and 7 studies were included in the present analysis. 373 MS patients were submitted to a stimulation trial, and 82 MS patients underwent a de novo implantation. 285/373 (76.4%) of cases submitted to the SCS trial were enrolled for permanent stimulation. We found a long-lasting improvement in 193/346 (55.8%) MS patients with motor disorders, in 90/134 (67.13%) MS patients with urinary dysfunction, and in 28/34 (82.35%) MS patients with neuropathic pain. The efficacy of SCS was higher for urinary dysfunction (p = 0.0144) and neuropathic pain (p = 0.0030) compared with motor disorders. Conclusions. Our systematic review evidences that SCS is effective in MS patients. Urinary dysfunction and pain symptoms seem to be most responsive to SCS. Further studies are needed to improve the patient selection and clarify the best timing to perform SCS in these patients.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9969010
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alessandro Rapisarda
Eleonora Ioannoni
Alessandro Izzo
Manuela D’Ercole
Nicola Montano
spellingShingle Alessandro Rapisarda
Eleonora Ioannoni
Alessandro Izzo
Manuela D’Ercole
Nicola Montano
Is There a Place for Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis? A Systematic Review of the Literature
Minimally Invasive Surgery
author_facet Alessandro Rapisarda
Eleonora Ioannoni
Alessandro Izzo
Manuela D’Ercole
Nicola Montano
author_sort Alessandro Rapisarda
title Is There a Place for Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis? A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_short Is There a Place for Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis? A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full Is There a Place for Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis? A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_fullStr Is There a Place for Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis? A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_full_unstemmed Is There a Place for Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Management of Patients with Multiple Sclerosis? A Systematic Review of the Literature
title_sort is there a place for spinal cord stimulation in the management of patients with multiple sclerosis? a systematic review of the literature
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Minimally Invasive Surgery
issn 2090-1453
publishDate 2021-01-01
description Objective. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a minimally invasive technique mainly used to treat neuropathic pain associated with failed back surgery syndrome. However, this therapy has been utilized to treat other chronic painful conditions, such as pain associated with multiple sclerosis (MS). Nonetheless, the efficacy of SCS in MS patients has not been fully established. In fact, in most of SCS series, MS patients represent only a subset of a bigger cohort which comprises different causes of pain, motor disorder, and other functional limitations. The aim of our study was to systematically review the literature to evaluate the effectiveness of SCS in MS patients. Methods. A literature search was performed through different databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Embase) using the following terms: “multiple sclerosis,” “spinal cord stimulation,” and “dorsal column stimulation,” according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Results. A total of 452 articles were reviewed, and 7 studies were included in the present analysis. 373 MS patients were submitted to a stimulation trial, and 82 MS patients underwent a de novo implantation. 285/373 (76.4%) of cases submitted to the SCS trial were enrolled for permanent stimulation. We found a long-lasting improvement in 193/346 (55.8%) MS patients with motor disorders, in 90/134 (67.13%) MS patients with urinary dysfunction, and in 28/34 (82.35%) MS patients with neuropathic pain. The efficacy of SCS was higher for urinary dysfunction (p = 0.0144) and neuropathic pain (p = 0.0030) compared with motor disorders. Conclusions. Our systematic review evidences that SCS is effective in MS patients. Urinary dysfunction and pain symptoms seem to be most responsive to SCS. Further studies are needed to improve the patient selection and clarify the best timing to perform SCS in these patients.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/9969010
work_keys_str_mv AT alessandrorapisarda isthereaplaceforspinalcordstimulationinthemanagementofpatientswithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT eleonoraioannoni isthereaplaceforspinalcordstimulationinthemanagementofpatientswithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT alessandroizzo isthereaplaceforspinalcordstimulationinthemanagementofpatientswithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT manueladercole isthereaplaceforspinalcordstimulationinthemanagementofpatientswithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewoftheliterature
AT nicolamontano isthereaplaceforspinalcordstimulationinthemanagementofpatientswithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewoftheliterature
_version_ 1714635094145105920