Review of court decisions based on the jury’s decision in the supervisory instance

The subject. The article discusses the procedural peculiarities and grounds for the supervisory (cassation) review of court decisions based on the jury’s decision.The purpose of the article is to assess the effectiveness of the rules on the grounds for review of courts’ decisions based on jury’s ver...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: V. Koryakovtsev
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Dostoevsky Omsk State University 2018-12-01
Series:Pravoprimenenie
Subjects:
Online Access:https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/199
id doaj-e59c48706c0442eaa243c72ecb793dbf
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e59c48706c0442eaa243c72ecb793dbf2021-07-28T21:02:59ZrusDostoevsky Omsk State UniversityPravoprimenenie2542-15142018-12-012410612410.24147/2542-1514.2018.2(4).106-124170Review of court decisions based on the jury’s decision in the supervisory instanceV. Koryakovtsev0All-Russian State University of Justice, St. Petersburg Institute (Branch). SPIN-code: 6993-2457; AuthorID: 564749.The subject. The article discusses the procedural peculiarities and grounds for the supervisory (cassation) review of court decisions based on the jury’s decision.The purpose of the article is to assess the effectiveness of the rules on the grounds for review of courts’ decisions based on jury’s verdict.The description of methodology. The author uses formal-legal and comparative-legal methods as well as legal interpretation of the text of Russian Criminal Procedure Code and Russian Supreme Court’s decisions. The decisions of Russian Constitutional Court and court statistics are also analyzed.The main results and scope of their application. In the introduction the author substantiates the relevance of the proposed research by creating a separate cassation and appeal courts of General jurisdiction, a significant extension of jurisdiction of the Russian court with participation of jurors in the district courts as of 1 June 2018., that will result in a manifold increase in the cases before the courts with participation of jurors in the first instance, and a manifold increase in appeals and representations on the decision of the jury. In the second section of the work the characteristic of legal institution of possible turn to the worst for the condemned situation in cassation and Supervisory instances is given, the analysis is widely known of the resolution of the constitutional court of the Russian Federation of May 11, 2005. The third section of the work considers the grounds for possible review of the decision of the courts with the participation of jurors in the order of Art. 401.6 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and grounds proposed by the Plenum of the RF Supreme Court in the Decree of January 28, 2014. The fourth section of the work is devoted to the characteristics of the rules and procedure of Supervisory proceedings, specifies the types of appealed decisions, powers and limits of the rights of the Presidium of the Russian armed forces, provides examples of review of judicial decisions with the participation of juries that have en-tered into force.Conclusions. The author suggests to replace the grounds for cancellation or amendment of acquittal decisions of courts based on the jury’s decision with the grounds of cassation review of jury trials that are included in art. 664 and 665 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Kazakhstan due to their clearer legal definition and lack of evaluative concepts.https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/199law enforcementcriminal trialjury trialverdictsupervisionsentencecomplaintsubstantial breach of law
collection DOAJ
language Russian
format Article
sources DOAJ
author V. Koryakovtsev
spellingShingle V. Koryakovtsev
Review of court decisions based on the jury’s decision in the supervisory instance
Pravoprimenenie
law enforcement
criminal trial
jury trial
verdict
supervision
sentence
complaint
substantial breach of law
author_facet V. Koryakovtsev
author_sort V. Koryakovtsev
title Review of court decisions based on the jury’s decision in the supervisory instance
title_short Review of court decisions based on the jury’s decision in the supervisory instance
title_full Review of court decisions based on the jury’s decision in the supervisory instance
title_fullStr Review of court decisions based on the jury’s decision in the supervisory instance
title_full_unstemmed Review of court decisions based on the jury’s decision in the supervisory instance
title_sort review of court decisions based on the jury’s decision in the supervisory instance
publisher Dostoevsky Omsk State University
series Pravoprimenenie
issn 2542-1514
publishDate 2018-12-01
description The subject. The article discusses the procedural peculiarities and grounds for the supervisory (cassation) review of court decisions based on the jury’s decision.The purpose of the article is to assess the effectiveness of the rules on the grounds for review of courts’ decisions based on jury’s verdict.The description of methodology. The author uses formal-legal and comparative-legal methods as well as legal interpretation of the text of Russian Criminal Procedure Code and Russian Supreme Court’s decisions. The decisions of Russian Constitutional Court and court statistics are also analyzed.The main results and scope of their application. In the introduction the author substantiates the relevance of the proposed research by creating a separate cassation and appeal courts of General jurisdiction, a significant extension of jurisdiction of the Russian court with participation of jurors in the district courts as of 1 June 2018., that will result in a manifold increase in the cases before the courts with participation of jurors in the first instance, and a manifold increase in appeals and representations on the decision of the jury. In the second section of the work the characteristic of legal institution of possible turn to the worst for the condemned situation in cassation and Supervisory instances is given, the analysis is widely known of the resolution of the constitutional court of the Russian Federation of May 11, 2005. The third section of the work considers the grounds for possible review of the decision of the courts with the participation of jurors in the order of Art. 401.6 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and grounds proposed by the Plenum of the RF Supreme Court in the Decree of January 28, 2014. The fourth section of the work is devoted to the characteristics of the rules and procedure of Supervisory proceedings, specifies the types of appealed decisions, powers and limits of the rights of the Presidium of the Russian armed forces, provides examples of review of judicial decisions with the participation of juries that have en-tered into force.Conclusions. The author suggests to replace the grounds for cancellation or amendment of acquittal decisions of courts based on the jury’s decision with the grounds of cassation review of jury trials that are included in art. 664 and 665 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Kazakhstan due to their clearer legal definition and lack of evaluative concepts.
topic law enforcement
criminal trial
jury trial
verdict
supervision
sentence
complaint
substantial breach of law
url https://enforcement.omsu.ru/jour/article/view/199
work_keys_str_mv AT vkoryakovtsev reviewofcourtdecisionsbasedonthejurysdecisioninthesupervisoryinstance
_version_ 1721263111953973248