Comparing Ventricular Synchrony in Left Bundle Branch and Left Ventricular Septal Pacing in Pacemaker Patients
Background<b>: </b>Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has recently been introduced as a novel physiological pacing strategy. Within LBBAP, distinction is made between left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP, no left bundle capture). Objective: To inv...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-02-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/4/822 |
id |
doaj-e5a80cfc2a4d4acebc4ab5ba6557c065 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e5a80cfc2a4d4acebc4ab5ba6557c0652021-02-18T00:05:15ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832021-02-011082282210.3390/jcm10040822Comparing Ventricular Synchrony in Left Bundle Branch and Left Ventricular Septal Pacing in Pacemaker PatientsLuuk I. B. Heckman0Justin G. L. M. Luermans1Karol Curila2Antonius M. W. Van Stipdonk3Sjoerd Westra4Radovan Smisek5Frits W. Prinzen6Kevin Vernooy7Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre + (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, 100 34 Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre + (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), 6526 GA Nijmegen, The NetherlandsInstitute of Scientific Instruments, the Czech Academy of Sciences, 61264 Brno, Czech RepublicDepartment of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre + (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The NetherlandsBackground<b>: </b>Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has recently been introduced as a novel physiological pacing strategy. Within LBBAP, distinction is made between left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP, no left bundle capture). Objective: To investigate acute electrophysiological effects of LBBP and LVSP as compared to intrinsic ventricular conduction. Methods: Fifty patients with normal cardiac function and pacemaker indication for bradycardia underwent LBBAP. Electrocardiography (ECG) characteristics were evaluated during pacing at various depths within the septum: starting at the right ventricular (RV) side of the septum: the last position with QS morphology, the first position with r’ morphology, LVSP and—in patients where left bundle branch (LBB) capture was achieved—LBBP. From the ECG’s QRS duration and QRS morphology in lead V1, the stimulus- left ventricular activation time left ventricular activation time (LVAT) interval were measured. After conversion of the ECG into vectorcardiogram (VCG) (Kors conversion matrix), QRS area and QRS vector in transverse plane (Azimuth) were determined. Results: QRS area significantly decreased from 82 ± 29 µVs during RV septal pacing (RVSP) to 46 ± 12 µVs during LVSP. In the subgroup where LBB capture was achieved (<i>n </i>= 31), QRS area significantly decreased from 46 ± 17 µVs during LVSP to 38 ± 15 µVs during LBBP, while LVAT was not significantly different between LVSP and LBBP. In patients with normal ventricular activation and narrow QRS, QRS area during LBBP was not significantly different from that during intrinsic activation (37 ± 16 vs. 35 ± 19 µVs, respectively). The Azimuth significantly changed from RVSP (−46 ± 33°) to LVSP (19 ± 16°) and LBBP (−22 ± 14°). The Azimuth during both LVSP and LBBP were not significantly different from normal ventricular activation. QRS area and LVAT correlated moderately (Spearman’s <i>R</i> = 0.58). Conclusions: ECG and VCG indices demonstrate that both LVSP and LBBP improve ventricular dyssynchrony considerably as compared to RVSP, to values close to normal ventricular activation. LBBP seems to result in a small, but significant, improvement in ventricular synchrony as compared to LVSP.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/4/822<b>Keywords</b>: left bundle branch area pacingbradycardia pacingcardiac resynchronization therapy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Luuk I. B. Heckman Justin G. L. M. Luermans Karol Curila Antonius M. W. Van Stipdonk Sjoerd Westra Radovan Smisek Frits W. Prinzen Kevin Vernooy |
spellingShingle |
Luuk I. B. Heckman Justin G. L. M. Luermans Karol Curila Antonius M. W. Van Stipdonk Sjoerd Westra Radovan Smisek Frits W. Prinzen Kevin Vernooy Comparing Ventricular Synchrony in Left Bundle Branch and Left Ventricular Septal Pacing in Pacemaker Patients Journal of Clinical Medicine <b>Keywords</b>: left bundle branch area pacing bradycardia pacing cardiac resynchronization therapy |
author_facet |
Luuk I. B. Heckman Justin G. L. M. Luermans Karol Curila Antonius M. W. Van Stipdonk Sjoerd Westra Radovan Smisek Frits W. Prinzen Kevin Vernooy |
author_sort |
Luuk I. B. Heckman |
title |
Comparing Ventricular Synchrony in Left Bundle Branch and Left Ventricular Septal Pacing in Pacemaker Patients |
title_short |
Comparing Ventricular Synchrony in Left Bundle Branch and Left Ventricular Septal Pacing in Pacemaker Patients |
title_full |
Comparing Ventricular Synchrony in Left Bundle Branch and Left Ventricular Septal Pacing in Pacemaker Patients |
title_fullStr |
Comparing Ventricular Synchrony in Left Bundle Branch and Left Ventricular Septal Pacing in Pacemaker Patients |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparing Ventricular Synchrony in Left Bundle Branch and Left Ventricular Septal Pacing in Pacemaker Patients |
title_sort |
comparing ventricular synchrony in left bundle branch and left ventricular septal pacing in pacemaker patients |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Journal of Clinical Medicine |
issn |
2077-0383 |
publishDate |
2021-02-01 |
description |
Background<b>: </b>Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has recently been introduced as a novel physiological pacing strategy. Within LBBAP, distinction is made between left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP, no left bundle capture). Objective: To investigate acute electrophysiological effects of LBBP and LVSP as compared to intrinsic ventricular conduction. Methods: Fifty patients with normal cardiac function and pacemaker indication for bradycardia underwent LBBAP. Electrocardiography (ECG) characteristics were evaluated during pacing at various depths within the septum: starting at the right ventricular (RV) side of the septum: the last position with QS morphology, the first position with r’ morphology, LVSP and—in patients where left bundle branch (LBB) capture was achieved—LBBP. From the ECG’s QRS duration and QRS morphology in lead V1, the stimulus- left ventricular activation time left ventricular activation time (LVAT) interval were measured. After conversion of the ECG into vectorcardiogram (VCG) (Kors conversion matrix), QRS area and QRS vector in transverse plane (Azimuth) were determined. Results: QRS area significantly decreased from 82 ± 29 µVs during RV septal pacing (RVSP) to 46 ± 12 µVs during LVSP. In the subgroup where LBB capture was achieved (<i>n </i>= 31), QRS area significantly decreased from 46 ± 17 µVs during LVSP to 38 ± 15 µVs during LBBP, while LVAT was not significantly different between LVSP and LBBP. In patients with normal ventricular activation and narrow QRS, QRS area during LBBP was not significantly different from that during intrinsic activation (37 ± 16 vs. 35 ± 19 µVs, respectively). The Azimuth significantly changed from RVSP (−46 ± 33°) to LVSP (19 ± 16°) and LBBP (−22 ± 14°). The Azimuth during both LVSP and LBBP were not significantly different from normal ventricular activation. QRS area and LVAT correlated moderately (Spearman’s <i>R</i> = 0.58). Conclusions: ECG and VCG indices demonstrate that both LVSP and LBBP improve ventricular dyssynchrony considerably as compared to RVSP, to values close to normal ventricular activation. LBBP seems to result in a small, but significant, improvement in ventricular synchrony as compared to LVSP. |
topic |
<b>Keywords</b>: left bundle branch area pacing bradycardia pacing cardiac resynchronization therapy |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/4/822 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT luukibheckman comparingventricularsynchronyinleftbundlebranchandleftventricularseptalpacinginpacemakerpatients AT justinglmluermans comparingventricularsynchronyinleftbundlebranchandleftventricularseptalpacinginpacemakerpatients AT karolcurila comparingventricularsynchronyinleftbundlebranchandleftventricularseptalpacinginpacemakerpatients AT antoniusmwvanstipdonk comparingventricularsynchronyinleftbundlebranchandleftventricularseptalpacinginpacemakerpatients AT sjoerdwestra comparingventricularsynchronyinleftbundlebranchandleftventricularseptalpacinginpacemakerpatients AT radovansmisek comparingventricularsynchronyinleftbundlebranchandleftventricularseptalpacinginpacemakerpatients AT fritswprinzen comparingventricularsynchronyinleftbundlebranchandleftventricularseptalpacinginpacemakerpatients AT kevinvernooy comparingventricularsynchronyinleftbundlebranchandleftventricularseptalpacinginpacemakerpatients |
_version_ |
1724263960613486592 |