Comparing Ventricular Synchrony in Left Bundle Branch and Left Ventricular Septal Pacing in Pacemaker Patients

Background<b>: </b>Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has recently been introduced as a novel physiological pacing strategy. Within LBBAP, distinction is made between left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP, no left bundle capture). Objective: To inv...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Luuk I. B. Heckman, Justin G. L. M. Luermans, Karol Curila, Antonius M. W. Van Stipdonk, Sjoerd Westra, Radovan Smisek, Frits W. Prinzen, Kevin Vernooy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-02-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/4/822
id doaj-e5a80cfc2a4d4acebc4ab5ba6557c065
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e5a80cfc2a4d4acebc4ab5ba6557c0652021-02-18T00:05:15ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832021-02-011082282210.3390/jcm10040822Comparing Ventricular Synchrony in Left Bundle Branch and Left Ventricular Septal Pacing in Pacemaker PatientsLuuk I. B. Heckman0Justin G. L. M. Luermans1Karol Curila2Antonius M. W. Van Stipdonk3Sjoerd Westra4Radovan Smisek5Frits W. Prinzen6Kevin Vernooy7Department of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre + (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady, 100 34 Prague, Czech RepublicDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre + (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Centre (Radboudumc), 6526 GA Nijmegen, The NetherlandsInstitute of Scientific Instruments, the Czech Academy of Sciences, 61264 Brno, Czech RepublicDepartment of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The NetherlandsDepartment of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Centre + (MUMC+), 6229 HX Maastricht, The NetherlandsBackground<b>: </b>Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has recently been introduced as a novel physiological pacing strategy. Within LBBAP, distinction is made between left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP, no left bundle capture). Objective: To investigate acute electrophysiological effects of LBBP and LVSP as compared to intrinsic ventricular conduction. Methods: Fifty patients with normal cardiac function and pacemaker indication for bradycardia underwent LBBAP. Electrocardiography (ECG) characteristics were evaluated during pacing at various depths within the septum: starting at the right ventricular (RV) side of the septum: the last position with QS morphology, the first position with r’ morphology, LVSP and—in patients where left bundle branch (LBB) capture was achieved—LBBP. From the ECG’s QRS duration and QRS morphology in lead V1, the stimulus- left ventricular activation time left ventricular activation time (LVAT) interval were measured. After conversion of the ECG into vectorcardiogram (VCG) (Kors conversion matrix), QRS area and QRS vector in transverse plane (Azimuth) were determined. Results: QRS area significantly decreased from 82 ± 29 µVs during RV septal pacing (RVSP) to 46 ± 12 µVs during LVSP. In the subgroup where LBB capture was achieved (<i>n </i>= 31), QRS area significantly decreased from 46 ± 17 µVs during LVSP to 38 ± 15 µVs during LBBP, while LVAT was not significantly different between LVSP and LBBP. In patients with normal ventricular activation and narrow QRS, QRS area during LBBP was not significantly different from that during intrinsic activation (37 ± 16 vs. 35 ± 19 µVs, respectively). The Azimuth significantly changed from RVSP (−46 ± 33°) to LVSP (19 ± 16°) and LBBP (−22 ± 14°). The Azimuth during both LVSP and LBBP were not significantly different from normal ventricular activation. QRS area and LVAT correlated moderately (Spearman’s <i>R</i> = 0.58). Conclusions: ECG and VCG indices demonstrate that both LVSP and LBBP improve ventricular dyssynchrony considerably as compared to RVSP, to values close to normal ventricular activation. LBBP seems to result in a small, but significant, improvement in ventricular synchrony as compared to LVSP.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/4/822<b>Keywords</b>: left bundle branch area pacingbradycardia pacingcardiac resynchronization therapy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Luuk I. B. Heckman
Justin G. L. M. Luermans
Karol Curila
Antonius M. W. Van Stipdonk
Sjoerd Westra
Radovan Smisek
Frits W. Prinzen
Kevin Vernooy
spellingShingle Luuk I. B. Heckman
Justin G. L. M. Luermans
Karol Curila
Antonius M. W. Van Stipdonk
Sjoerd Westra
Radovan Smisek
Frits W. Prinzen
Kevin Vernooy
Comparing Ventricular Synchrony in Left Bundle Branch and Left Ventricular Septal Pacing in Pacemaker Patients
Journal of Clinical Medicine
<b>Keywords</b>: left bundle branch area pacing
bradycardia pacing
cardiac resynchronization therapy
author_facet Luuk I. B. Heckman
Justin G. L. M. Luermans
Karol Curila
Antonius M. W. Van Stipdonk
Sjoerd Westra
Radovan Smisek
Frits W. Prinzen
Kevin Vernooy
author_sort Luuk I. B. Heckman
title Comparing Ventricular Synchrony in Left Bundle Branch and Left Ventricular Septal Pacing in Pacemaker Patients
title_short Comparing Ventricular Synchrony in Left Bundle Branch and Left Ventricular Septal Pacing in Pacemaker Patients
title_full Comparing Ventricular Synchrony in Left Bundle Branch and Left Ventricular Septal Pacing in Pacemaker Patients
title_fullStr Comparing Ventricular Synchrony in Left Bundle Branch and Left Ventricular Septal Pacing in Pacemaker Patients
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Ventricular Synchrony in Left Bundle Branch and Left Ventricular Septal Pacing in Pacemaker Patients
title_sort comparing ventricular synchrony in left bundle branch and left ventricular septal pacing in pacemaker patients
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Clinical Medicine
issn 2077-0383
publishDate 2021-02-01
description Background<b>: </b>Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has recently been introduced as a novel physiological pacing strategy. Within LBBAP, distinction is made between left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP, no left bundle capture). Objective: To investigate acute electrophysiological effects of LBBP and LVSP as compared to intrinsic ventricular conduction. Methods: Fifty patients with normal cardiac function and pacemaker indication for bradycardia underwent LBBAP. Electrocardiography (ECG) characteristics were evaluated during pacing at various depths within the septum: starting at the right ventricular (RV) side of the septum: the last position with QS morphology, the first position with r’ morphology, LVSP and—in patients where left bundle branch (LBB) capture was achieved—LBBP. From the ECG’s QRS duration and QRS morphology in lead V1, the stimulus- left ventricular activation time left ventricular activation time (LVAT) interval were measured. After conversion of the ECG into vectorcardiogram (VCG) (Kors conversion matrix), QRS area and QRS vector in transverse plane (Azimuth) were determined. Results: QRS area significantly decreased from 82 ± 29 µVs during RV septal pacing (RVSP) to 46 ± 12 µVs during LVSP. In the subgroup where LBB capture was achieved (<i>n </i>= 31), QRS area significantly decreased from 46 ± 17 µVs during LVSP to 38 ± 15 µVs during LBBP, while LVAT was not significantly different between LVSP and LBBP. In patients with normal ventricular activation and narrow QRS, QRS area during LBBP was not significantly different from that during intrinsic activation (37 ± 16 vs. 35 ± 19 µVs, respectively). The Azimuth significantly changed from RVSP (−46 ± 33°) to LVSP (19 ± 16°) and LBBP (−22 ± 14°). The Azimuth during both LVSP and LBBP were not significantly different from normal ventricular activation. QRS area and LVAT correlated moderately (Spearman’s <i>R</i> = 0.58). Conclusions: ECG and VCG indices demonstrate that both LVSP and LBBP improve ventricular dyssynchrony considerably as compared to RVSP, to values close to normal ventricular activation. LBBP seems to result in a small, but significant, improvement in ventricular synchrony as compared to LVSP.
topic <b>Keywords</b>: left bundle branch area pacing
bradycardia pacing
cardiac resynchronization therapy
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/4/822
work_keys_str_mv AT luukibheckman comparingventricularsynchronyinleftbundlebranchandleftventricularseptalpacinginpacemakerpatients
AT justinglmluermans comparingventricularsynchronyinleftbundlebranchandleftventricularseptalpacinginpacemakerpatients
AT karolcurila comparingventricularsynchronyinleftbundlebranchandleftventricularseptalpacinginpacemakerpatients
AT antoniusmwvanstipdonk comparingventricularsynchronyinleftbundlebranchandleftventricularseptalpacinginpacemakerpatients
AT sjoerdwestra comparingventricularsynchronyinleftbundlebranchandleftventricularseptalpacinginpacemakerpatients
AT radovansmisek comparingventricularsynchronyinleftbundlebranchandleftventricularseptalpacinginpacemakerpatients
AT fritswprinzen comparingventricularsynchronyinleftbundlebranchandleftventricularseptalpacinginpacemakerpatients
AT kevinvernooy comparingventricularsynchronyinleftbundlebranchandleftventricularseptalpacinginpacemakerpatients
_version_ 1724263960613486592