Modele bicamerale comparate. Romania: Monocameralism versus bicameralism
<p><em>The paper attempts to evaluate the Romanian bicameral model as well as to identify and critically asses which are the options our country has in choosing between unicameral and bicameral system. The analysis attempts to observe the characteristics of some Second Chambers that are...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | ron |
Published: |
Babes-Bolyai University
2007-06-01
|
Series: | Revista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative |
Online Access: | https://rtsa.ro/rtsa/index.php/rtsa/article/view/157 |
id |
doaj-e5b2424721834641ad293e3f5cccac34 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-e5b2424721834641ad293e3f5cccac342021-08-09T08:54:36ZronBabes-Bolyai UniversityRevista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative1454-13782007-06-019192133157Modele bicamerale comparate. Romania: Monocameralism versus bicameralismCynthia Carmen CURT0asist. univ. drd., Catedra de Ştiinţe Politice, Facultatea de Ştiinţe Politice, Administrative şi ale Comunicării, Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai, Cluj- Napoca<p><em>The paper attempts to evaluate the Romanian bicameral model as well as to identify and critically asses which are the options our country has in choosing between unicameral and bicameral system. The analysis attempts to observe the characteristics of some Second Chambers that are related to Romanian bicameralism by influencing the configuration of the Romanian bicameral legislature, or which devised constitutional mechanisms can be used in order to preserve an efficient bicameral formula. Also the alternative of giving up the bicameral formula due to some arguments related to the simplification and the efficiency of the legislative procedure is explored.</em></p>https://rtsa.ro/rtsa/index.php/rtsa/article/view/157 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
ron |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Cynthia Carmen CURT |
spellingShingle |
Cynthia Carmen CURT Modele bicamerale comparate. Romania: Monocameralism versus bicameralism Revista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative |
author_facet |
Cynthia Carmen CURT |
author_sort |
Cynthia Carmen CURT |
title |
Modele bicamerale comparate. Romania: Monocameralism versus bicameralism |
title_short |
Modele bicamerale comparate. Romania: Monocameralism versus bicameralism |
title_full |
Modele bicamerale comparate. Romania: Monocameralism versus bicameralism |
title_fullStr |
Modele bicamerale comparate. Romania: Monocameralism versus bicameralism |
title_full_unstemmed |
Modele bicamerale comparate. Romania: Monocameralism versus bicameralism |
title_sort |
modele bicamerale comparate. romania: monocameralism versus bicameralism |
publisher |
Babes-Bolyai University |
series |
Revista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative |
issn |
1454-1378 |
publishDate |
2007-06-01 |
description |
<p><em>The paper attempts to evaluate the Romanian bicameral model as well as to identify and critically asses which are the options our country has in choosing between unicameral and bicameral system. The analysis attempts to observe the characteristics of some Second Chambers that are related to Romanian bicameralism by influencing the configuration of the Romanian bicameral legislature, or which devised constitutional mechanisms can be used in order to preserve an efficient bicameral formula. Also the alternative of giving up the bicameral formula due to some arguments related to the simplification and the efficiency of the legislative procedure is explored.</em></p> |
url |
https://rtsa.ro/rtsa/index.php/rtsa/article/view/157 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT cynthiacarmencurt modelebicameralecomparateromaniamonocameralismversusbicameralism |
_version_ |
1721214913804763136 |