Modele bicamerale comparate. Romania: Monocameralism versus bicameralism

Modele bicamerale comparate. Romania: Monocameralism versus bicameralism

<p><em>The paper attempts to evaluate the Romanian bicameral model as well as to identify and critically asses which are the options our country has in choosing between unicameral and bicameral system. The analysis attempts to observe the characteristics of some Second Chambers that are...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cynthia Carmen CURT
Format: Article
Language:ron
Published: Babes-Bolyai University 2007-06-01
Series:Revista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative
Online Access:https://rtsa.ro/rtsa/index.php/rtsa/article/view/157
id doaj-e5b2424721834641ad293e3f5cccac34
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e5b2424721834641ad293e3f5cccac342021-08-09T08:54:36ZronBabes-Bolyai UniversityRevista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative1454-13782007-06-019192133157Modele bicamerale comparate. Romania: Monocameralism versus bicameralismCynthia Carmen CURT0asist. univ. drd., Catedra de Ştiinţe Politice, Facultatea de Ştiinţe Politice, Administrative şi ale Comunicării, Universitatea Babeş-Bolyai, Cluj- Napoca<p><em>The paper attempts to evaluate the Romanian bicameral model as well as to identify and critically asses which are the options our country has in choosing between unicameral and bicameral system. The analysis attempts to observe the characteristics of some Second Chambers that are related to Romanian bicameralism by influencing the configuration of the Romanian bicameral legislature, or which devised constitutional mechanisms can be used in order to preserve an efficient bicameral formula. Also the alternative of giving up the bicameral formula due to some arguments related to the simplification and the efficiency of the legislative procedure is explored.</em></p>https://rtsa.ro/rtsa/index.php/rtsa/article/view/157
collection DOAJ
language ron
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Cynthia Carmen CURT
spellingShingle Cynthia Carmen CURT
Modele bicamerale comparate. Romania: Monocameralism versus bicameralism
Revista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative
author_facet Cynthia Carmen CURT
author_sort Cynthia Carmen CURT
title Modele bicamerale comparate. Romania: Monocameralism versus bicameralism
title_short Modele bicamerale comparate. Romania: Monocameralism versus bicameralism
title_full Modele bicamerale comparate. Romania: Monocameralism versus bicameralism
title_fullStr Modele bicamerale comparate. Romania: Monocameralism versus bicameralism
title_full_unstemmed Modele bicamerale comparate. Romania: Monocameralism versus bicameralism
title_sort modele bicamerale comparate. romania: monocameralism versus bicameralism
publisher Babes-Bolyai University
series Revista Transilvană de Ştiinţe Administrative
issn 1454-1378
publishDate 2007-06-01
description <p><em>The paper attempts to evaluate the Romanian bicameral model as well as to identify and critically asses which are the options our country has in choosing between unicameral and bicameral system. The analysis attempts to observe the characteristics of some Second Chambers that are related to Romanian bicameralism by influencing the configuration of the Romanian bicameral legislature, or which devised constitutional mechanisms can be used in order to preserve an efficient bicameral formula. Also the alternative of giving up the bicameral formula due to some arguments related to the simplification and the efficiency of the legislative procedure is explored.</em></p>
url https://rtsa.ro/rtsa/index.php/rtsa/article/view/157
work_keys_str_mv AT cynthiacarmencurt modelebicameralecomparateromaniamonocameralismversusbicameralism
_version_ 1721214913804763136

Similar Items