An Axiology of Information Security for Futuristic Neuroprostheses: Upholding Human Values in the Context of Technological Posthumanization

Previous works exploring the challenges of ensuring information security for neuroprosthetic devices and their users have typically built on the traditional InfoSec concept of the “CIA Triad” of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. However, we argue that the CIA Triad provides an increasing...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Matthew E. Gladden
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2017.00605/full
id doaj-e5d57f11fc224760ade1383e6cbc6430
record_format Article
spelling doaj-e5d57f11fc224760ade1383e6cbc64302020-11-25T02:29:37ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2017-11-011110.3389/fnins.2017.00605307712An Axiology of Information Security for Futuristic Neuroprostheses: Upholding Human Values in the Context of Technological PosthumanizationMatthew E. GladdenPrevious works exploring the challenges of ensuring information security for neuroprosthetic devices and their users have typically built on the traditional InfoSec concept of the “CIA Triad” of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. However, we argue that the CIA Triad provides an increasingly inadequate foundation for envisioning information security for neuroprostheses, insofar as it presumes that (1) any computational systems to be secured are merely instruments for expressing their human users' agency, and (2) computing devices are conceptually and practically separable from their users. Drawing on contemporary philosophy of technology and philosophical and critical posthumanist analysis, we contend that futuristic neuroprostheses could conceivably violate these basic InfoSec presumptions, insofar as (1) they may alter or supplant their users' biological agency rather than simply supporting it, and (2) they may structurally and functionally fuse with their users to create qualitatively novel “posthumanized” human-machine systems that cannot be secured as though they were conventional computing devices. Simultaneously, it is noted that many of the goals that have been proposed for future neuroprostheses by InfoSec researchers (e.g., relating to aesthetics, human dignity, authenticity, free will, and cultural sensitivity) fall outside the scope of InfoSec as it has historically been understood and touch on a wide range of ethical, aesthetic, physical, metaphysical, psychological, economic, and social values. We suggest that the field of axiology can provide useful frameworks for more effectively identifying, analyzing, and prioritizing such diverse types of values and goods that can (and should) be pursued through InfoSec practices for futuristic neuroprostheses.http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2017.00605/fullinformation securityCIA triadneuroprostheseshuman-computer interactiontechnological posthumanizationphilosophy of technology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthew E. Gladden
spellingShingle Matthew E. Gladden
An Axiology of Information Security for Futuristic Neuroprostheses: Upholding Human Values in the Context of Technological Posthumanization
Frontiers in Neuroscience
information security
CIA triad
neuroprostheses
human-computer interaction
technological posthumanization
philosophy of technology
author_facet Matthew E. Gladden
author_sort Matthew E. Gladden
title An Axiology of Information Security for Futuristic Neuroprostheses: Upholding Human Values in the Context of Technological Posthumanization
title_short An Axiology of Information Security for Futuristic Neuroprostheses: Upholding Human Values in the Context of Technological Posthumanization
title_full An Axiology of Information Security for Futuristic Neuroprostheses: Upholding Human Values in the Context of Technological Posthumanization
title_fullStr An Axiology of Information Security for Futuristic Neuroprostheses: Upholding Human Values in the Context of Technological Posthumanization
title_full_unstemmed An Axiology of Information Security for Futuristic Neuroprostheses: Upholding Human Values in the Context of Technological Posthumanization
title_sort axiology of information security for futuristic neuroprostheses: upholding human values in the context of technological posthumanization
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
issn 1662-453X
publishDate 2017-11-01
description Previous works exploring the challenges of ensuring information security for neuroprosthetic devices and their users have typically built on the traditional InfoSec concept of the “CIA Triad” of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. However, we argue that the CIA Triad provides an increasingly inadequate foundation for envisioning information security for neuroprostheses, insofar as it presumes that (1) any computational systems to be secured are merely instruments for expressing their human users' agency, and (2) computing devices are conceptually and practically separable from their users. Drawing on contemporary philosophy of technology and philosophical and critical posthumanist analysis, we contend that futuristic neuroprostheses could conceivably violate these basic InfoSec presumptions, insofar as (1) they may alter or supplant their users' biological agency rather than simply supporting it, and (2) they may structurally and functionally fuse with their users to create qualitatively novel “posthumanized” human-machine systems that cannot be secured as though they were conventional computing devices. Simultaneously, it is noted that many of the goals that have been proposed for future neuroprostheses by InfoSec researchers (e.g., relating to aesthetics, human dignity, authenticity, free will, and cultural sensitivity) fall outside the scope of InfoSec as it has historically been understood and touch on a wide range of ethical, aesthetic, physical, metaphysical, psychological, economic, and social values. We suggest that the field of axiology can provide useful frameworks for more effectively identifying, analyzing, and prioritizing such diverse types of values and goods that can (and should) be pursued through InfoSec practices for futuristic neuroprostheses.
topic information security
CIA triad
neuroprostheses
human-computer interaction
technological posthumanization
philosophy of technology
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fnins.2017.00605/full
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewegladden anaxiologyofinformationsecurityforfuturisticneuroprosthesesupholdinghumanvaluesinthecontextoftechnologicalposthumanization
AT matthewegladden axiologyofinformationsecurityforfuturisticneuroprosthesesupholdinghumanvaluesinthecontextoftechnologicalposthumanization
_version_ 1724831929972293632